On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 18:58:52 -0800 Donnie Berkholz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Marcelo Góes wrote:
| > Indeed, logrotate functionality should be optional. Ebuilds that
| > install logrotate stuff without asking should be updated to use the
| > logrotate USE flag.
| >
| > I'm making it a global US
William Hubbs wrote:
I don't really like the install_mask idea for this because you can't set
that on a per-package basis that I am aware of, and we have several
packages that have an xinetd use flag.
Why would you want it on a per-package basis?
Thanks,
Donnie
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Jan 28, 2006 at 08:33:26PM -0500, Doug Goldstein wrote:
> How about the packages that don't even ask and just install logrotate
> stuff? Like Apache, lighttpd, and mysql?
What about xinetd? The same thing is happening there. I have some
file
On Saturday 28 January 2006 12:39, Stephen P. Becker wrote:
> > On second thought, never mind :) I am not sure what you are trying to
> > point out here in the first place.
>
> He is trying (quite successfully) to show that you are full of shit.
In this particular case, I might have to agree wit
Reposting since I don't think my last e-mail got through...
On 1/29/06, Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> People who don't want it can set INSTALL_MASK. It should be installed by
> default and not switchable with a USE flag.
If INSTALL_MASK is the correct way to prevent logrotate stuff
Marcelo Góes wrote:
> It seems there are some ebuilds with a logrotate USE flag:
> Perhaps it should be a global USE flag?
We have discussed this "fairly recently"[1] so I'll post the link to
save everyone the hassle.
[1] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=gentoo-dev&w=2&r=1&s=logrotate&q=b
>
>
Marcelo Góes wrote:
Indeed, logrotate functionality should be optional. Ebuilds that
install logrotate stuff without asking should be updated to use the
logrotate USE flag.
I'm making it a global USE flag if nobody complains.
You want people to recompile the whole package to get another text f
On 1/28/06, Francesco Riosa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Doug Goldstein wrote:
> > How about the packages that don't even ask and just install logrotate
> > stuff? Like Apache, lighttpd, and mysql?
> >
>
> they should use it, MySQL will be updated when Marcelo make "logrotate"
> uf global
Indeed,
Doug Goldstein wrote:
> Marcelo Góes wrote:
>> It seems there are some ebuilds with a logrotate USE flag:
>>
>> use.local.desc:34:app-backup/bacula:logrotate - Install support files
>> for logrotate
>> use.local.desc:550:mail-filter/dspam:logrotate - Install support files
>> for logrotate
>> use.lo
Marcelo Góes wrote:
> It seems there are some ebuilds with a logrotate USE flag:
>
> use.local.desc:34:app-backup/bacula:logrotate - Install support files
> for logrotate
> use.local.desc:550:mail-filter/dspam:logrotate - Install support files
> for logrotate
> use.local.desc:899:net-ftp/vsftpd:lo
It seems there are some ebuilds with a logrotate USE flag:
use.local.desc:34:app-backup/bacula:logrotate - Install support files
for logrotate
use.local.desc:550:mail-filter/dspam:logrotate - Install support files
for logrotate
use.local.desc:899:net-ftp/vsftpd:logrotate - Use logrotate for rotati
MIkey wrote:
Paul de Vrieze wrote:
Using this flags on a freshly compiled stage3 (from a stage1, just running
emerge system without setting useflags) I get no blockers at all, when
setting the useflags at the point that system has been recompiled.
Depclean does suggest removing a number of pac
Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> Using this flags on a freshly compiled stage3 (from a stage1, just running
> emerge system without setting useflags) I get no blockers at all, when
> setting the useflags at the point that system has been recompiled.
>
> Depclean does suggest removing a number of packages
On 1/28/06, Grobian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The question here now actually is: "is csh worth the hassle, or not?"
> My opinion is that it is not.
csh_is_not_worth_it++;
It is causing trouble and not adding functionality. Unless there are
cases where tcsh is not backwards compatible, I say it
On Sat, 2006-01-28 at 17:09 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 16:51:20 + (UTC) Markus Dittrich
> |
> | My apologies, that should have been Mar[ck]uses!
>
> No, that would be Marci. Now write it down a hundred times. If it's not
> done by sunrise, I'll cut your balls off.
No
Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> Using this flags on a freshly compiled stage3 (from a stage1, just running
> emerge system without setting useflags) I get no blockers at all, when
> setting the useflags at the point that system has been recompiled.
Are you suggesting that on fresh installs, after editing
On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 16:51:20 + (UTC) Markus Dittrich
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| On Sat, 28 Jan 2006, Marcus D. Hanwell wrote:
| > On Saturday 28 January 2006 16:34, Markus Dittrich wrote:
| > > Good to have some more Markuses on the team :)
| > > Welcome!
| >
| > Am I the only one who spells
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> On Saturday 28 January 2006 12:37, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Please welcome Markus to the team.
> Hi Markus! :)
Welcome Markus :)
> use repoman || die
>
> [This time it was the case to use this lame joke, right? :)]
" - Kaboom?"
" - Yes Rico, kaboom."
--
K
On Saturday 28 January 2006 16:34, Markus Dittrich wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Please welcome Markus to the team.
>
> Good to have some more Markuses on the team :)
> Welcome!
>
> cheers,
> Markus
Am I the only one who spells it properly? :D
pgpfrwzFPfDxr.pgp
Descri
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 28 Jan 2006, Marcus D. Hanwell wrote:
> On Saturday 28 January 2006 16:34, Markus Dittrich wrote:
> > Good to have some more Markuses on the team :)
> > Welcome!
>
> Am I the only one who spells it properly? :D
>
My apologies, that should ha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Please welcome Markus to the team.
>
Good to have some more Markuses on the team :)
Welcome!
cheers,
Markus
- --
Markus Dittrich (markusle)
Gentoo Linux Developer
Scientific applications
-BEGI
On Thursday 26 January 2006 16:40, Mikey wrote:
> On Thursday 26 January 2006 08:12, Chris Gianelloni spammed:
> > Something else that *everybody* seems to be missing is that the *first*
> > method in the GCC upgrading guide, which is the one that would apply
> > from a fresh-installed system, seem
On 28-01-2006 01:47:27 -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 28, 2006 at 12:05:30PM +0300, Peter Volkov (pva) wrote:
> > To solve symlink problem I can suggest the following.
> Rather than handling it manually, perhaps eselect can help handle it
> consistently, and allow users to switch when
On Friday 27 January 2006 16:32, MIkey wrote:
> Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> > Would you mind sharing the useflags you mean, and which packages you want
> > to build? It might be bugs in the packages involved.
>
> My standard USE flags for building a lamp server. No X, no cruft.
>
> USE="-X -alsa -apm
On 28-01-2006 09:38:05 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 10:31:55 +0100 Grobian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | In fact, I'd like to have only sh, because I never use bash.
>
> How did you become a Gentoo developer?
Guess I forgot to put the word 'interactively' at the end of tha
On Sat, 2006-01-28 at 12:37 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Please welcome Markus to the team.
... and once again a candidate for the one and only German conspiracy :)
Welcome aboard, Markus!
wkr,
Tobias
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Saturday 28 January 2006 10:47, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> Rather than handling it manually, perhaps eselect can help handle it
> consistently, and allow users to switch when they have both csh and
> tcsh installed.
I started working on something like that for gtar/bsdtar, but I found that I
don
On Saturday 28 January 2006 12:37, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Please welcome Markus to the team.
Hi Markus! :)
use repoman || die
[This time it was the case to use this lame joke, right? :)]
--
Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://dev.gentoo.org/~flameeyes/
Gentoo/ALT lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Please welcome Markus to the team.
Welcome to the team! :-)
--
Sandro (Sanchan)
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
heya,
On Saturday 28 January 2006 11:37, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Please welcome Markus to the team.
Great to have you onboard Markus. Welcome :)
--
Benjamin Smee (strerror)
net-mail/netmon/forensics/crypto
Fingerprint: 497F 5E98 1FA0 C313 EA0B 08C7 004A 66ED 448B E78C
pgpcJ3zjS50kH.pgp
De
Hi all.
Markus has been contributing to gentoo through bugzilla and bugdays for
a few months and have now finally joined the ranks of official Gentoo
developers. Markus is going to help with netmon related ebuilds.
Markus tells us about himself:
"I'm a 23 year old geek, trying to spread linux ar
On Sat, Jan 28, 2006 at 12:05:30PM +0300, Peter Volkov (pva) wrote:
> To solve symlink problem I can suggest the following.
Rather than handling it manually, perhaps eselect can help handle it
consistently, and allow users to switch when they have both csh and
tcsh installed.
--
Robin Hugh Johnso
On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 10:31:55 +0100 Grobian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| In fact, I'd like to have only sh, because I never use bash.
How did you become a Gentoo developer?
--
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (King of all Londinium)
Mail: ciaranm at gentoo.org
Web : http
On 28-01-2006 12:05:30 +0300, Peter Volkov (pva) wrote:
> On Срд, 2006-01-25 at 20:57 +0100, Grobian wrote:
> > Are there any objections to removing csh from the tree? If there are no
> > problems with csh removal before Feb 1st 2006, then I will starting from
> > that date work on getting csh rem
On Срд, 2006-01-25 at 20:57 +0100, Grobian wrote:
> Are there any objections to removing csh from the tree? If there are no
> problems with csh removal before Feb 1st 2006, then I will starting from
> that date work on getting csh removed by masking it, blocking tcsh and
> csh, and request for upd
35 matches
Mail list logo
