Jochen Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It is quite reasonable, that this will change over the next year. But, > as the situation is now, I would consider it a pain to use SVN in > everydays work. That is also the reason, where I do not support > switching to SVN in the Apache projects, I am involved in.
Oh, SpamAssassin is not in the incubator any more, but boy, SVN is MUCH MUCH better than CVS. I highly recommend it. When Subversion 1.1 comes out, as far as I can tell, it will be superior to CVS in every way. 1.1 fixes my two major complaints: "svn blame" was really slow and diff now follows across renames (before, you had to specify both full names which is a pain). Even without 1.1, it's crazy to not be being moving any project to SVN as fast as possible. Of course, if SVN does not do something you must have, then wait, but otherwise just do it. It's that nice. Daniel -- Daniel Quinlan http://www.pathname.com/~quinlan/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
