Jakub Moc wrote:
the virtual/ thingy broke the deptree again with virtual/libstdc++ (see Bug 116253), essentially the same issue like with virtual/x11. These virtuals need to go straight stable if any of their RDEPEND atoms is stable for a particular arch.
Shouldn't it be the reverse? Rather, they need to go stable if anything depending on them is stable.
IOW, it doesn't matter if an ~arch virtual depends on stable packages. It matters if stable packages depend on an ~arch virtual.
Thanks, Donnie -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
