On Thu, 09 Apr 2009 19:20:39 +0300
Mart Raudsepp wrote:
> All developers should enable it (a QA enforcement), but users by default
> - no, NO.
> There is more to a distribution than technical considerations.
Yes, please, and can we do it now? I am frankly sick of failing testsuites
and would r
Mart Raudsepp wrote:
> Enabling tests by default feels like driving users away, because all of
> a sudden their upgrades taken even more time (possibly unexplained to
> them, as an EAPI bump in an ebuild introducing it is not visible to
> them), and they'd just say to hell with it and go to a bin
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>
> Unfortunately, it looks like this proposal's one of those things that
> some people will hate for ideological reasons no matter what. I just
> hope there're enough people on the Council for whom QA and user systems
> not breaking is sufficiently important that they'll vo
Hello,
The kernel team is tentatively planning to request that gentoo-sources-2.6.28
gets marked stable on x86+amd64 on May 3rd, assuming we have fixed all
regressions (we have some open, which will hopefully be fixed soon).
We currently only have one open out-of-kernel package bug. This bug,
* Marijn Schouten (hkBst) (hk...@gentoo.org) wrote:
> James Rowe wrote:
> > Package tests will have been run a -- possibly large -- number of
> > times when users see them if they are rolled in to the EAPI bump. This
> > isn't like the current situation of enabling tests and hoping somebody
> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
James Rowe wrote:
> * Christian Faulhammer (fa...@gentoo.org) wrote:
>> Some years ago as a Gentoo beginner I read the documentation of
>> FEATURES and enabled "test", because it sounded useful. After one week
>> I disabled it again as merges took to
