Re: [VOTE] Pig graduation to hadoop subproject

+1 Daniel - Original Message - From: "Olga Natkovich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: ; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, October 06, 2008 6:32 PM Subject: [VOTE] Pig graduation to hadoop subproject Pig Developers and Mentors, Pig has bee

Re: ANNOUNCE: SpamAssassin working to join Apache Software Foundation

.html It must have been moved which is not good since we've been using that URL in our CLA request emails to people. A copy is here: http://www.apache.org/licenses/cla.pdf Daniel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fo

Re: contributions and CLAs

ivative and who are not committers. Daniel -- Daniel Quinlan anti-spam (SpamAssassin), Linux, http://www.pathname.com/~quinlan/and open source consulting - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For addi

Re: [Proposal] Switch to SVN

rwise just do it. It's that nice. Daniel -- Daniel Quinlan http://www.pathname.com/~quinlan/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [STATUS] (incubator) Wed Sep 29 23:45:23 EDT 2004

r can be the private club. #asf could then have a list of other channels in the welcome message and/or topic. Daniel -- Daniel Quinlan ApacheCon! 13-17 November (3 SpamAssassin http://www.pathname.com/~quinlan/ http://www.apache

Re: Incubator PMC chair.

Could someone tell us more about this PMC chair vacancy? -- Daniel Guermeur - [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1 512 241 8630 www.metadot.com - Open source Portal Server Download - http://www.metadot.com/metadot/index.pl?iid=2504 See live implementations at http://www.metadot.com/metadot/index.pl?iid=2528 At

Geronimo Developers

Hi, I'm a senior engineer who's very experienced with Java and J2EE server implementations. I was the architect behind BroadVision's Servlet and JSP container. I'd be interested in working on Geronimo(part time), if you have stuff for me to work on. I've attached a copy of my resume in case you

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Graduate Apache Curator as an Apache Top Level Project

On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 10:28:10AM -0400, Suresh Marru wrote: > We don't need to worry for this vote, but in general relying on voter's > statement is not a good idea. +1! (binding) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@i

Re: [VOTE] Usergrid BaaS Stack for Apache Incubator

ct (documented > here http://wiki.apache.org/cordova/ContributorWorkflow). > > === Issue Tracking === > JIRA Usergrid (USERGRID) > > === Other Resources === > None. > > > == Initial Committers == > > * Alberto Leal (Globo.com) > * Alex Karasulu (Apigee) > * Dave Johnson (Apige

Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] Apache Monitoring

f we can keep the name Baldr for our infrastructure. With regards, Daniel. > > Tammo > Am 25.09.2013 01:18 schrieb "Olivier Lamy" : > >> So what about Baldr? >> BTW we can start incubation using Monitoring then change the name for TLP? >> WDYT? >&

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Allura (incubating) v1.0.1

and click on the Git tab, I get this: "Did you get asked for your SourceForge password during this process? You can securely use your Git repository and avoid having to re-enter your password by setting up an ssh-key." With regards, Daniel. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Allura (incubating) v1.0.1

On 11/08/2013 07:52 PM, Dave Brondsema wrote: > On 11/8/13 6:17 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote: >> On 11/04/2013 07:09 PM, Cory Johns wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> This is a call for a vote on Apache Allura 1.0.1 incubating. This is our >>> second attempt at an

Re: INFRA-6774

Joseph Schaefer wrote on Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 23:18:11 -0500: > > On Nov 19, 2013, at 10:50 PM, Joseph Schaefer wrote: > > > > > On Nov 19, 2013, at 10:40 PM, Jordan Zimmerman wrote: > > > >> Can someone please explain to me what I need to do to have > >> curator.incubator.apache.org redirec

Re: Github Permissions for Committers

hen it’s committed into Apache’s repo, we then comment on the pull request something to the effect of: “We’ve committed this into the Apache repo. Can you verify that the functionality works for you and, if so, close this pull request." 95% of the time, the user that submitted the request wi

Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator

g *convenience* here, it does not magically make doing all your work on GitHub legit). Having said that, I have yet to see someone step up and tell Infra "Hey, we need your help in doing this, how can we _collaborate_ on a solution?". So...please do. With regards, Daniel. I figured that would

Re: Github pull request hooks

We had a bit of a snafu on adding PR titles to the subject lines, but it's been taken care of now. With regards, Daniel. On 02/07/2014 09:57 PM, Henry Saputra wrote: > Ah looks like the missing PR title only happen for the emails > describing comments from the Github pull requests. &

Re: Github pull request hooks

the ML (such as jenkins workflows etc), but this will all depend on how this initial phase goes along. With regards, Daniel. On 02/07/2014 10:02 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote: > We had a bit of a snafu on adding PR titles to the subject lines, but > it's been taken care of now. > > With regar

Re: Github pull request hooks

whether we can support this or not. With regards, Daniel. On 02/10/2014 02:44 PM, Suresh Marru wrote: > Daniel & Jake, > > This is simply nice, appreciate your efforts in integrating this on a quick > turn around. Can I become more greedy and ask a follow on question/reques

Re: Github pull request hooks

s an old policy decision that I'm not going to go 180 on just yet. With regards, Daniel. On 02/10/2014 02:49 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote: > cc'ing infra, as this is really an infra topic. > Yes, it is possible - anything is possible, but it will require quite a > lot of work from Infra t

Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator

; Incubator Spark podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator > Project are hereafter discharged. > > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands,

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Allura 1.1.0 incubating

checked on multiple machines, and I get this error all the time. With regards, Daniel. On 02/13/2014 02:06 AM, Dave Brondsema wrote: > Hi everyone, > > This is a call for a vote on Apache Allura 1.1.0 incubating. This will be our > second release in the incubator. Allura is forge softw

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Allura 1.1.0 incubating

/16/14 6:28 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote: >> -1. files check out, but Allura doesn't work :( >> >> checksums match, installation works, though not very well on ubuntu >> minimal 13.10, dependencies cannot be met, I had to rewrite >> requiements-common.txt to use Min

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tez-0.4.0-incubating RC1

+1 (non-binding) Run Pig on Tez tests and the result is in line with what we expected. On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 9:21 AM, Jason Lowe wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > - verified signature and checksums > - built from source > - examined CHANGES, LICENSE, DISCLAIMER, NOTICE, BUILDING, and README files >

Re: Reports needing shepherd attention

ure reports why they, unusually, consider adding a feature to be a graduation blocker. > > The second example was that the answer to a question about how a > > community has developed doesn't depend on mail statistics (though might be > > aided by it), > > so the podlin

Re: Reports needing shepherd attention

Roman Shaposhnik wrote on Sat, May 31, 2014 at 23:39:06 -0700: > On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Daniel Shahaf > wrote: > >> Regardless, I guess my real question is this: if a podling feels that they > >> need to achieve a certain milestone in software completen

Re: [DISCUSS] json as new incubator project

so relax the naming problem, as it would most likely be >>> named >>>>> Apache Commons Json then. >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Christian >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>

Re: [VOTE] fleece as new incubator project

the Apache Git repository, under the following directory: > > - git.apache.org/incubator-fleece.git > > Issue Tracking > > The following JIRA project would be required to track issues for the Apache > Fleece project: > > - FLEECE > > Initial Committers >

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Argus Proposal

external mentor, but found one yet. >> >> .. Owen >> > So, from the peanut gallery; Do you want someone who knows _something_ about what your project is/does, or do you just need someone who knows about the inner workings of the ASF? If the

Re: Seeking interest and a champion for bifroest - a backend for graphite-web, on Apache Cassandra

me and my team through the > proposal and the incubator? Happy to help. My relevant experience is in the Apache Subversion development community. Daniel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apach

Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Falcon from the Incubator

t the community has grown and is ready for graduation rather than that you have resolved X number of issues :) With regards, Daniel. On 2014-11-05 14:54, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: By the way, please find: - an update about Falcon activity resulting to the discussion for the graduation: http:/

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenOffice Community Graduation Vote

Jim Jagielski wrote on Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 10:38:15 -0400: > After this, please drop general@ > > On Aug 27, 2012, at 10:16 AM, Rob Weir wrote: > > >> > >> A signature does 2 things: > >> > >> 1. Ensures that no bits have been changed > >> 2. That the bits come from a known (and trusted) en

Re: downloading external dependencies outside of svn.apache.org

Subversion did this prior to joining the ASF (so, up to 1.6.x inclusive). IIRC we stopped releasing -deps tarballs partially because libneon is LGPL. Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez wrote on Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 21:11:51 +0200: > Hi Joe, > > thanks for the insight :-) > > can you give one project w

Re: [VOTE] Stanbol to graduate from the incubator

the Apache > Incubator Stanbol podling; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache > Incubator Stanbol podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator > Project are hereafter discharged. > > > -- > Fabian >

Re: How to handle non-OS jars in repository

To clarify, are you saying that people download jars directly from version control history? Where do they find the references to their existence there? Noah Slater wrote on Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 22:41:53 +0100: > Hey, > > It came up on the CloudStack list that we have non-OS (I don't know the > s

Re: How to handle non-OS jars in repository

e's preparing a build. > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-cloudstack-dev/201209.mbox/%3ccc78b251.2ea43%25chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com%3E > > On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 10:46 PM, Daniel Shahaf > wrote: > > > To clarify, are you saying that people download jars directly

Re: How to handle non-OS jars in repository

academic concern (i.e. we've not released it, so it doesn't > matter) then okay. > > On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 11:02 PM, Daniel Shahaf > wrote: > > > Noah Slater wrote on Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 22:50:48 +0100: > > > In relation to the non-OS jars, Chir

Re: How to handle non-OS jars in repository

e them in > SVN. If it is not legal to redistribute, we should certainly delete > immediately from HEAD, and whether we do more than that would, I guess, > be up to the copyright holder (assuming they knew it was there at all). > > Upayavira > > On Sun, Sep 30, 2012, at 11:14 PM, Da

Re: How to handle non-OS jars in repository

Upayavira wrote on Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 13:26:00 +0100: > Note, podlings are free to check in IP that is dubious from a *policy* > perspective (i.e. incompatible with Apache License), but should not, as > I see it, check in anything that is dubious from a *legal* one (i.e. it > is not and should no

Re: How to handle non-OS jars in repository

an work out where, www.apache.org/legal/resolved , after legal@ consensus? > I'd be happy to write it up. > Cheers Daniel > Upayavira > > On Mon, Oct 1, 2012, at 01:35 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > Upayavira wrote on Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 13:26:00 +0100: > > > Note, pod

Re: New challenges (Was: NOMINATIONS for Incubator PMC Chair)

sses of the electorate (I think that's all; see ~voter/bin/make_issue.pl) No special karma is needed to start a vote. Daniel (BTW, I'm sure all PMC members know this, but for the benefit of other list readers I'll remind that the vote is for a _recommendation_ to the Apache Boar

Re: key signing

Benson Margulies wrote on Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 08:04:04 -0400: > Alternatively, since the chain is CLA -> svn access -> unsigned key in > svn, perhaps all we really need is to document that a signature > corresponding to a key in svn is really good enough, and users need > not be concerned further.

Re: key signing

Craig L Russell wrote on Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 08:59:26 -0700: > Hi Florian, > > On Oct 5, 2012, at 8:44 AM, Florian Holeczek wrote: > >> if I understood the Apache pseudonym rules right, the only one who >> would be able to sign such a key was secretary@, since it's the only >> one who knows th

Re: key signing

Benson Margulies wrote on Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 17:12:27 -0400: > Oh Secretary, why not create a 'role' PGP key and use it? Because it's harder to implement than to state, and no one has identified a need for it. - To unsubscribe,

Re: Podling name search - how do I contact the trademark team?

tradema...@apache.org (archives accessible to ASF Members only) Scott Wilson wrote on Sun, Oct 07, 2012 at 21:04:02 +0100: > One question - how do I do this? I can't find any mention of a mailing list > name to send the request to. ---

Re: key signing

Ian Holsman wrote on Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 10:53:11 +1100: > > On Oct 11, 2012, at 10:44 AM, Greg Stein wrote: > > > > > (assume secure Infrastructure) > > That's a pretty big assumption isn't it? > There have been public instances where open source infrastructures have been > hacked, and rele

Re: key signing

ersion control. > > All of the above is done via authenticated ASF accounts. The above > establishes an ASF release. > > Please explain how "keys" are needed for this ASF release? Consumers are > already told to verify the SHA1 and nothing more. I doubt any more is >

Re: key signing

Greg Stein wrote on Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 21:14:15 -0400: > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:10 PM, Daniel Shahaf > wrote: > > Greg Stein wrote on Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 19:44:30 -0400: > >> I've read this entire thread (whew!), and would actually like to throw out > >>

Re: key signing

Greg Stein wrote on Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 21:31:30 -0400: > Not too much. We still instruct users "take the signatures and verify > them against blah.apache.org/KEYS". John Blackhat could replace the > signatures and install his entry into KEYS. If you use https://people.apache.org/keys/ instead of

Re: key signing

Greg Stein wrote on Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 21:40:18 -0400: > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:35 PM, Daniel Shahaf > wrote: > > Greg Stein wrote on Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 21:14:15 -0400: > >... > >> My point is that our instructions to users don't really incorporoate >

Re: key signing

sebb wrote on Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 09:48:25 +0100: > On 11 October 2012 02:39, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > Greg Stein wrote on Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 21:31:30 -0400: > >> Not too much. We still instruct users "take the signatures and verify > >> them against blah.apach

Re: key signing

ing go find a local key-signing party to attend seems unrealistic. No one said that a release need have only one signature... 1) RM prepares tarball, signs, uploads for voting 2) voting passes 3) mentor appends his signature to the .asc file 4) artifacts posted to dist/ That solves the problem

Re: key signing

Marvin Humphrey wrote on Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 11:46:23 -0700: > In my opinion, general@incubator is an appropriate venue to explore ways in > which the system can be improved. That will necessarily mean talking about I am sure there are crypto minds in the ASF who aren't on general@incubator.

Re: Preparing for the October reports

sebb wrote on Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 04:08:53 +0100: > On 11 October 2012 22:30, David Crossley wrote: > > Rob Weir wrote: > >> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Benson Margulies > >> wrote: > >> > On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > >> >> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Jukka Zitt

${podling}.incubator.apache.org

Do people mind if web sites (and maybe mailing lists) of new podlings live at domains of the form "${podling}.incubator.apache.org"? This is in relation to infra work on streamlining TLP migrations. (Case in point: CMS TLP migrations.) This thread is about the externally-visible names, not about

Re: ${podling}.incubator.apache.org

sebb wrote on Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 13:05:06 +0100: > On 12 October 2012 08:31, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > Do people mind if web sites (and maybe mailing lists) of new podlings > > live at domains of the form "${podling}.incubator.apache.org"? > > > >

Re: ${podling}.incubator.apache.org

Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote on Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 16:36:20 +: > I would be +1 for simply ${podling}.apache.org, per: Infra doesn't have an opinion on this. I think it's technically possible. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: ge

Re: [VOTE] Retire the Kitty project from incubation

or Don't care > [ ] -1 for No, please keep it alive (please provide arguments why) > > Thanks, > > --kevan > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-m

Re: key signing

Dennis E. Hamilton wrote on Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 11:07:56 -0700: > . (I'm not sure > where this is fetched from, so I'm not sure how counter-signed versions Currently keys.gnupg.net https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/infrastructure/site/trunk/pe

Re: ${podling}.incubator.apache.org

Jukka Zitting wrote on Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 12:03:43 +0200: > Hi, > > On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Daniel Shahaf > wrote: > > Do people mind if web sites (and maybe mailing lists) of new podlings > > live at domains of the form "${podling}.incubator.apache.o

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Syncope podling from Apache Incubator

onsibilities pertaining to the Apache > Incubator Amber podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator > Project are hereafter discharged. > > -- > Francesco Chicchiriccò > > ASF Member, Apache Cocoon PMC and Apache Syncope PPMC Member > http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/ >

Re: Release procedural question

Chip Childers wrote on Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 14:27:24 -0400: > On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Chip Childers > wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > In reading the release policy section about the detached signature > > file and the voting process, there is a mention about allowing (at the > > RM's discretio

Re: Release procedural question

Chip Childers wrote on Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 14:47:33 -0400: > On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 2:44 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > In my experience, 'gpg --verify' sometimes verifies only the first > > signature in a file. > > It appears to function correctly now: ... >

Re: Anticipating my reign of terror -- new idea for December

Upayavira wrote on Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 06:48:28 +: > Having said that, I personally would like to see some kind of separation > between mentors and the incubator PMC. I think th PMC should be a > smaller, more active group who take a more active interest in the > incubator as it is, and perhap

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Mayhem proposal

Renaming later (a) creates work for infra, (b) forces the community to expend effort communicating the rename to the world. So id'd be better to settle the name sooner rather than later. Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote on Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 20:57:26 +0100: > Hi Christian... > >Isn't that a step

Committership of a podling

When a podling graduates, their unix group needs to created and initialised with the committers of that podling. Is it possible to get that set of availid's programmatically? Basically, do I have options other than "use the authz file group, if such exists". -

Re: Committership of a podling

sebb wrote on Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 11:25:48 +: > On 22 November 2012 10:42, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > When a podling graduates, their unix group needs to created and > > initialised with the committers of that podling. Is it possible to get > > that set of avail

Re: Committership of a podling

sebb wrote on Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 15:10:50 +: > On 22 November 2012 12:15, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > sebb wrote on Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 11:25:48 +: > >> On 22 November 2012 10:42, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > >> > When a podling graduates, their u

Re: Committership of a podling

sebb wrote on Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 00:08:53 +: > On 22 November 2012 22:16, Craig L Russell wrote: > > ... > > > If someone wants to scrape a file, I'd suggest adding a script to > > foundation/board/scripts which would take the date as a parameter and then > > scrape ../board_minutes_date t

Re: Committership of a podling

Craig L Russell wrote on Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 14:16:28 -0800: > If there is a difference between committers and PMC members of a > graduating podling, I don't think there is any process for identifying > which podling committers are to become new-project committers. It is not > in the board re

New graduation jiras

http://www.apache.org/dev/infra-contact#requesting-graduation outlines the jira tickets infra would like to see when a project requests resources migration at TLP graduation. The biggest change is that DNS/website/mailinglists are handled by 1 ticket. Some caveats not documented there are: - The

Re: Formats of SHA/MD5 checksums

Roman Shaposhnik wrote on Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 18:05:15 -0800: > +infra > > Ping! I would really like this annoyance to be resolved one way or the other. > Could somebody more experienced with Apache web properties answer > the question? > > ===

Re: Formats of SHA/MD5 checksums

Henk P. Penning wrote on Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 10:08:33 +0100: > The reason given "I ended up writing a Perl script" doesn't > make sense ; .md5 files come in many forms but the algorithm > to verify is the same for all of them (there are no 'variations.') : > > verify (checksum md5, .md5-

Re: Formats of SHA/MD5 checksums

Jake Farrell wrote on Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 22:02:16 -0500: > That page is part of the Apache CMS and ASF members can edit that page > by using the following http://www.apache.org/dev/cms.html#usage. Non ASF > members can create a ticket within jira under the infra project and > attach a patch

Re: Formats of SHA/MD5 checksums

Daniel Shahaf wrote on Sat, Dec 01, 2012 at 07:25:54 +0200: > Jake Farrell wrote on Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 22:02:16 -0500: > > That page is part of the Apache CMS and ASF members can edit that page > > by using the following http://www.apache.org/dev/cms.html#usage. Non ASF

Re: Invoke silent consensus rule for podling releases

Make every vote a bugzilla issue, and use the existing script that mails an issue summary once a week? Ross Gardler wrote on Sat, Dec 01, 2012 at 14:55:05 +: > That tool would be useful in more places than the incubator. Great idea. > I'm looking forward to seeing it ;-) > > Sent from my tab

Re: Incubator report reminders sent for Dec 2012

On Sat, Dec 01, 2012 at 07:20:35PM +0100, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > I miss Onami and Ripple from the reminders. > Helix and HDT are also missing; these four are all set up as ${podling}.incubator.apache.org - related? > But they are listed here: > http://incubator.apache.org/report-next-month

Re: New tool for setting up the monthly report

Benson Margulies wrote on Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 22:15:37 -0500: > In 1421649, I've added clutch2report.py. Run this, and out pops > report.txt, which can then be pasted into the wiki page. > I wonder how complicated it might be to make it also create the say January2013 wiki page? (and then to cr

Re: Release mirroring

svnpubsub isn't enabled for your dist area. You need to ask infra to set that up Alexander Broekhuis wrote on Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 20:18:37 +0100: > Hi all, > > I've added the first celix release to svn using the method described at > [1]. During the vote the release was under dist/dev, and toda

Re: PPMC versus commiter

Benson Margulies wrote on Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 07:43:19 -0500: > 3. Legally/organizationally, since PPMC members don't have binding > votes, there's not much practical effect of making a distinction. At > the end of the day, only Incubator PMC members have binding votes. The practical differences

Re: PPMC versus commiter

Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote on Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 16:35:51 +: > Making someone a C without PPMC gives them the power to evolve the code, > but not to help make decisions about how can maintain it, or when to > release it. Something about that, I just don't find right. You _don't need to h

Re: PPMC versus commiter

Ross Gardler wrote on Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 22:13:17 +: > Christian, you can review any podling I'm a mentor on, including AOO, to > see discussion of both models. I'm sure many other projects have discussed > this too. > > The page you refer to is correct, there are two separate roles as > rec

Re: PPMC versus commiter

Christian Grobmeier wrote on Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 05:47:56 +0100: > On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 5:44 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote: > > That's just RBD's signature boilerplate for a document he likely started. > > Feel free to remove it if you think it detracts from the document. > > > > I leave the label

Re: [VOTE] retire photark

> > [+1] > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog Talend Community Co

Re: Do all releases need to go to /dist?

Benson Margulies wrote on Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 07:01:03 -0500: > On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 6:58 AM, Marcel Offermans > wrote: > > Well, I don't think it's fine. As long as our release policy states that > > all releases must be archived on /dist we should do exactly that. Or change > > the policy.

Re: [VOTE] Apache Oltu (formerly Apache Amber) graduation resolution

Shane Curcuru wrote on Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 08:36:58 -0500: > The bad news is that there is another software project with "Oltu" in > the name (google "oltu software", since trademarks are only important > within general categories of products). The good news is it seems to > simply be a str

Re: First attempt at January2013 report template

David Crossley wrote on Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 16:40:11 +1100: > Jukka Zitting wrote: > > David Crossley kirjoitti: > > > > > > It all requires podlings to keep the project metadata up-to-date! > > > Clutch can only use the data that it is fed. The poor state of > > > the metadata has many ramificat

Re: Clean up users who are members of the "incubator" group and no other?

Benson Margulies wrote on Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 06:18:19 -0500: > This is a bit mysterious to me, as I thought that there wasn't one of > these. I've been following prior precedent and adding people > individually to the SVN acls for individual projects, not using a > group at all. > 'incubator' g

Re: Citing documentation when critiquing podlings

You mean http://www.producingoss.com/en/growth.html#using-archives ? (the first paragraphs apply just a well to documentation as to mail archives) Benson Margulies wrote on Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 13:54:07 -0500: > I'd like to float the following idea: > > Any time anyone offers a critique of a podl

Re: Incubator voting status page

Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 05:05:42 +0100: > There are currently no links to the actual vote threads. Also I'm having > a bit of trouble with the feed from mod_mbox, as it's quite short-term > and doesn't seem to be at all complete; that's why I switched to using > the current month

Re: Incubator voting status page

Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 13:40:29 +0100: > On 24.01.2013 13:25, Gary Martin wrote: > > Interestingly, the form that Ryan announced the results means that it > > looks like the Bloodhound vote is still open. I'll guess that markmail > > doesn't take cc's as being on the list or som

Re: Incubator voting status page

Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 22:01:32 +0100: > On 24.01.2013 17:19, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 13:40:29 +0100: > >> On 24.01.2013 13:25, Gary Martin wrote: > >>> Interestingly, the form that Ryan announced the res

Re: Incubator voting status page

Branko Čibej wrote on Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 15:27:25 +0100: > I changed the vote counting script so that it parses /all/ the incubator > list archives, not just general@, for vote threads addressed to Do you also parse the d...@helix.incubator.apache.org archives, which are in ~apmail/public-arch/h

Re: Incubator voting status page

Branko Čibej wrote on Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 18:40:18 +0100: > On 25.01.2013 18:26, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > Branko Čibej wrote on Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 15:27:25 +0100: > >> I changed the vote counting script so that it parses /all/ the incubator > >> list archives,

Re: Incubator voting status page

Branko Čibej wrote on Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 15:30:04 +0100: > On 26.01.2013 14:27, Benson Margulies wrote: > > Brane, are you currently using the pickled clutch metadata? If we just > > need to add a field to it we can. > > Nope, I'm currently walking the incubator archive tree. The clutch > metada

Re: Incubator voting status page

Branko Čibej wrote on Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 08:22:42 +0100: > On 27.01.2013 16:17, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > Branko Čibej wrote on Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 15:30:04 +0100: > >> On 26.01.2013 14:27, Benson Margulies wrote: > >>> Brane, are you currently using the pickl

Re: Incubator voting status page

David Crossley wrote on Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 16:12:34 +1100: > You are striking the same type of problems that Clutch has > needed to deal with over the years. In general, the state of > podling metadata is not reliable. That is something that we > need to get podling developers interested with. >

Re: Incubator voting status page

Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 16:40:14 +0100: > I guess it's best if I ping infra and ask about getting this done (or > probably file an INFRA ticket). Infra are also in the best position to > know if we can have the page regenerated more often, e.g., once an hour. The first issue I s

Re: Fwd: [Incubator Wiki] Update of "February2013" by RetoBachmannGmuer

Benson Margulies wrote on Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 20:21:00 +: > Can someone please explain this diffs to me? Probably stripped trailing whitespace. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additiona

Re: Incubator voting status page

Branko Čibej wrote on Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 17:29:45 +0100: > I think updating the httpd config is the more realistic option, since it > doesn't presume a ssh tunnel between minotaur and the site server. The only supported way to get content to the web servers is to commit it to svn and have svnpub

Re: Incubator voting status page

Branko Čibej wrote on Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 11:01:42 +0100: > On 01.02.2013 18:05, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > Branko Čibej wrote on Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 17:29:45 +0100: > >> I think updating the httpd config is the more realistic option, since it > >> doesn't presume a

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >