Hello fellow devs,
We're pleased to announce that EAPI 4 is now available and allowed in
the main tree, in ~testing ebuilds :)
New features in EAPI 4 include REQUIRED_USE, pkg_pretend, REPLACING_VERSIONS
and REPLACED_BY_VERSION and various other interesting changes and fixes.
To find out more ab
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 5:07 AM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 28-01-2011 22:11:30 +0100, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
>> So draft we would like to have implemented as Glep update is this diff:
>> http://dev.gentoo.org/~scarabeus/glep-0048.diff
>>
>> Please comment and help us improve the "english" of the wh
El sáb, 29-01-2011 a las 19:56 +0100, Thomas Sachau escribió:
> Am 29.01.2011 19:30, schrieb Pacho Ramos:
> > El sáb, 29-01-2011 a las 13:10 -0500, Nathan Phillip Brink escribió:
> >> On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 06:03:10PM +0100, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hello
> >>>
> >>> I would like to know wha
Am 29.01.2011 19:30, schrieb Pacho Ramos:
> El sáb, 29-01-2011 a las 13:10 -0500, Nathan Phillip Brink escribió:
>> On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 06:03:10PM +0100, Pacho Ramos wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello
>>>
>>> I would like to know what is "blocking" this from landing main tree in
>>> the "near" future, as I r
El sáb, 29-01-2011 a las 13:10 -0500, Nathan Phillip Brink escribió:
> On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 06:03:10PM +0100, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> >
> > Hello
> >
> > I would like to know what is "blocking" this from landing main tree in
> > the "near" future, as I reviewed:
> >
> > http://www.mail-archive.c
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 06:03:10PM +0100, Pacho Ramos wrote:
>
> Hello
>
> I would like to know what is "blocking" this from landing main tree in
> the "near" future, as I reviewed:
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org/msg41737.html
>
> and looks like there wasn't major p
On 01/29/2011 07:03 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
I would like to know what is "blocking" this from landing main tree in
the "near" future, as I reviewed:
http://www.mail-archive.com/gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org/msg41737.html
and looks like there wasn't major problems (at least commented in this
thread
El mié, 01-12-2010 a las 19:57 +0100, Thomas Sachau escribió:
> Hi,
>
> i have already written about this some months ago and updated the code in
> relation to the comments
> especially from vapier.
>
> Basicly, it does now first set abi-specific vars (like CC, CFLAGS and others
> (setup_abi_en
On 01/29/2011 12:42 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
>
> Finally, if Devrel, QA, and the Council have already talked this out
> and agree that QA is in the best place to police technical commit
> issues, then pipe this email to /dev/null...
>
The diff proposed in this thread has not yet been talked abou
On 28-01-2011 22:11:30 +0100, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
> So draft we would like to have implemented as Glep update is this diff:
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~scarabeus/glep-0048.diff
>
> Please comment and help us improve the "english" of the whole document
> so it gets accepted :)
(:Nread http://dev.gen
On 2011.01.29 05:20, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
[snip] ...
> and that whoever feels to be in place to
> deal out QA (and I think this has gone wrong a few times recently) is
> required to:
>
> 1) state and/or explain policy specifically where it is being not
> adhered to;
> 2) offer alternatives where
11 matches
Mail list logo
