On 8/8/11 7:42 AM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > Am Samstag 06 August 2011, 23:57:13 schrieb Fabio Erculiani: >> I really love the idea of being able to atomically push updates >> across multiple CPVs. This is also what KDE, GNOME, and many other >> teams are waiting for. Having multiple repos means no atomicity and >> at this point, I would rather prefer CVS (omg!). > > Exactly. This is why I would also vote for a single tree and single > modern vcs.
+1 here. I'm curious what problems multiple repos would be solving, or is it just "it's cool and Fedora/other distros does it" ? > In addition, I would like to propose that we keep the number of > required "home-made addons and scripts" to a minimum. As long as we > have straight cvs or straight git, every tool developed for these > systems just works. As soon as we start assembling our tree with a > huge self-made infrastructure, we're all confined to our own tools > for every operation that steps over the newly created repository > limits. +1 here too. Vanilla git + repoman is cool. If we have a wrapper on top of that that assembles the rsync tree it starts to be much more complex, even more than our current CVS it seems.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
