Hi,
Attached is a draft of my API spec for my GLEP 27 implementation
(user/group management for package managers). Any feedback would be
appreciated. The latest version of this document can also be found in
my subversion repository[1]. Thanks!
[1] http://soc.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/*checkout*/glep0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ryan Hill wrote:
>
> So far the only difference between this and doing a query on b.g.o for
> maintainer-wanted is that it's on mailing list.
Which (as a side note), increase the flow of communication between
developers and users, giving an alternati
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bruno wrote:
>
> Through proxy-dev I may contribute ebuild for a few packages and maintain
> them
> over the time period I have use for them. E.g. drivers as long as I have
> given hardware (in use).
That is great!
>
> What would be useful is to
On Fri, 2006-07-28 at 22:20 +0200, Matthias Bethke wrote:
> no reply, opened a bug (#140242) some two weeks ago---still nothing.
Everything prior to this was unlikely to get a response. As for the
bug, two weeks is barely infancy for some bugs.
> Seems I'm not following some arcane protocol. I m
Luis Francisco Araujo wrote:
The 'modus-operandi' would go like this:
1 - We setup a mailing list (yes, yet another one, but this one is gonna
be useful!) , call it , [EMAIL PROTECTED] , or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2 - Developers interested to serve as a proxy , subscribe to the list.
3 - Users ask
Richard Fish wrote:
On 7/27/06, Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The "majority" of packages are also the ones that need more extensive
testing. Sure, we could probably stabilize a bunch of the fringe
packages that hardly anyone uses and it wouldn't affect anything.
The majority
On Fri, 28 Jul 2006 09:41:09 -0400
Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > That's actually how I read the first email, was that it's really
> > the majority of the _minor_ packages that get completely neglected,
> > and just sits in the tree for months or years marked unstable
> > becaus
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> (stuff)
"Me too!"
Seriously, you nailed it on the head. How many times have you had this
conversation:
u: "Why is it taking so *!#$!@ long to get KDE/Gnome/XFCE stabilized?!
Fedora/Debian/Ubuntu got it a whole week ago! OMG!!1!"
d: "It'll be stabilized once it's a
On Sat, 2006-07-29 at 15:07 +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> We're nearing the end of the nomination period.
>
> So far (if we are to trust
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~vapier/council-2006-nominees.xml) the following
> developers accepted their nomination :
>
>
> (Those developers should accept their
Errata for candidates list :
robbat2 self-nominated (so he probably also accepted)
UberLord accepted his nomination
-K
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
We're nearing the end of the nomination period.
So far (if we are to trust
http://dev.gentoo.org/~vapier/council-2006-nominees.xml) the following
developers accepted their nomination :
dostrow
Flameeyes
KingTaco
kloeri
Kugelfang
lu_zero
nattfodd
patrick
pauldv
Pylon
spb
vapier
wolf31o2
Those wer
On Saturday 29 July 2006 02:19, Alastair Tse wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-07-28 at 11:51 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > Robert Cernansky wrote:
> > > If I have some application that is not included in portage why
> > > I decide to make an ebuild? Because I hope that then it will be
> > > accepted and i
12 matches
Mail list logo
