Re: [gentoo-dev] Masking

2010-12-01 Thread justin
On 02/12/10 02:45, Zac Medico wrote: > sci-chemistry/mopac7-1.10-r1 =sys-devel/automake-1.8* > sci-chemistry/mopac7-1.13 =sys-devel/automake-1.8* > sci-chemistry/mopac7-1.13-r1 =sys-devel/automake-1.8* This can be also considered to be fixed. Only ppc needs to be stabled. signature.asc De

Re: [gentoo-dev] Masking

2010-12-01 Thread justin
On 02/12/10 02:45, Zac Medico wrote: > I've attached a list of packages, and script to generate it. > sci-chemistry/ccp4-apps-6.1.3-r1=sys-devel/automake-1.6* sci-chemistry/ccp4-apps-6.1.3-r2=sys-devel/automake-1.6* sci-chemistry/ccp4-apps-6.1.3-r4=sys-devel/automake-1.6*

[gentoo-dev] Re: Masking

2010-12-01 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
And just to add another reason, automake 1.8 already starts triggering warnings with Perl 5.12. How soon do you fare that a Perl update will make older automake fail altogether? -- Diego Elio Pettenò — “Flameeyes” http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ If you found a .asc file in this mail and know not what

Re: [gentoo-dev] Masking

2010-12-01 Thread Zac Medico
I've attached a list of packages, and script to generate it. -- Thanks, Zac #!/usr/bin/env python import os import sys import portage if len(sys.argv) != 2 or not portage.isvalidatom(sys.argv[1]): sys.stderr.write("usage: %s \n" % os.path.basename(sys.argv[0])) sys.exit(1) input_atom = porta

[gentoo-dev] Masking

2010-12-01 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
Hi all, Not sure if you know but we're currently experiencing a spur of build failures related to eautoreconf (in particular, eaclocal) and libtool-2.4 The new libtool release only works with automake 1.9 and later. [1] In this situation, the proper way to tackle the issue is to make sure the bui

Re: [gentoo-dev] Disabling auto-bumping of active Python version

2010-12-01 Thread Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01-12-2010 19:13, Alec Warner wrote: > On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto > wrote: > On 29-11-2010 10:34, Sebastian Pipping wrote: On 11/29/10 09:35, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: > There will probably

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: MULTI_ABI support addition to main tree portage

2010-12-01 Thread Michał Górny
On Wed, 01 Dec 2010 22:47:45 +0100 Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: > x86-64/amd64 (which Intel called IA32e or EM64T iirc). I think I've seen them calling it 'Intel 64' too which introduces even more confusion. -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: net-im/ekg2 and the ssl/openssl/gnutls flags

2010-12-01 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
Il giorno mer, 01/12/2010 alle 22.51 +0100, Michał Górny ha scritto: > > > Pure GnuTLS. > That's good, so what about this? jabber? ( ssl? ( !gnutls ( openssl ) gnutls? ( gnutls ) ) irc? ( ssl? ( openssl ) ) Use a couple of variables to avoid repeating the three-way (all-off ssl on, ssl-and-gnu

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: net-im/ekg2 and the ssl/openssl/gnutls flags

2010-12-01 Thread Michał Górny
On Wed, 01 Dec 2010 22:44:45 +0100 Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: > Il giorno mer, 01/12/2010 alle 22.30 +0100, Michał Górny ha scritto: > > > > In other words, the preferred complete build of ekg2 requires both > > gnutls and openssl. However, all of the features should work fine > > with openssl it

[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: MULTI_ABI support addition to main tree portage

2010-12-01 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
Il giorno gio, 02/12/2010 alle 00.44 +0300, Alexey Shvetsov ha scritto: > > i call it ia32 since its original name of this arch however it can be > better called x86 (x86_32 and x86_64) It is by far not the original name of the architecture… it was retconned after IA-64 was released. And it only

[gentoo-dev] Re: net-im/ekg2 and the ssl/openssl/gnutls flags

2010-12-01 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
Il giorno mer, 01/12/2010 alle 22.30 +0100, Michał Górny ha scritto: > > In other words, the preferred complete build of ekg2 requires both > gnutls and openssl. However, all of the features should work fine with > openssl itself as well. > There is a simple first question to ask here. Does it us

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: MULTI_ABI support addition to main tree portage

2010-12-01 Thread Alexey Shvetsov
Well ok =) i call it ia32 since its original name of this arch however it can be better called x86 (x86_32 and x86_64) PS seems many users were confused with ia64 since they associate it with core2 and nahalem 2010/12/1 Diego Elio Pettenò : > Il giorno mer, 01/12/2010 alle 22.11 +0300, Alexey Sh

[gentoo-dev] net-im/ekg2 and the ssl/openssl/gnutls flags

2010-12-01 Thread Michał Górny
Hello, I'd like to ask for an advice related to net-im/ekg2 ebuild. I would like to switch the ebuilds there to use the primary autotools build system for the package, and the last thing on my to-do list is adding a 'ssl' flag to the package. The package consists of a core application and a set o

Re: [gentoo-dev] Disabling auto-bumping of active Python version

2010-12-01 Thread Joshua Saddler
On Wed, 01 Dec 2010 21:58:20 +0100 "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > So we have some automatic reporting. Can we have a webpage for > that, or a mailing list that people can subscribe to? Mailing list: http://bugs.gentoo.org/329165 I have no idea how to go about doing an automated webpage or other in

Re: [gentoo-dev] Disabling auto-bumping of active Python version

2010-12-01 Thread Jeremy Olexa
On Wed, 01 Dec 2010 21:58:20 +0100, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote: On 12/1/10 9:34 PM, Joshua Saddler wrote: Catalyst sends automated emails to rel...@gentoo.org from the various build boxes: dolphin, poseidon, other dev.g.o machines. So we have some automatic reporting. Can we have a webpage for th

Re: [gentoo-dev] Disabling auto-bumping of active Python version

2010-12-01 Thread Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
On 12/1/10 9:34 PM, Joshua Saddler wrote: > Catalyst sends automated emails to rel...@gentoo.org from the > various build boxes: dolphin, poseidon, other dev.g.o machines. So we have some automatic reporting. Can we have a webpage for that, or a mailing list that people can subscribe to? Idea: ma

Re: [gentoo-dev] Disabling auto-bumping of active Python version

2010-12-01 Thread Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
On 12/1/10 9:13 PM, Alec Warner wrote: >> How does a developer know when the stage generation is broken? Is >> there a dashboard? At work we have a guy who is basically a build cop >> and checks our build dashboard once a day or so and if it is broken he >> goes and finds the guy who broke it and

Re: [gentoo-dev] Disabling auto-bumping of active Python version

2010-12-01 Thread Joshua Saddler
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 12:13:03 -0800 Alec Warner wrote: > On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto > wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On 29-11-2010 10:34, Sebastian Pipping wrote: > >> On 11/29/10 09:35, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrot

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Maintainer notes in metadata.xml?

2010-12-01 Thread Richard Freeman
On 12/01/2010 01:16 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: > Il giorno mer, 01/12/2010 alle 19.05 +0100, Thomas Kahle ha scritto: >> >> >> I agree, comments within the ebuild are practically invisible to >> archteams (at least to me for x86). But also running repoman is >> usually >> the final step, right

[gentoo-dev] Re: MULTI_ABI support addition to main tree portage

2010-12-01 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
Il giorno mer, 01/12/2010 alle 22.11 +0300, Alexey Shvetsov ha scritto: > > PS also with this feature seems amd64 and x86 can be merged in one > arch (like it was done in kernel) since its only abis of ia32 > I would suggest against that. For the kernel it's somewhat easier, but for userland, x8

Re: [gentoo-dev] MULTI_ABI support addition to main tree portage

2010-12-01 Thread Thomas Sachau
Am 01.12.2010 20:11, schrieb Alexey Shvetsov: > Well =) > > This will be killer feature in gentoo =P > Also what about more complex arhes than ia32? like mips of ppc? I cant speak in detail about the other arches, since i dont know them that much. Basicly, if you can crosscompile for a different

Re: [gentoo-dev] MULTI_ABI support addition to main tree portage

2010-12-01 Thread Thomas Sachau
Am 01.12.2010 20:05, schrieb Fabian Groffen: > Hi Thomas, > > On 01-12-2010 19:57:46 +0100, Thomas Sachau wrote: >> The current implementation uses a USE-dep like way internally to >> satisfy the needed dependencies, so that e.g. 32bit libs on a 64bit >> platform get their required dependencies bu

Re: [gentoo-dev] Disabling auto-bumping of active Python version

2010-12-01 Thread Alec Warner
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 29-11-2010 10:34, Sebastian Pipping wrote: >> On 11/29/10 09:35, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: >>> There will probably be no active version of Python set. >> >>

Re: [gentoo-dev] Stable Python stage repair thread

2010-12-01 Thread Sebastian Pipping
Hello, the proposed changes have been applied to all ebuilds of dev-lang/python in Gentoo's main tree as of now. So it's in CVS now, mirrors take longer. If you stumble upon problems with it please - file bugs with details - reply here, pointing to the bug NOTE: If you plan to explicitly unm

Re: [gentoo-dev] MULTI_ABI support addition to main tree portage

2010-12-01 Thread Alexey Shvetsov
Well =) This will be killer feature in gentoo =P Also what about more complex arhes than ia32? like mips of ppc? PS also with this feature seems amd64 and x86 can be merged in one arch (like it was done in kernel) since its only abis of ia32 2010/12/1 Thomas Sachau : > Hi, > > i have already wri

Re: [gentoo-dev] MULTI_ABI support addition to main tree portage

2010-12-01 Thread Fabian Groffen
Hi Thomas, On 01-12-2010 19:57:46 +0100, Thomas Sachau wrote: > The current implementation uses a USE-dep like way internally to > satisfy the needed dependencies, so that e.g. 32bit libs on a 64bit > platform get their required dependencies built with 32bit libs > installed. This just means that

[gentoo-dev] MULTI_ABI support addition to main tree portage

2010-12-01 Thread Thomas Sachau
Hi, i have already written about this some months ago and updated the code in relation to the comments especially from vapier. Basicly, it does now first set abi-specific vars (like CC, CFLAGS and others (setup_abi_env function in bin/auto-multilib.sh contains the full list), then does build th

[gentoo-dev] Stable Python stage repair thread

2010-12-01 Thread Sebastian Pipping
Hello! I have done a bit more testing now. To do so I have isolated the eselect-python-update behavior into testing ebuilds (package "virtual/debug-eselect-python") reduced to just that problem (no compilation and the like, see attachment, also in sping overlay). The test scenario is made of tw

[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Maintainer notes in metadata.xml?

2010-12-01 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
Il giorno mer, 01/12/2010 alle 19.05 +0100, Thomas Kahle ha scritto: > > > I agree, comments within the ebuild are practically invisible to > archteams (at least to me for x86). But also running repoman is > usually > the final step, right before committing. The place for comments that > need t

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Maintainer notes in metadata.xml?

2010-12-01 Thread Thomas Kahle
On 17:35 Wed 01 Dec , Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: > > Comments inside are better suited for this task - you see/update notes > > as you edit ebuild. > > > How many ATs/arch maintainers will look _within_ the ebuild when testing > an ebuild for stable? I agree, comments within the ebuild are pra

Re: [gentoo-dev] Disabling auto-bumping of active Python version

2010-12-01 Thread Sebastian Pipping
On 12/01/10 05:02, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: > As Arfrever noted, this is likely the cause of the broken automated > weekly stages for this past week. By not having a python symlink / > wrapper, stages generation failed on stage2 run. Yes, a fellow dev already reported that issue to me. I

[gentoo-dev] Re: Maintainer notes in metadata.xml?

2010-12-01 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
Il giorno mer, 01/12/2010 alle 17.02 +0300, Peter Volkov ha scritto: > > Comments inside are better suited for this task - you see/update notes > as you edit ebuild. > How many ATs/arch maintainers will look _within_ the ebuild when testing an ebuild for stable? -- Diego Elio Pettenò — “Flameey

[gentoo-dev] Re: Maintainer notes in metadata.xml?

2010-12-01 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
Il giorno mer, 01/12/2010 alle 07.25 +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan ha scritto: > > > That's just the DTD not getting validated. We can just change the DTD > and repoman won't complain about the XML being invalid. > What Matt was saying is that I actually asked for something that was explicitly printed

Re: [gentoo-dev] Maintainer notes in metadata.xml?

2010-12-01 Thread Peter Volkov
В Срд, 01/12/2010 в 02:00 +0100, Diego Elio Pettenò пишет: > I was wondering if we have space already, or if others would feel > strongly about making space for, maintainer notes in packages' > metadata.xml. Comments inside are better suited for this task - you see/update notes as you edit ebuild.

[gentoo-dev] [warning] the bug queue has 102 bugs

2010-12-01 Thread Alex Alexander
Our bug queue has 102 bugs! If you have some spare time, please help assign/sort a few bugs. To view the bug queue, click one of the following links: http: http://bit.ly/bsHeJt https: http://bit.ly/8Z4xUU Thanks!