On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 18:38:07 -0800 Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 02:17 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > Oh. Yeah. Because people with an attitude like yours think that the > > correct way to fix a repoman message is to start nuking arch > > keywords, ignoring what it does to the rest of the tree. > > ...for the architecture in question which is proving incapable of > keeping up with the state of the tree as it is... > > Sorry, you fail.
Uh... So where do the original problems come from? Are you saying that packages mysteriously start breaking on their own because no-one's maintaining them? -- Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
