-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/05/12 09:51, William Hubbs wrote:
> Hmm, if I do that I would also have to put it back ro after I modify
> issue because fsck hasn't run yet...
>
> Do we want to mess around with the fs before fsck is run?
We could play it safe and store the me
On Tuesday 01 May 2012 12:51:55 William Hubbs wrote:
> On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 11:45:01AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Tuesday 01 May 2012 11:06:42 William Hubbs wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 11:59:02AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > > we already have examples of the init scripts
Mike Frysinger posted on Tue, 01 May 2012 12:13:27 -0400 as excerpted:
> On Tuesday 01 May 2012 11:45:01 Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> based on past behavior, i assumed it was operating as indented
>
> blah, swap that 't' & 'd'
I thought for SURE that was a deliberate play on words. Mind if I borrow
On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 11:45:01AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tuesday 01 May 2012 11:06:42 William Hubbs wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 11:59:02AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > the fact that the script leaves your system in a hard to recover state is
> > > what i'm whining about, no
On Tuesday 01 May 2012 11:45:01 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tuesday 01 May 2012 11:06:42 William Hubbs wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 11:59:02AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > the fact that the script leaves your system in a hard to recover state
> > > is what i'm whining about, not that ude
On Tuesday 01 May 2012 11:06:42 William Hubbs wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 11:59:02AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > the fact that the script leaves your system in a hard to recover state is
> > what i'm whining about, not that udev requires devtmpfs.
>
> So why did you decide to whine inste
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 11:59:02AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> the fact that the script leaves your system in a hard to recover state is
> what
> i'm whining about, not that udev requires devtmpfs.
So why did you decide to whine instead of opening a bug? :p
> /dev/pts isn't created, thus dev
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 03:36:17PM +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > On Mon, 30 Apr 2012, Thomas Sachau wrote:
>
> > Krzysztof Pawlik schrieb:
> >> On 30/04/12 10:39, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > If the eclass doesn't work with FEATURES="collision-protect"
> > then it needs to be fixed.
>
