Paweł Hajdan, Jr. posted on Mon, 08 Aug 2011 09:51:52 -0700 as excerpted:
> On 8/8/11 7:42 AM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
>> Am Samstag 06 August 2011, 23:57:13 schrieb Fabio Erculiani:
>>> I really love the idea of being able to atomically push updates across
>>> multiple CPVs. This is also what K
On Tuesday 02 of August 2011 20:32:32 Samuli Suominen wrote:
> On 08/02/2011 09:20 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> > Hello fellow developers,
> >
> > I would like to discuss the possibility to create a new virtual package
> > for all the icon-theme packages. According to this bug[1], it seems like
>
On 8/8/11 7:42 AM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> Am Samstag 06 August 2011, 23:57:13 schrieb Fabio Erculiani:
>> I really love the idea of being able to atomically push updates
>> across multiple CPVs. This is also what KDE, GNOME, and many other
>> teams are waiting for. Having multiple repos means
On 8/8/11 2:52 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> x11-themes/faenza-icon/theme )"
nit: This is a typo, right? I guess repoman would still catch it, but
anyway.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Am Samstag 06 August 2011, 23:57:13 schrieb Fabio Erculiani:
> I really love the idea of being able to atomically push updates across
> multiple CPVs.
> This is also what KDE, GNOME, and many other teams are waiting for.
> Having multiple repos means no atomicity and at this point, I would
> rather
# Kacper Kowalik (08 Aug 2011)
# Ancient, doesn't work with modern kernels, never stable
# and practically unmaintained
# Bugs: 165559, 165749, 171967
# Pending removal in 30 days
sys-fs/unionfs
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 08/06/2011 12:00 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> On 08/02/2011 07:30 PM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
>> Markos Chandras schrieb:
>>> - --: Not all packages include the same icons so users may end
>>> up with missing icons for some application
