Re: [gentoo-dev] Proctors Episode II - Attack of the clones

2007-04-18 Thread Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
Roy Bamford wrote: > On 2007.04.18 12:49, Chris Gianelloni wrote: >> On Wed, 2007-04-18 at 10:30 +0200, Wernfried Haas wrote: >> > blackace, jmbsvicetto, marienz, pilla and mark_alec. >> >> Are they at least wearing different color outfits so we can tell them >> apart? >> >> -- >> Chris Gianellon

Re: [gentoo-dev] Proctors Episode II - Attack of the clones

2007-04-18 Thread Andrew Gaffney
Roy Bamford wrote: You can see some of our outfits at http://dev.gentoo.org/~mark_alec/photos/Postbusters.jpg amne is pretty hot as a chick -- Andrew Gaffneyhttp://dev.gentoo.org/~agaffney/ Gentoo Linux Developer Installer Project -

Re: [gentoo-dev] Proctors Episode II - Attack of the clones

2007-04-18 Thread Michael Cummings
On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 09:53:55PM +0100, Roy Bamford wrote: > You can see some of our outfits at > http://dev.gentoo.org/~mark_alec/photos/Postbusters.jpg I think I'm going to have to do counciling now... -- -o()o-- Michael Cummings |#gen

Re: [gentoo-dev] Proctors Episode II - Attack of the clones

2007-04-18 Thread Roy Bamford
On 2007.04.18 12:49, Chris Gianelloni wrote: On Wed, 2007-04-18 at 10:30 +0200, Wernfried Haas wrote: > blackace, jmbsvicetto, marienz, pilla and mark_alec. Are they at least wearing different color outfits so we can tell them apart? -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering Strategic Lead Alpha/

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] [POLICY] Keywording/Stabilizing Bug Assignment Policy

2007-04-18 Thread Jim Ramsay
Chris Gianelloni wrote: > On Wed, 2007-04-18 at 07:39 -0600, Jim Ramsay wrote: > > Vlastimil Babka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Or maybe implement new bugzilla keywords, like STABLEREQ and > > > KEYWORDREQ which would be added to the respective bugs. Then you > > > (the maintainer) can easily c

Re: [gentoo-dev] [POLICY] Keywording/Stabilizing Bug Assignment Policy

2007-04-18 Thread Mart Raudsepp
On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 14:56 -0400, Doug Goldstein wrote: > I would like to take this time to note and re-affirm the proper bug > assignment policy and have it noted somewhere officially in Gentoo Policy. > > Bugs that are created for the purpose of getting arches to keyword or > stabilize a partic

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] [POLICY] Keywording/Stabilizing Bug Assignment Policy

2007-04-18 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Wed, 2007-04-18 at 07:39 -0600, Jim Ramsay wrote: > Vlastimil Babka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Or maybe implement new bugzilla keywords, like STABLEREQ and > > KEYWORDREQ which would be added to the respective bugs. Then you (the > > maintainer) can easily create (and save) an advanced searc

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] [POLICY] Keywording/Stabilizing Bug Assignment Policy

2007-04-18 Thread Jim Ramsay
Vlastimil Babka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Or maybe implement new bugzilla keywords, like STABLEREQ and > KEYWORDREQ which would be added to the respective bugs. Then you (the > maintainer) can easily create (and save) an advanced search that will > filter them out, while still being able to chec

Re: [gentoo-dev] Proctors Episode II - Attack of the clones

2007-04-18 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Wed, 2007-04-18 at 10:30 +0200, Wernfried Haas wrote: > blackace, jmbsvicetto, marienz, pilla and mark_alec. Are they at least wearing different color outfits so we can tell them apart? -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering Strategic Lead Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams Games Developer/C

Re: [gentoo-dev] Reply-To Munging [was Re: Re: baselayout-2 and volumes (raid, lvm, crypt, etc)]

2007-04-18 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Wed, 2007-04-18 at 06:11 +0100, Steve Long wrote: > After all it's a dev list, and assumes more knowledge than the user m-l so > asking people to use a client with Reply-To-List, iff they want to > participate, isn't a big deal imo. I agree 100%. The only list I would even consider using reply

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Fw: [gentoo-core] [POLICY] Keywording/Stabilizing Bug Assignment Policy

2007-04-18 Thread Matti Bickel
Stefan Schweizer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > They generate irrelevant information for me because I cannot help with > stabling. So I would love to have the possibility to -CC me there after > siging the stabling off. You are responsible for any failures discovered by arch teams while testing. Not

Re: [gentoo-dev] Proctors Episode II - Attack of the clones

2007-04-18 Thread Wernfried Haas
On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 10:30:33AM +0200, Wernfried Haas wrote: > All of them have a background in forums/#gentoo/userrel and hopefully > will help in bringing peace to this galaxy. JFTR, as this was probably poorly worded: Each of them belongs to at least one of those three groups, not all of the

[gentoo-dev] Proctors Episode II - Attack of the clones

2007-04-18 Thread Wernfried Haas
Hi everyone, I just returned from my trip to Kamino and brought back some new members for the proctors team: blackace, jmbsvicetto, marienz, pilla and mark_alec. All of them have a background in forums/#gentoo/userrel and hopefully will help in bringing peace to this galaxy. Luckily for all of us