Richard Fish wrote:
On 7/27/06, Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The "majority" of packages are also the ones that need more extensive testing. Sure, we could probably stabilize a bunch of the fringe packages that hardly anyone uses and it wouldn't affect anything.
The majority of Aliz's database seems to be made up of these "fringe" packages. Many of which are stable on at least one arch already, or have only a single version in the tree anyway. Stabilizing these on the remaining archs that they support should not have any significant impact on the perceived overall quality of Gentoo.
I was planning on working through the list some time in the near future. I have to finish filing GCC 4.1 stabilization bugs for half the tree first. ;)
--de. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
