the new util-linux package has merged the setarch binary. for the upgrade
path, i figure we do:
- drop sys-apps/setarch from profiles
- add sys-apps/setarch to util-linux-2.12 based on arch?()
- add !sys-apps/setarch to util-linux-2.13+
any input ?
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Harald van Dijk wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 08:08:13PM +0200, Torsten Rehn wrote:
>> On Friday 06 July 2007 19:56, Harald van Dijk wrote:
>>> And what if they decide they don't accept the license on the first run?
>>> They'll already have installed
070707 Duncan wrote:
> When I open or CC on a bug that then gets fixed,
> I often feel like adding a thanks to the bug.
> However, while it may be polite in other circumstances,
> in this case it could be viewed as bug spam, so I've hesitated.
> I'm wondering, what's the general opinion?
I try t
On Friday 06 July 2007, Ryan Hill wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > get your "waaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing:
> > glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
> > gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
> > in the next day or so
>
> Now that the futimens patch is in coreutils, i heartily endorse this
>
Duncan wrote:
> When I open or CC on a bug that then gets fixed, I often feel like adding
> a thanks to the bug. However, while it may be polite in other
> circumstances, in this case it could be viewed as bug spam, so I've
> hesitated.
I don't think anyone can be opposed to a thank you. Ke
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> get your "waaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing:
> glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
> gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
> in the next day or so
> -mike
Now that the futimens patch is in coreutils, i heartily endorse this
event or product.
BTW, the GCC 4.2 porting tra
On Sat, 7 Jul 2007 00:34:39 + (UTC)
Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When I open or CC on a bug that then gets fixed, I often feel like
> adding a thanks to the bug. However, while it may be polite in other
> circumstances, in this case it could be viewed as bug spam, so I've
> hesitated
On 7/7/07, Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
When I open or CC on a bug that then gets fixed, I often feel like adding
a thanks to the bug. However, while it may be polite in other
circumstances, in this case it could be viewed as bug spam, so I've
hesitated.
I reviewed the bug reporting guidel
Denis Dupeyron wrote:
> He will
> initially work for that other desktop environment, also known as KDE.
> So please, everybody, give a warm non-welcome to Tobias.
KDE? Boo!
How's that for a non-greeting? ;)
Just kidding. Congrats on completing your extra quizzes, Tobias!
signature.as
When I open or CC on a bug that then gets fixed, I often feel like adding
a thanks to the bug. However, while it may be polite in other
circumstances, in this case it could be viewed as bug spam, so I've
hesitated.
I reviewed the bug reporting guidelines a month or so ago and didn't see
any
Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Fri, 06 Jul
2007 13:32:27 -0400:
> i dont plan on gcc-4.2.0 ever hitting stable, just opening up the
> testers so gcc-4.2.1 will be smooth
FWIW, I've only a single package not compiling on 4.2.0 now, and you
alread
Le vendredi 06 juillet 2007 à 23:52 +0200, Denis Dupeyron a écrit :
> It's my pleasure to not introduce you to somebody you already knew for
> the good reason he is already a Gentoo developer. He is the German
> translator follow-up to be exact. However, Tobias obtained today a
> shiny new license
On 7/7/07, Michal Januszewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, Jul 07, 2007 at 01:06:07AM +0300, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> I think we should have user space splash... As fbsplash does not work
splashutils is a _userspace_ splash. fbsplash isn't, but then it only
provides the "verbose" mode (bac
On Sat, Jul 07, 2007 at 01:06:07AM +0300, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> I think we should have user space splash... As fbsplash does not work
splashutils is a _userspace_ splash. fbsplash isn't, but then it only
provides the "verbose" mode (background pictures on system consoles) and
there is no way of
I think we should have user space splash... As fbsplash does not work
with all video cards and last time I checked the whole framebuffer in
kernel is not actively maintained.
Alon.
On 7/7/07, Michal Januszewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
# Michał Januszewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (06 Jul 2007)
#
* José Luis Rivero (yoswink) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I've just rescued the xml we used the last year and update the current
> nominations. The list is in:
>
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~yoswink/council-2007.xml
It has been moved to:
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/voting-logs/council-2007-nomine
It's my pleasure to not introduce you to somebody you already knew for
the good reason he is already a Gentoo developer. He is the German
translator follow-up to be exact. However, Tobias obtained today a
shiny new license to break the tree as a full developer. He will
initially work for that othe
# Michał Januszewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (06 Jul 2007)
# Unsupported, use media-gfx/splashutils instead.
# Masked for removal in 30 days.
media-gfx/bootsplash
We don't provide any kernels patched with bootsplash anymore and
media-gfx/bootsplash has no support for baselayout-2. media-gfx/splashutil
Luca Barbato wrote:
> gcc-4.2.0 won't rape your house and burn your pet anymore?
>
> I'll give a test on ppc* soonish.
I've been using it on x86 and ppc32 (ibook g4) for a week or two with no
issues.
Thanks,
Donnie
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Fri, 6 Jul 2007 00:08:43 -0400
Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> get your "waaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing:
> glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
> gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
> in the next day or so
Will we see the hardened gcc-4 patchset included in this?
--atj
--
On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 08:08:13PM +0200, Torsten Rehn wrote:
> On Friday 06 July 2007 19:56, Harald van Dijk wrote:
> > And what if they decide they don't accept the license on the first run?
> > They'll already have installed the software, which requires acceptance
> > of the license.
>
> No viol
On Friday 06 July 2007, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > get your "waaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing:
> > glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
> > gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
> > in the next day or so
>
> From the topic of #emacs: "glibc2.6 currently breaks ema
On Friday 06 July 2007, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
> static - !!do not set this during bootstrap!! Causes binaries to be
> statically linked instead of dynamically
i dont really think this is in the same category at all with the other flags
you mentioned here ... plus i'm not sure this is eve
"Marijn Schouten (hkBst)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> - From the topic of #emacs: "glibc2.6 currently breaks emacs, use
> glibc2.5 for now". Emacs herd seems to be in hiding, so I haven't
> been able to confirm with them.
We are old-school and don't hang around on IRC. We are very
responsive to bug
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> get your "waaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing:
> glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
> gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
> in the next day or so
> -mike
- From the topic of #emacs: "glibc2.6 currently breaks emacs, use gli
Marijn Schouten (hkBst) kirjoitti:
> A grep '!!' /usr/portage/profiles/use.desc reveals the following:
>
> bootstrap - !!internal use only!! DO NOT SET THIS FLAG YOURSELF!, used during
> original system bootstrapping [make stage2]
> build - !!internal use only!! DO NOT SET THIS FLAG YOURSELF!, use
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A grep '!!' /usr/portage/profiles/use.desc reveals the following:
bootstrap - !!internal use only!! DO NOT SET THIS FLAG YOURSELF!, used during
original system bootstrapping [make stage2]
build - !!internal use only!! DO NOT SET THIS FLAG YOURSELF!, u
On Friday 06 July 2007 19:56, Harald van Dijk wrote:
> And what if they decide they don't accept the license on the first run?
> They'll already have installed the software, which requires acceptance
> of the license.
No violation here: "[...] IF YOU DO NOT AGREE TO THE TERMS OF THIS
AGREEMENT, PRO
Harald van Dijk napsal(a):
> And what if they decide they don't accept the license on the first run?
Then the software won't run, very easy.
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E
Primary key finge
On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 07:40:47PM +0200, Jakub Moc wrote:
> Mike Frysinger napsal(a):
> > On Friday 06 July 2007, Jakub Moc wrote:
> >> Harald van Dijk napsal(a):
> >>> so eutils.eclass's check_license function should probably be used.
> >> Broken until Bug 17367 is implemented.
> >
> > the same e
Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Fri, 06 Jul
2007 11:13:30 -0400:
>> Could you reopen bug #179744 (kdesvn amd64 -fPIC issue) and add it to
>> the 4.2 tracker? I didn't file it so can't, but it's definitely 4.2
>> related.
>
> done, cheers
Thanks.
Mike Frysinger napsal(a):
> On Friday 06 July 2007, Jakub Moc wrote:
>> Harald van Dijk napsal(a):
>>> so eutils.eclass's check_license function should probably be used.
>> Broken until Bug 17367 is implemented.
>
> the same exact thing could be said for everything using `built_with_use`
This chec
On Friday 06 July 2007, Jakub Moc wrote:
> Harald van Dijk napsal(a):
> > so eutils.eclass's check_license function should probably be used.
>
> Broken until Bug 17367 is implemented.
the same exact thing could be said for everything using `built_with_use`
> It's enough that loads of games kill no
On Friday 06 July 2007, Harald van Dijk wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 12:08:20AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > get your "waaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing:
> > glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
> > gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
> > in the next day or so
>
> Why 4.2.0 rather than 4
Harald van Dijk napsal(a):
> so eutils.eclass's check_license function should probably be used.
Broken until Bug 17367 is implemented. It's enough that loads of games
kill non-interactivity.
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/
On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 12:08:20AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> get your "waaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing:
> glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
> gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
> in the next day or so
Why 4.2.0 rather than 4.2.1 RC1? Are there problems with the RC, or are
all import
On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 03:09:23PM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> Missed something before.. But after reading this it leads me to
> conclusion nero-3.0.0.0 needs RESTRICT="fetch"? Would someone be kind
> enough to take a look for me to get a second opinion as it might be out
> of context / I'm ove
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Friday 06 July 2007, Luca Barbato wrote:
>> Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>> get your "waaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing:
>>> glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
>>> gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
>>> in the next day or so
>> gcc-4.2.0 won't rape your house and burn yo
On Friday 06 July 2007, Steve Long wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >> > this would be for 2007.1+ profiles and we can leave the old things in
> >> > place until we phase out 2007.0 and older completely
> >>
> >> This is actually something I was already planning on working on setting
> >> up. To a
On Friday 06 July 2007, Duncan wrote:
> Could you reopen bug #179744 (kdesvn amd64 -fPIC issue) and add it to the
> 4.2 tracker? I didn't file it so can't, but it's definitely 4.2 related.
done, cheers
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Friday 06 July 2007, Luca Barbato wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > get your "waaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing:
> > glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
> > gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
> > in the next day or so
>
> gcc-4.2.0 won't rape your house and burn your pet anymore?
>
> I'll
Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Fri, 06 Jul
2007 00:08:43 -0400:
> gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
> in the next day or so
Could you reopen bug #179744 (kdesvn amd64 -fPIC issue) and add it to the
4.2 tracker? I didn't file it so can't, but it's definitel
# Piotr Jaroszyński <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (06 Jul 2007)
# Masked for removal. bug #167379.
x11-themes/gdm-themes
--
Best Regards,
Piotr Jaroszyński
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Samuli Suominen napsal(a):
> Missed something before.. But after reading this it leads me to
> conclusion nero-3.0.0.0 needs RESTRICT="fetch"? Would someone be kind
> enough to take a look for me to get a second opinion as it might be out
> of context / I'm overlooking something. Now, it's RESTRICT
Am Freitag, 6. Juli 2007 14:09 schrieb Samuli Suominen:
> Missed something before.. But after reading this it leads me to
> conclusion nero-3.0.0.0 needs RESTRICT="fetch"? Would someone be kind
> enough to take a look for me to get a second opinion as it might be out
> of context / I'm overlooking
Missed something before.. But after reading this it leads me to
conclusion nero-3.0.0.0 needs RESTRICT="fetch"? Would someone be kind
enough to take a look for me to get a second opinion as it might be out
of context / I'm overlooking something. Now, it's RESTRICT="mirror".
Also, I failed to see s
On Fri, 2007-07-06 at 00:08 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> get your "waaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing:
> glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
> gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
> in the next day or so
Been using it for a few weeks on ~x86-fbsd without issue now.
Any chance you could add a
On Fri, 6 Jul 2007 00:08:43 -0400
Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> get your "waaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing:
> glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
> gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
> in the next day or so
> -mike
-DRAC-WAS-HERE == -O4 now?
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Luca Barbato wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
get your "waaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing:
glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
in the next day or so
-mike
gcc-4.2.0 won't rape your house and burn your pet anymore?
I see they got around to adding the -fno-
On Friday, 6. July 2007 10:09, Petteri Räty wrote:
> Mike Frysinger kirjoitti:
> > get your "waaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing:
> > glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
> > gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
> > in the next day or so
> > -mike
>
> About how many packages will break with the ne
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> get your "waaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing:
> glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
> gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
> in the next day or so
> -mike
gcc-4.2.0 won't rape your house and burn your pet anymore?
I'll give a test on ppc* soonish.
lu
--
Luca Barbato
Friday, 6. July 2007, Petteri Räty Ви написали:
> Mike Frysinger kirjoitti:
> > get your "waaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing:
> > gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
> About how many packages will break with the new gcc version? Of course
> switch not used by default so that's ok.
If this mak
Ryan Reich wrote:
>
> If there's interest in incorporating this, I wouldn't mind testing my
> idea. Once I get past the initial resistance to doing anything at
> all, it's probably two minutes' compilation time plus two more writing
> the config files to set up.
>
I think I should point out tha
Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Thu,
05 Jul 2007 15:17:36 -0700:
> On Mon, 2007-07-02 at 21:10 +0200, Torsten Veller wrote:
>> Chris Gianelloniwolf31o2
>
> While I thank you for the nomination for next year's Gentoo Council, I
> have dec
Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> > this would be for 2007.1+ profiles and we can leave the old things in
>> > place until we phase out 2007.0 and older completely
>>
>> This is actually something I was already planning on working on setting
>> up. To avoid conflicting with the current profiles, I was plan
Mike Frysinger kirjoitti:
> get your "waaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing:
> glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
> gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
> in the next day or so
> -mike
About how many packages will break with the new gcc version? Of course
switch not used by default so that's ok.
56 matches
Mail list logo
