On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 23:33 +0200, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
> Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Carsten Lohrke wrote:
> > > the amd64 team is unresponsive on even trivial stabilisation
> > > request form the KDE team as well, lately.
> > >
> > welp's been away ;)
>
> welp does not touch K
+# Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (19 May 2007)
+# Time for the binary ebuild to go as nothing is using it
+# any more. Please use dev-java/sun-javamail instead.
+dev-java/sun-javamail-bin
+
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Fri, 18 May 2007 08:41:10 -0400 (EDT)
"Caleb Tennis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Based on some recent findings, it looks like the two above mentioned
> features don't work together. pch don't get distributed to distcc
> nodes, so they're basically mutually exclusive. However, distcc is a
> F
On Thu, 17 May 2007 13:12:01 +0200
Hans de Graaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've had the 'stricter' FEATURE turned on for some time and found that
> many packages failed due to the QA notice regarding poor programming
> practices. I filed a few bugs for this but have not gotten a lot of
> respo
Luca Barbato wrote:
> Enhance distcc?
++
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
