On Tuesday 01 May 2012 11:06:42 William Hubbs wrote: > On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 11:59:02AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > the fact that the script leaves your system in a hard to recover state is > > what i'm whining about, not that udev requires devtmpfs. > > So why did you decide to whine instead of opening a bug? :p
based on past behavior, i assumed it was operating as indented > > we already have examples of the init scripts modifying /etc/issue to > > notify login entry points that their system needs manual attention to > > recover. > > This part can't happen in the udev init script since / is ro when it is > run. Doing something in udev-postmount is also eroneous because that > assumes that the user is booting to the default runlevel which they may > not be. in the past, we would `mount -o remount,rw /`, but that was because we needed to add missing dirs in /. -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
