On 10-02-2006 20:22:06 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Feb 2006 19:25:47 +0100 Grobian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | On 09-02-2006 23:50:08 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> | > On Thu, 9 Feb 2006 22:48:32 +0100 Grobian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> | > wrote:
> | > > Instead of proposing a 4-tup
Klaus-J. Wolf posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted
below, on Sat, 11 Feb 2006 03:37:25 +0100:
> Would you please discuss a GLEP draft, which I believe it might improve
> the usability of Gentoo?
>
> Text at:
>
> http://www.seismic.de/gentoo/gentoo_mask_proposal.html
I'm just a user, not a de
On 2/10/06, Klaus-J. Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am new to this list, but I am not new to Gentoo.
>
> Would you please discuss a GLEP draft, which I believe it might improve
> the usability of Gentoo?
>
> Text at:
>
> http://www.seismic.de/gentoo/gentoo_mask_proposal.html
Seems lik
Hi,
I am new to this list, but I am not new to Gentoo.
Would you please discuss a GLEP draft, which I believe it might improve
the usability of Gentoo?
Text at:
http://www.seismic.de/gentoo/gentoo_mask_proposal.html
Technical details still missing...
Regards
k.j.
ps. I can also post the t
This is a heads up for anyone that hasn't seen the notices placed in
various places...
On March 1, the old-style configuration of apache will no longer be
supported, in favor of the new-style configuration which was marked
stable back in October. If you haven't upgraded, now is the time to do
so.
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 11:27:56 +0100
Marius Mauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Dec 2005 17:04:53 +0100
> Marius Mauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > As promised here the GLEP for Manifest2 support:
> > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0044.html
> >
> > This will NOT
On Friday 10 February 2006 22:05, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> See, you're saying "two should be enough" and then special casing when
> two isn't enough. Why not just go for "two is usually enough, but use
> three where necessary"?
On Friday 10 February 2006 01:44, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> "
On Fri, 10 Feb 2006 21:44:11 +0100 "Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| On Friday 10 February 2006 21:22, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| > kfreebsd-gnu is, in effect, one example you're using already. You'd
| > have x86 as the arch, FreeBSD as the kernel and GNU as the userland.
|
| x
On Friday 10 February 2006 21:22, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> kfreebsd-gnu is, in effect, one example you're using already. You'd have
> x86 as the arch, FreeBSD as the kernel and GNU as the userland.
x86-kfbsd
I can't see other kfbsd cases for now.
--
Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://dev.gentoo.
On Fri, 10 Feb 2006 19:25:47 +0100 Grobian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| On 09-02-2006 23:50:08 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| > On Thu, 9 Feb 2006 22:48:32 +0100 Grobian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| > wrote:
| > > Instead of proposing a 4-tuple [3]_ keyword, a 2-tuple
| > > keyword is chosen for archs th
On Fri, 10 Feb 2006 10:14:26 -0500 Chris Gianelloni
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| On Fri, 2006-02-10 at 03:17 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| > On Thu, 09 Feb 2006 22:05:35 -0500 Ned Ludd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| > wrote:
| > | The words AUXFILE EBUILD MISCFILE DISTFILE could be using shorter
| > | nam
Hello Jakub
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 10:33:52AM +0100, Jakub Moc wrote:
> GTK-based LDAP client. This thing has no maintainer, is broken and dead
> upstream (unmaintained, last release 2+ ago).
I don't think it makes huge sense to keep it, even if it worked for me
for the last three years or so. U
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
10.2.2006, 20:03:45, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
>> Olivier Crete wrote:
>> Is there any other useful gtk ldap browser in the tree ?
> There's a bug for LAT -- http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86854 --
> but the current assignee apparently doesn't
Olivier Crête wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-10-02 at 10:33 +0100, Jakub Moc wrote:
>> Otherwise, I suggest to p.mask this in two weeks and then remove from
>> portage.
>
> Is there any other useful gtk ldap browser in the tree ?
There's a bug for LAT -- http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86854 --
but
On 10-02-2006 01:30:40 -0700, Duncan wrote:
> Grobian posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted below, on
> Thu, 09 Feb 2006 22:48:32 +0100:
>
> > .. [3] For the purpose of readability, we will refer to 1, 2 and
> >4-tuples, even though tuple in itself suggest a field consisting of
> >two val
On 10-02-2006 11:00:33 +0100, Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten wrote:
> On Friday 10 February 2006 09:00, Kevin F. Quinn (Gentoo) wrote:
> > Could you add a definition of 'safe' to the GLEP? It's not clear what
> > this means at the moment.
> "Variables that can be counted on, as users can't change them i
On 10-02-2006 00:38:47 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Thu, 09 Feb 2006 19:26:11 -0500 Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Assuming the CHOST variable is 'safe' is not a good thing, users can
> > over-ride this variable. Can you specify some behavior when it's set
> > to something bogu
On 09-02-2006 23:50:08 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Feb 2006 22:48:32 +0100 Grobian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Instead of proposing a 4-tuple [3]_ keyword, a 2-tuple
> > keyword is chosen for archs that require them.
>
> Provision should be made for future ports that require more
10.2.2006, 14:56:58, Olivier Crete wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-10-02 at 10:33 +0100, Jakub Moc wrote:
>> Otherwise, I suggest to p.mask this in two weeks and then remove from
>> portage.
> Is there any other useful gtk ldap browser in the tree ?
Not that I would know... Anyway, nls can be fixed by us
On Fri, 2006-02-10 at 03:17 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Thu, 09 Feb 2006 22:05:35 -0500 Ned Ludd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | The words AUXFILE EBUILD MISCFILE DISTFILE could be using shorter
> | names such as AUX EBD MSC DST like the existing vdb CONTENTS
> | files does for objects dirs a
On Thu, 2006-02-09 at 22:39 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Thursday 09 February 2006 22:05, Ned Ludd wrote:
> > I would like to see it drop the tab handling for indicating newlines
> > and just use a real newlines when we want a newline.
> >
> > While having the tabs makes it easier for people t
On Fri, 2006-10-02 at 10:33 +0100, Jakub Moc wrote:
> Otherwise, I suggest to p.mask this in two weeks and then remove from
> portage.
Is there any other useful gtk ldap browser in the tree ?
--
Olivier Crête
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Duncan Coutts wrote:
nhc98 is a Haskell compiler.
This package has been masked for several months because its memory
management system makes assumptions that are no longer true on 2.6
kernels. This is not easily fixable and the upstream devs no not have
the time or inclination to rewrite the run
This package provides a simple graphics library for use with the hugs98
Haskell interpreter.
It doesn't work with the older versions of hugs98 that are in portage.
While it does work with newer versions of hugs98 it is unnecessary there
because they come bundled with an updated version of the same
nhc98 is a Haskell compiler.
This package has been masked for several months because its memory
management system makes assumptions that are no longer true on 2.6
kernels. This is not easily fixable and the upstream devs no not have
the time or inclination to rewrite the runtime system. See also #
Hey kids,
It's always something...perl-5.8.8 (~arch) is our first perl install
that correctly utilizes /usr/lib64. In itself, a good thing, but the
@INC that gets generated is geared towards /usr/lib64 (still a good
thing), but as such perl-cleaner gets confused because your old perl
modul
On Fri, 10 Feb 2006 01:30:40 -0700
Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK, despite the given reasoning, I found this distracting. Perhaps
> this is one of Ciaran's English readability suggestions, but is there
> a reason not to s/segment/tuple/g ? That seems to me more accurate,
> "segment" is m
On Friday 10 February 2006 09:00, Kevin F. Quinn (Gentoo) wrote:
> Could you add a definition of 'safe' to the GLEP? It's not clear what
> this means at the moment.
"Variables that can be counted on, as users can't change them in unexpectable
ways without hacking the tree" :)
--
Diego "Flameeye
For those who wonder wth is that... Description: DyBASE is very simple
object oriented embedded database for languages with dynamic type checking.
The ebuild lacks a maintainer, is completely bogus and fubar, a.k.a. doesn't
work at all and needs complete rewrite to work with dev-lang/php. The same
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
GTK-based LDAP client. This thing has no maintainer, is broken and dead
upstream (unmaintained, last release 2+ ago).
If anyone still wants to keep it in portage, see
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122336 for the outstanding issues.
Otherwise
Grobian posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted below, on
Thu, 09 Feb 2006 22:48:32 +0100:
> .. [3] For the purpose of readability, we will refer to 1, 2 and
>4-tuples, even though tuple in itself suggest a field consisting of
>two values. For clarity: a 1-tuple describes a single value fi
31 matches
Mail list logo
