On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 02:47 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Jan 2008 18:44:22 -0800
> "Alec Warner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Uh... So where do the original problems come from? Are you saying
> > > that packages mysteriously start breaking on their own because
> > > no-one's maint
On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 02:47 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Jan 2008 18:44:22 -0800
> "Alec Warner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Uh... So where do the original problems come from? Are you saying
> > > that packages mysteriously start breaking on their own because
> > > no-one's mainta
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
"Alec Warner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Uh... So where do the original problems come from? Are you saying
that packages mysteriously start breaking on their own because
no-one's maintaining them?
Of course they do
Ah, right. Because of the magical elf that lives i
On Tue, 8 Jan 2008 18:44:22 -0800
"Alec Warner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Uh... So where do the original problems come from? Are you saying
> > that packages mysteriously start breaking on their own because
> > no-one's maintaining them?
>
> Of course they do
Ah, right. Because of the magica
On 1/8/08, Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 18:38:07 -0800
> Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 02:17 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > > Oh. Yeah. Because people with an attitude like yours think that the
> > > correct way to fix a
On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 18:38:07 -0800
Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 02:17 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > Oh. Yeah. Because people with an attitude like yours think that the
> > correct way to fix a repoman message is to start nuking arch
> > keywords, ignoring
On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 02:17 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> Oh. Yeah. Because people with an attitude like yours think that the
> correct way to fix a repoman message is to start nuking arch keywords,
> ignoring what it does to the rest of the tree.
...for the architecture in question which is pro
On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 14:04:49 -0800
Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have foo 1.0, which is mips. There is foo 2.0, which is stable
> everywhere else. The foo 1.0 ebuild does not conform to current
> ebuild standards. I want to commit changes to foo 2.0, and repoman
> won't allow m
Wooo !
Mail subject screwing (yes i18n conspiracy is always just behind :D)
A bit late but you know, work and stuff... Welcome !
--
Gilles Dartiguelongue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
Alec Warner wrote:
> On 1/8/08, William L. Thomson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> To keep it short and sweet. Our current structure is FUBARed.
>>
>> Foundation? Trustees? Election? Nominees? Ball dropped, shall we pick it
>> up and resume a game?
>>
>> Gentoo does not exist legally. NPO fi
On Tue, 2008-01-08 at 19:59 +, Ferris McCormick wrote:
> 3) Most devrel requests seem really to relate to CoC violations. Would
> you like us to bounce those to the CoC people, process them using CoC
> rules, or keep doing what we are doing now (generally, close them with a
> note explaining
Chris Gianelloni kirjoitti:
On Tue, 2008-01-08 at 21:49 +0200, Petteri Räty wrote:
Stefan Hellermann kirjoitti:
I've tried to not use the system-set and set up a virtual called
virtual/minimal-system which depends on all the packages I need (no gcc
or perl, only coreutils, glibc, baselayout an
On Tuesday, 08. January 2008 22:44:17 Chrissy Fullam wrote:
> 'bodies' would be needed to enforce CoC on #gentoo-dev
I don't really see any need for moderation on #gentoo-dev. We've managed
quite nicely without big brothers watching us so far and I think we
should simply keep doing that.
Yes,
On Tue, 2008-01-08 at 21:49 +0200, Petteri Räty wrote:
> Stefan Hellermann kirjoitti:
> > I've tried to not use the system-set and set up a virtual called
> > virtual/minimal-system which depends on all the packages I need (no gcc
> > or perl, only coreutils, glibc, baselayout and some packages t
On Tue, 2008-01-08 at 00:30 -0800, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> On 00:42 Tue 08 Jan , Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> > Anyway, as having a complete dependency tree is almost impossible
> > because of that, I have an alternative proposal: reducing the size of
> > the system package set. Right n
On Sun, 2008-01-06 at 23:35 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 14:09:24 +0100
> Matthias Langer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This kind of conversation is not technical at all... Ciaranm, are you
> > a MIPS user? If so, do you think that running KEYWORDS="mips" is less
> > likely
On Sun, 2008-01-06 at 23:34 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> Ok, so explain:
>
> * How perpetually open bugs are a maintenance burden. They don't
> generate emails and they don't require any work on the maintainer's
> part. Is the mere fact that they show up in queries all you're
> concerned about,
On Sun, 2008-01-06 at 11:36 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
> that has both sides happy here, but that won't happen if you don't admit
> there's a problem.
He doesn't have to admit anything. He is neither an ebuild maintainer
nor an arch team developer. Basically, his opinion is useless in this
case, a
> Ferris McCormick wrote:
> As always, I'd like a status report on Code of Conduct, with
> three questions in mind:
>
> 1) Do we have an implementation schedule?
It is already being enforced by a variety of teams as they find it
applicable.
> 2) Have we identified some warm bodies for it?
Go
On Sat, 2008-01-05 at 04:32 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Jan 2008 20:20:18 -0800
> Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > No offense to anyone, but holding back hundreds of developers and
> > thousands of users for a handful of developers
>
> ...and how exactly are hundreds
On 07-01-2008 22:31:54 +0100, Luca Barbato wrote:
> Here is a list of interesting questions: "Are we fine?" "What are we
> going to do?"
>
> Please project leaders try to reply in short.
Gentoo/Alt:Prefix
> Are we fine?
Sure.
- reached >10% coverage/replication of the gentoo-x86 tree
- convince
Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Don't suppose you have a url for their reasoning?
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151758
--
Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò
http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 01:37:28PM +0100, Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten?? wrote:
> "Santiago M. Mola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Having a complete
> > deptree and having a small system package set should be independent
> > goals, maybe your proposal should focus on making possible to have a
> >
As always, I'd like a status report on Code of Conduct, with three
questions in mind:
1) Do we have an implementation schedule? ;
2) Have we identified some warm bodies for it?;
3) Most devrel requests seem really to relate to CoC violations. Would
you like us to bounce those to the CoC peopl
Stefan Hellermann kirjoitti:
I've tried to not use the system-set and set up a virtual called
virtual/minimal-system which depends on all the packages I need (no gcc
or perl, only coreutils, glibc, baselayout and some packages that are
really needed for booting up). This is what I think should
Donnie Berkholz schrieb:
On 00:42 Tue 08 Jan , Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
Anyway, as having a complete dependency tree is almost impossible
because of that, I have an alternative proposal: reducing the size of
the system package set. Right now system contains stuff like ncurses,
readl
As a gentoo user (developpers will do, i am sure), i wish you a good arrival
!
2008/1/8, Rémi Cardona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Pierre-Yves Rofes a écrit :
> > On Tue, January 8, 2008 1:29 pm, Denis Dupeyron wrote:
> >> So please give a warm welcome to Jean-Noël as a new Gentoo developer.
> >>
> >
Hi,
Don't worry, I may very well return to Vancouver some day as I really love
the place. Actually, I am thinking of returning there on Autumn 2008 for at
least 6 monthes. I wonder if I can be part of two conspiracies at once?!
Jean-Noël
On 1/8/08, Robin H. Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 01:29:43PM +0100, Denis Dupeyron wrote:
> Jean-No??l currently lives in Paris, France, but he studied in
> Vancouver, Canada for some time.
Why'd you leave Vancouver? We need to get a Vancouver conspiracy going
again, there hasn't been one since mr_bones_ ran away! (hey, 4
d
Pierre-Yves Rofes a écrit :
> On Tue, January 8, 2008 1:29 pm, Denis Dupeyron wrote:
>> So please give a warm welcome to Jean-Noël as a new Gentoo developer.
>>
>
> Yay for the french conspiracy growing yet again :)
We'll have to have another conspiracy beer-meeting then ;)
> Welcome to you Jean
Denis Dupeyron wrote:
> Jean-Noël currently lives in Paris, France, but he studied in
> Vancouver, Canada for some time. He is 26 and happily married. Apart
> from computers, he has a passion for games (video, role-playing and
> boardgames), music (progressive metal & rock), and outdoors
> (especia
On Tue, January 8, 2008 1:29 pm, Denis Dupeyron wrote:
> It's my pleasure to introduce Jean-Noël Rivasseau (elvanor) as a new
> Gentoo developer. He will start by working in the Java team, and I
> hear there are plans for a new eclass soonish.
>
> Jean-Noël currently lives in Paris, France, but he
"Santiago M. Mola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Having a complete
> deptree and having a small system package set should be independent
> goals, maybe your proposal should focus on making possible to have a
> deptree as complete as possible independently of what packages are on
> system set.
QA
It's my pleasure to introduce Jean-Noël Rivasseau (elvanor) as a new
Gentoo developer. He will start by working in the Java team, and I
hear there are plans for a new eclass soonish.
Jean-Noël currently lives in Paris, France, but he studied in
Vancouver, Canada for some time. He is 26 and happily
On Jan 8, 2008 12:34 PM, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> So my goals are:
> - have a deptree as complete as possible;
Your goals make sense but reducing the system package set seems like
workaround to get you indirectly where you want. Having a complete
deptree and havin
Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What is your goal? Is there something you're trying to accomplish that's
> impossible? It's clear that changing this would be a fair amount of
> work, and I don't understand the benefits.
With the current size of system packages set, having a comple
On 00:42 Tue 08 Jan , Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> Anyway, as having a complete dependency tree is almost impossible
> because of that, I have an alternative proposal: reducing the size of
> the system package set. Right now system contains stuff like ncurses,
> readline, zlib, autoconf,
37 matches
Mail list logo
