* Bret Towe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-12-21 23:16]:
> On 12/21/05, Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > > I know some of you have done research on how gentoo-x86 converts over to
> > > other systems besides CVS such as SVN, arch, etc. But I can't find the
> > >
On 12/21/05, Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > I know some of you have done research on how gentoo-x86 converts over to
> > other systems besides CVS such as SVN, arch, etc. But I can't find the
> > info anywhere in my archives.
> >
> > Could whoever's got it,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'd appreciate some ideas better than what I've come up with so far to
deal with the very strange X.Org release naming.
When modular tarballs are part of a full X.Org release (7.0, 7.1, etc),
then they are named PN-PV-XORG_RELEASE.tar.(gz|bz2) and S
On Tuesday 20 December 2005 02:55, Duncan wrote:
> What about doing with xml what was done with gtk, when gtk2 was
> deprecated? IOW, where both are possible, default to one or the other,
> which ever one is merged, or choose one (preferably making it a
> Gentoo-wide default, for consistency) if b
Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Hello here,
>
> the virtual/ thingy broke the deptree again with virtual/libstdc++ (see Bug
> 116253), essentially the same issue like with virtual/x11. These virtuals
> need to go straight stable if any of their RDEPEND atoms is stable for a
> particular arch
On Wed, 21 Dec 2005 15:28:03 -0600
Mike Doty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> All-
>
> Please take a moment to welcome our newest developer, pva. Peter is
> joining to help out with netmon.
>
> In his own words, "I was born in Moscow (it's in Rus
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 11:24:10PM +0100, George Shapovalov wrote:
> Um, I cannot remind why we did not split, because I remember (unless I am
> hallucinating of course. That was like 2 years ago, or more..) that we
> actually had them split and then they were joined.. For whatever it is
> worth
Um, I cannot remind why we did not split, because I remember (unless I am
hallucinating of course. That was like 2 years ago, or more..) that we
actually had them split and then they were joined.. For whatever it is
worth..
As for reasons, not really sure, did not check at the time (as I did not
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 03:28:03PM -0600, Mike Doty wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> All-
>
> Please take a moment to welcome our newest developer, pva. Peter is
> joining to help out with netmon.
Time to start a Russian conspiracy! Dobro pozhalovat'.
--
Renat Lump
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
All-
Please take a moment to welcome our newest developer, pva. Peter is
joining to help out with netmon.
In his own words, "I was born in Moscow (it's in Russia). I graduated
physical department of Moscow State University. And my speciality is
phys
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
I know some of you have done research on how gentoo-x86 converts over to
other systems besides CVS such as SVN, arch, etc. But I can't find the
info anywhere in my archives.
Could whoever's got it, post it?
I'm particularly interested in hearing about CVS, SVN, mercurial,
came someone please remind me why we havent split the tcltk USE flag
into tcl and tk ? wanting tcl support on a server makes sense, and
doing something like 'tcltk? ( X? ( tk ) )' is just dumb
-mike
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 11:36:43PM +0300, Vadim Konovalov wrote:
> I've noticed wrong homepage specified for tclpython (shoud be
> http://jfontain.free.fr/tclpython.htm )
use http://bugs.gentoo.org/
> Also, I want Perl module for Tcl/Tk interconnection to be available
> within as ebuild.
use htt
Vadim Konovalov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I've noticed wrong homepage specified for tclpython (shoud be
> http://jfontain.free.fr/tclpython.htm )
Please file a bug on https://bugs.gentoo.org
> Also, I want Perl module for Tcl/Tk interconnection to be available
> within as ebuild. Module is name
I've noticed wrong homepage specified for tclpython (shoud be
http://jfontain.free.fr/tclpython.htm )
gevad ~ # emerge -s tclpython
Searching...
[ Results for search key : tclpython ]
[ Applications found : 1 ]
* dev-tcltk/tclpython
Latest version available: 3.1
Latest version insta
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 09:33:14PM +0200, Petteri R??ty wrote:
> What I don't remember is if we
> set some kind of policy then, but best to put this issue on the table
> well before New Year so that everyone will be aware of what to do when
> the time comes.
we did
the policy is that you only upd
# Copyright 1999-2005 Gentoo Foundation
# Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2
# $Header: $
I remember last year the mirror system having problems when some people
went and changed tons of ebuild headers. What I don't remember is if we
set some kind of policy then, but
Mark Loeser wrote:
> Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
>>Hello here,
>>
>>the virtual/ thingy broke the deptree again with virtual/libstdc++ (see Bug
>>116253), essentially the same issue like with virtual/x11. These virtuals
>>need to go straight stable if any of their RDEPEND atoms is stable
On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 19:25 +0200, Petteri Räty wrote:
> I just marked 2.0.53 stable on x86. See
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108082 for details. You can check
> the various dependencies of this bug for the bug fixes that went into
> this release. This release includes at least one new
Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Hello here,
>
> the virtual/ thingy broke the deptree again with virtual/libstdc++ (see Bug
> 116253), essentially the same issue like with virtual/x11. These virtuals
> need to go straight stable if any of their RDEPEND atoms is stable for a
> particular arch
On Wednesday 21 December 2005 19:28, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> IOW, it doesn't matter if an ~arch virtual depends on stable packages.
> It matters if stable packages depend on an ~arch virtual.
So that's like any other package in the tree..
--
Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://dev.gentoo.org/~fla
Jakub Moc wrote:
the virtual/ thingy broke the deptree again with virtual/libstdc++ (see Bug
116253), essentially the same issue like with virtual/x11. These virtuals
need to go straight stable if any of their RDEPEND atoms is stable for a
particular arch.
Shouldn't it be the reverse? Rather, t
> since we have baselayout-1.12.x in ~arch, the new stable candidate
> (1.11.14) isnt getting much air time ... can people try upgrading to
> it and post any feedback they have with it ? it should mostly be a
> bugfix release over 1.11.13 since we arent doing any more real features
> for the 1.11
I just marked 2.0.53 stable on x86. See
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108082 for details. You can check
the various dependencies of this bug for the bug fixes that went into
this release. This release includes at least one new program.
pena jamvm # emaint --help
usage: emaint [options] al
On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 14:45 +, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 09:30:56AM -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 13:13 +, Roy Marples wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 21 December 2005 12:49, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 14:36 +, Mike F
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 09:30:56AM -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 13:13 +, Roy Marples wrote:
> > On Wednesday 21 December 2005 12:49, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 14:36 +, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > > since we have baselayout-1.12.x in ~arch,
On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 14:26 +, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 07:49:37AM -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 14:36 +, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > since we have baselayout-1.12.x in ~arch, the new stable candidate
> > > (1.11.14) isnt getting much air ti
On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 13:13 +, Roy Marples wrote:
> On Wednesday 21 December 2005 12:49, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 14:36 +, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > since we have baselayout-1.12.x in ~arch, the new stable candidate
> > > (1.11.14) isnt getting much air time ... c
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 07:49:37AM -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 14:36 +, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > since we have baselayout-1.12.x in ~arch, the new stable candidate
> > (1.11.14) isnt getting much air time ... can people try upgrading to
> > it and post any feedback t
On Wednesday 21 December 2005 12:49, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 14:36 +, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > since we have baselayout-1.12.x in ~arch, the new stable candidate
> > (1.11.14) isnt getting much air time ... can people try upgrading to
> > it and post any feedback they h
On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 14:36 +, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> since we have baselayout-1.12.x in ~arch, the new stable candidate
> (1.11.14) isnt getting much air time ... can people try upgrading to
> it and post any feedback they have with it ? it should mostly be a
> bugfix release over 1.11.13 si
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> Better to use the correct list:
>
> $ metascan -av IUSE xml IUSE xml2
> Generating package list ... done
> Scanning packages for ['IUSE', 'IUSE'] ... done
>
> media-libs/libwmf-0.2.8.3-r1
> net-fs/samba-3.0.20-r1
> net-fs/samba-3.0.14a-r3
> net-f
Hello here,
the virtual/ thingy broke the deptree again with virtual/libstdc++ (see Bug
116253), essentially the same issue like with virtual/x11. These virtuals
need to go straight stable if any of their RDEPEND atoms is stable for a
particular arch.
Betelgeuse is working on a repoman check for
On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 14:36 +, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> since we have baselayout-1.12.x in ~arch, the new stable candidate
> (1.11.14) isnt getting much air time ... can people try upgrading to
> it and post any feedback they have with it ? it should mostly be a
> bugfix release over 1.11.13 si
34 matches
Mail list logo
