On Sunday 15 January 2006 01:19, Joshua Baergen wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > - portage will add sane debug defaults to make.globals (DEBUG_CFLAGS="-O
> > -g" and DEBUG_LDFLAGS="")
>
> Nothing huge, but won't this fry certain systems (SPARC iirc, among
> others) that need the -march informatio
Mike Frysinger wrote:
- portage will add sane debug defaults to make.globals (DEBUG_CFLAGS="-O -g"
and DEBUG_LDFLAGS="")
Nothing huge, but won't this fry certain systems (SPARC iirc, among
others) that need the -march information for the code to even run? If
so, the solution would have to g
this topic has come up before too many times and has yet to be solved, and we
have too many hacks in place
the issues:
- USE=debug is way too vague; sometimes it builds different code (i.e.
additional runtime checks, debugging output, yada yada) and sometimes it
forces debugging gcc flags into
sanchan wrote:
Hi all, I'm working on TinyOS related ebuilds (Bug #78908) and since
actually there are 20 ebuilds in my overlay may be worth proposing a
dev-tos category.
It will take a few weeks in order to have all the ebuilds updated for
the new release of tinyos, have them reviewed by peer
On Sunday 15 January 2006 00:33, Kalin KOZHUHAROV wrote:
> Not sure how does the new tetex handle i18n, but less than a year ago I had
> to use ptex to write Japanese (in euc-jp, AFAIR). There was some rumble
> about UTF-8 support, but did it get in?
Yes, UTF-8 in tetex3 works fine, at least for me
Alexandre Buisse wrote:
> Hi,
>
> for all of you who have been using latex on gentoo, here are some news
> on what is currently happening.
A news is a good news, glad that there is something happening.
> First of all, we have a new tetex (tetex-3.0_p1). It should have hit the
> mirrors this morni
For those that use the earch tool, I've written a new version that has
support for SLOTs as well as masked packages (profiles, p.mask, missing
keywords - any masking supported by portage).
http://dev.gentoo.org/~robbat2/earch-0.3
Try it on sys-devel/gcc for example, where there are presently 7 sl
On Saturday 14 January 2006 13:41, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> | yes, but fbsd is a self hosting env, tinyos is not
> |
> | i wish there was a way we could convey the embedded aspect (embed-tos
>
> ?), but
>
> | dev-tos works for me
>
> Why stuck on "tos" -- Just spend the othe
On Sat, 14 Jan 2006 14:24:22 +0100
Alexandre Buisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> (snip)
>
> And, last but not least, a LaTeX doc began. It's still a very early
> draft but any (constructive) criticism and help is most welcome. The
> discussion happens in bug #118405 and the last draft can be fou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Frysinger wrote:
| yes, but fbsd is a self hosting env, tinyos is not
|
| i wish there was a way we could convey the embedded aspect (embed-tos
?), but
| dev-tos works for me
Why stuck on "tos" -- Just spend the other 3 letters and make it tinyo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alexandre Buisse wrote:
| Hi,
|
| for all of you who have been using latex on gentoo, here are some news
| on what is currently happening.
|
| First of all, we have a new tetex (tetex-3.0_p1). It should have hit the
| mirrors this morning. This is not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
sanchan wrote:
| Alexandre Buisse wrote:
|
|>I don't know TinyOS, but I assume it is a "toy OS", like minix and
many others.
|>What about a dev-toyos category? It could be great to have some other
|>toy OS, including the one I have been working on (fu
On Saturday 14 January 2006 08:47, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Jan 2006 09:32:49 +0100 sanchan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | Hi all, I'm working on TinyOS related ebuilds (Bug #78908) and since
> | actually there are 20 ebuilds in my overlay may be worth proposing a
> | dev-tos category. I
On Saturday 14 January 2006 10:26, Bruno wrote:
> What are your thoughts about this?
take it upstream, they have a bugzilla
make it a configure option and we'll add a use flag `use_enable vserver` or
some such junk
otherwise, the answer is no ;)
-mike
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
I'm currently modifying an initng install on one of my vserver guest (in a way
similar to base-layout-vserver) so that it can run out of the box on vserver
guests without hitting issues with all lowlevel tasks such as mounts and
kernel configuration.
I would think this could be useful to be add
I propose creating a new category, sci-visualization, to house scientific
visualization applications. There are at least 17 applications I have
identified which are already in the tree that could be moved. Many of them
are in media-gfx with photo applications etc. They are all taken care of by
On Saturday 14 January 2006 13:24, Alexandre Buisse wrote:
> for all of you who have been using latex on gentoo, here are some news
> on what is currently happening.
>
> First of all, we have a new tetex (tetex-3.0_p1). It should have hit the
> mirrors this morning. This is not an official release
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 14 Jan 2006, Alexandre Buisse wrote:
Hi,
for all of you who have been using latex on gentoo, here are some news
on what is currently happening.
First of all, we have a new tetex (tetex-3.0_p1). It should have hit the
mirrors this morning.
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> Any reason for dev- rather than sys-? I believe we're going with
> sys-fbsd...
The only reason is that until yesterday TinyOS was targeted for dev-embedded.
TinyOS is a small operating system for embedded sensors, it's very different
from linux or fbsd.
--
Sandro (Sanchan
On Sat, 14 Jan 2006 09:32:49 +0100 sanchan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Hi all, I'm working on TinyOS related ebuilds (Bug #78908) and since
| actually there are 20 ebuilds in my overlay may be worth proposing a
| dev-tos category. It will take a few weeks in order to have all the
| ebuilds updated
Alexandre Buisse wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 13:44:52 +0100, sanchan wrote:
>
>
>>Hi all, I'm working on TinyOS related ebuilds (Bug #78908) and since
>>actually there are 20 ebuilds in my overlay may be worth proposing a
>>dev-tos category.
>>It will take a few weeks in order to have all
Hi,
for all of you who have been using latex on gentoo, here are some news
on what is currently happening.
First of all, we have a new tetex (tetex-3.0_p1). It should have hit the
mirrors this morning. This is not an official release from upstream
(that would be 3.1) but a snapshot of their devel
Alexandre Buisse wrote:
> I don't know TinyOS, but I assume it is a "toy OS", like minix and many
> others.
> What about a dev-toyos category? It could be great to have some other
> toy OS, including the one I have been working on (funk, see
> http://home.gna.org/funk/), but also, if licences allo
On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 13:44:52 +0100, sanchan wrote:
> Hi all, I'm working on TinyOS related ebuilds (Bug #78908) and since
> actually there are 20 ebuilds in my overlay may be worth proposing a
> dev-tos category.
> It will take a few weeks in order to have all the ebuilds updated for the
>
Hi all, I'm working on TinyOS related ebuilds (Bug #78908) and since actually
there are 20 ebuilds in my overlay may be worth proposing a dev-tos category.
It will take a few weeks in order to have all the ebuilds updated for the new
release of tinyos, have them reviewed by peer an committed to t
On Saturday 14 January 2006 00:45, Simon Stelling wrote:
> Right after RESTRICT=lamejokes is implemented :P
You can't restrict me ;)
--
Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://dev.gentoo.org/~flameeyes/
Gentoo/ALT lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, AMD64, Sound, PAM, KDE
pgpbxYEUijJiC.pgp
Description: PGP
On 1/11/06, Aron Griffis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bug 9849 has been marked a duplicate of 23851, but there is
> a distinction between the two: 23851 would be "solved" by pre-failing
> the merge phase if it is predicted to fail (permissions, diskspace).
> But 9849 is pretty specific to .keep fil
27 matches
Mail list logo
