[gentoo-dev] Handling of bindnow flags, Gentoo/ALT compatible version

2005-10-09 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
Hi everybody, I passed this on gentoo-alt and seemed to be ok for everyone, as it doesn't change anything for the end users on Gentoo Linux and is the minimum change possible. As you can find on Gentoo/ALT maintainers notes [1] under "Linkers issues", Gentoo/ALT is moving toward accepting non-

Re: [gentoo-dev] Python setuptools/eggs

2005-10-09 Thread Dave Nebinger
> > I've been working on an eclass for these but its not ready. > > I was hoping it'd be as easy as the Ruby gems eclass, because > > they are similar, but eggs don't play nicely in a sandbox yet. > > But aren't eggs a bit against the Gentoo philosophy? I mean there are > some eggs that contain pre

[gentoo-dev] Please test vim-6.4_beta

2005-10-09 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
Vim users, please give vim-6.4_beta a go. Vim 6.4 will be released in a week or so, and it's likely going to be the last 6.x branch release. It'd be nice to get any bugs ironed out before then... It's just vim 6.3.90 with an updated runtime snapshot and a broken Makefile. Feature requests for the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Python setuptools/eggs

2005-10-09 Thread Anders Bruun Olsen
On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 03:45:18PM -0700, Rob Cakebread wrote: > >How should Portage handle this? > I've been working on an eclass for these but its not ready. > I was hoping it'd be as easy as the Ruby gems eclass, because > they are similar, but eggs don't play nicely in a sandbox yet. But aren'