On Jan 10, 2008 6:15 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 9, 2008 8:24 PM, Alan D. Cabrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > As you all know Yoko is being assimilated into CXF and Geronimo. Both
> > PMCs understand that they are responsibl
On Jan 9, 2008 8:24 PM, Alan D. Cabrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As you all know Yoko is being assimilated into CXF and Geronimo. Both
> PMCs understand that they are responsible for the provenance of the
> contributions that are being brought in. My question is about what
That is the problem ... these guys (gals) are so good there is no bad
code. Thus, no JIRAs
Perhaps the Fabric 3 project needs more coders :)
Good to hear from you Jeremy !
On Jan 9, 2008, at 4:01 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
Migrate any remaining JIRAs?
--
Jeremy
On Jan 9, 2008, at 1:01 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
On Jan 9, 2008, at 8:24 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
As you all know Yoko is being assimilated into CXF and Geronimo.
Both PMCs understand that they are responsible for the provenance
of the contributions that are being brought in. My
On Jan 9, 2008, at 8:24 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
As you all know Yoko is being assimilated into CXF and Geronimo.
Both PMCs understand that they are responsible for the provenance
of the contributions that are being brought in. My question is
about what remains to be done on the
As you all know Yoko is being assimilated into CXF and Geronimo. Both
PMCs understand that they are responsible for the provenance of the
contributions that are being brought in. My question is about what
remains to be done on the *incubator* side. Here's what's on my to
Ant pinged me and gently reminded me there had been no response to his
comment. My apologies for closing the vote before clearing this up.
On Dec 13, 2007, at 3:42 AM, ant elder wrote:
The proposal mentions continuing to allow for independent releases
of the
Yoko code that gets moved
t was discussed and brought forward by the
Yoko Community. In a nutshell the proposal is to create a Yoko sub-
project of Apache Geronimo for the Core ORB and to move the bindings
to CXF. Please read the proposal below for all the detail.
This proposal was brought forward to the Apache Ger
My +1 ... sorry
On Dec 17, 2007, at 8:36 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Dec 12, 2007, at 5:28 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Tuesday 11 December 2007 11:26, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
[x] +1 Approve the below proposal and code migration to
Apache Geronimo and CXF respectively
+1
On Dec 12, 2007, at 5:28 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Tuesday 11 December 2007 11:26, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
[x] +1 Approve the below proposal and code migration to
Apache Geronimo and CXF respectively
+1
-
To unsubsc
+1
On 11/12/2007, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Below is a proposal that was discussed and brought forward by the Yoko
> Community. In a nutshell the proposal is to create a Yoko sub-project
> of Apache Geronimo for the Core ORB and to move the bindings to CXF.
&g
On Dec 11, 2007 2:15 PM, Alexey Petrenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> 2007/12/11, Carl Trieloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > Just to make sure I understand what is happening here - Yoko is going
> > away/ending and getting
> > merged into Geronimo and CXF?
+1
Bill
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Below is a proposal that was discussed and brought forward by the Yoko
Community. In a nutshell the proposal is to create a Yoko sub-project
of Apache Geronimo for the Core ORB and to move the bindings to CXF.
Please read the proposal below for all the detail
On Dec 12, 2007, at 3:34 AM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Dec 11, 2007 4:14 PM, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yoko has done a release before so I would assume that the due-
dilligence
has been completed.
The Yoko status file has nothing recorded to that effect and it
doesn&
On Dec 11, 2007 4:14 PM, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yoko has done a release before so I would assume that the due-dilligence
> has been completed.
The Yoko status file has nothing recorded to that effect and it
doesn't seem right to me to go on assumptions.
h
to an existing project.
The way I see it theres two scenarios here:
1) CXF is incubating (i.e. no current PMC) and none of the Yoko
developers are interested in moving with the portion of code thats
going there. IMO its only going to get harder to complete this as time
goes by so better off gett
On Tuesday 11 December 2007 11:26, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
[x] +1 Approve the below proposal and code migration to
Apache Geronimo and CXF respectively
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc
I relax here;
+1
--kevan
On Dec 10, 2007, at 10:26 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Below is a proposal that was discussed and brought forward by the
Yoko Community. In a nutshell the proposal is to create a Yoko sub-
project of Apache Geronimo for the Core ORB and to move the bindings
to CXF. Please read
+1
Craig
On Dec 10, 2007, at 7:26 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
[ ] +1 Approve the below proposal and code migration to Apache
Geronimo and CXF respectively
[ ] 0 No opinion
[ ] -1 Do not approve of the move (please provide rationale
Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://j
Yoko has done a release before so I would assume that the due-dilligence
has been completed.
Dan
On Tuesday 11 December 2007, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> Links to the various relevant threads for anyone interested:
>
> Yoko Threads:
> http://tinyurl.com/2y4sy9
>
ds for anyone interested:
>
> Yoko Threads:
> http://tinyurl.com/2y4sy9
> http://tinyurl.com/2ffkn2
> http://tinyurl.com/2glch9
> http://tinyurl.com/2d94hw
> Geronimo Discussion: http://tinyurl.com/2zr2bh
> Geronimo Vote: http://tinyurl.com
Links to the various relevant threads for anyone interested:
Yoko Threads:
http://tinyurl.com/2y4sy9
http://tinyurl.com/2ffkn2
http://tinyurl.com/2glch9
http://tinyurl.com/2d94hw
Geronimo Discussion: http://tinyurl.com/2zr2bh
Geronimo Vote: http://tinyurl.com
2007/12/11, Carl Trieloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Just to make sure I understand what is happening here - Yoko is going
> away/ending and getting
> merged into Geronimo and CXF?
Yes.
SY, Alexey
> Alexey Petrenko wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > 2007/12/11, Matt Hogst
Just to make sure I understand what is happening here - Yoko is going
away/ending and getting
merged into Geronimo and CXF?
Carl.
Alexey Petrenko wrote:
+1
2007/12/11, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Below is a proposal that was discussed and brought forward by the Yoko
Com
+1
2007/12/11, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Below is a proposal that was discussed and brought forward by the Yoko
> Community. In a nutshell the proposal is to create a Yoko sub-project
> of Apache Geronimo for the Core ORB and to move the bindings to CXF.
> Please
Below is a proposal that was discussed and brought forward by the Yoko
Community. In a nutshell the proposal is to create a Yoko sub-project
of Apache Geronimo for the Core ORB and to move the bindings to CXF.
Please read the proposal below for all the detail.
This proposal was brought
Matt,
Your addition to the Incubator PMC was ACK'd by the Board today. You become
official on Friday.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Noel,
I sent a note to the Incubator PMC yesterday. (Assuming its
[EMAIL PROTECTED]). not sure if its stuck in moderation
or not.
On Aug 20, 2007, at 10:20 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Ken Coar has stepped down as one of Yoko's mentors and
Matt Hogstrom has graci
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> Ken Coar has stepped down as one of Yoko's mentors and
> Matt Hogstrom has graciously offered to step in.
Ken should be letting the Incubator PMC know that he's stepping down, or at
least confirming.
> Thanks for all your help in the past Ken and welcome aboard Matt!
Fi
I'm not sure if there needs to be an announcement or not but Ken Coar
has stepped down as one of Yoko's mentors and Matt Hogstrom has
graciously offered to step in.
Thanks for all your help in the past Ken and welcome aboard Matt!
Regards,
Alan
-
Hello Noel,
I meant to send you this email yesterday...as you requested in your email
last month, I've posted the Yoko report to the June2007 reports page.
Cheers,
Darren
On 5/15/07, Darren Middleman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
OK...I'll get it done for next month.
Darren
Thanks Darren!
Regards,
Alan
On Jun 12, 2007, at 11:38 AM, Darren Middleman wrote:
Hello Noel,
I meant to send you this email yesterday...as you requested in your
email
last month, I've posted the Yoko report to the June2007 reports page.
Cheers,
Darren
On 5/15/07, Darren Midd
OK...I'll get it done for next month.
Darren
On 5/14/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Darren Middleman wrote:
> Sorry about the incubator report, I didn't realize it was that time
already.
> I'll get this together and post it to the Wiki tomorrow (Tuesday).
That will be too lat
Hi Noel,
Sorry about the incubator report, I didn't realize it was that time
already. I'll get this together and post it to the Wiki tomorrow (Tuesday).
Cheers,
Darren
On 5/14/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Where is the Incubator Board Report
Darren Middleman wrote:
> Sorry about the incubator report, I didn't realize it was that time
already.
> I'll get this together and post it to the Wiki tomorrow (Tuesday).
That will be too late. Please submit it for next month. Don't plan on any
releases until after the report has been filed.
Where is the Incubator Board Report for Yoko?
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/May2007
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 3/9/07, Rick McGuire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The Yoko community voted on and has approved a proposal to release Yoko
Milestone 2.
Please vote by 6 PM EST Tuesday, 03/13.
+1
comments and notes
-
(subjective recommendations, not binding)
t
+1 from me.
-- dims
On 3/9/07, Rick McGuire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The Yoko community voted on and has approved a proposal to release Yoko
Milestone 2. Pursuant to the Releases section of the Incubation
Policy we would now like to request the permission of the Incubator PMC
to publi
Rick McGuire wrote:
The Yoko community voted on and has approved a proposal to release Yoko
Milestone 2. Pursuant to the Releases section of the Incubation
Policy we would now like to request the permission of the Incubator PMC
to publish the milestone on the Yoko Download page.
How come the
Rick McGuire wrote:
The Yoko community voted on and has approved a proposal to release Yoko
Milestone 2. Pursuant to the Releases section of the Incubation
Policy we would now like to request the permission of the Incubator PMC
to publish the milestone on the Yoko Download page.
+1
Bill
The Yoko community voted on and has approved a proposal to release Yoko
Milestone 2. Pursuant to the Releases section of the Incubation
Policy we would now like to request the permission of the Incubator PMC
to publish the milestone on the Yoko Download page.
The tally of votes was 8 +1, no 0
sed the tag
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/yoko/tags/yoko-1.0-incubating
> -M1-release for the release.
>
>
>
> For the idl grammar license issue, got a confirmation from the apache
> legal team that it is fine not to include any header in that file but
> mention
This vote has passed with +1s from: Robert Burrell Donkin, Jukka Zitting
& Geir Magnusson Jr. There were no -1s.
Thank you all that took the time to help getting the Yoko M1 release
done.
- Balaji
Apache Yoko
-Original Message-
From: Mosur Ravi, Balaji
Sent: Thursday, October 26,
+1
Mosur Ravi, Balaji wrote:
Hi,
I have fixed all the issues that were raised during the earlier vote and
I have uploaded the new release at: http://people.apache.org/~bravi
Also, I used the tag
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/yoko/tags/yoko-1.0-incubating
-M1-release for
Hi,
Here are the two votes so far - can another mentor please help us
get this milestone released.
Thanks, Edell.
-Original Message-
From: Jukka Zitting [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 22 November 2006 23:49
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Publish Yoko M1
Hi,
Where are the three mentors' votes? I see one reference from Ken
(http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=incubator-general&m=116343081819123&w=2)
but not much else, and it's been a couple of weeks since the above
post...
Yoav
On 11/28/06, Johnson, Eric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
The YOKO guys have been languishing for weeks waiting for one more
vote..
> -Original Message-
> From: robert burrell donkin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 5:02 PM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Publish Yoko M1
On 11/28/06, Nolan, Edell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Can someone tell us how we can proceed to get our milesone 1 released.
We currently have two +1 votes.
i'm sad to say that we need one other IPMCer to take a look at the release
hopefully someone else will find a few cycles sometime soo
Hi,
Can someone tell us how we can proceed to get our milesone 1 released.
We currently have two +1 votes.
Thanks, Edell.
-Original Message-
From: Jukka Zitting [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 22 November 2006 23:49
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Publish Yoko M1
Great! Thanks and we will definitely consider all
your suggestions for the next release.
Edell.
-Original Message-
From: Jukka Zitting [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 22 November 2006 23:49
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Publish Yoko M1 release
Hi,
On 11/21/06
Hi,
On 11/21/06, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I wouldn't call either a blocker, notably since the release packages
were created and the vote started well before November 1st, but I'll
need to give the packages a more thorough review before voting.
+1 for the release, looks good
PS
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
robert burrell donkin wrote:
>
> hopefully some of the mentors will jump in sometime soon (it might be
> worth someone giving them a gentle prod)
Someone gave me a gentle prod, but I have been remiss in
my duties as mentor and would have to catch up
Hi,
We are still waiting to get our milestone one released -
can someone please take a look for us.
Thanks, Edell.
-Original Message-
From: Mosur Ravi, Balaji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 31 October 2006 15:28
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Publish Yoko M1
On 10/31/06, Mosur Ravi, Balaji <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Reminder: Please take a look at the proposed release and vote on it.
So far, we have a +1 from Robert.
it's a good release :-)
hopefully some of the mentors will jump in sometime soon (it might be
worth someone giving them a gentle pr
+1 (non-binding)
Mosur Ravi, Balaji wrote:
Hi,
I have fixed all the issues that were raised during the earlier vote and
I have uploaded the new release at: http://people.apache.org/~bravi
Also, I used the tag
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/yoko/tags/yoko-1.0-incubating
-M1
Reminder: Please take a look at the proposed release and vote on it.
So far, we have a +1 from Robert.
Thanks
Balaji
-Original Message-
From: Mosur Ravi, Balaji
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 12:39 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Publish Yoko M1 release
Hi
On 10/26/06, Mosur Ravi, Balaji <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The Yoko community voted on and has approved a proposal to release Yoko
Milestone 1. Pursuant to the Releases section of the Incubation
Policy we would now like to request the permission of the Incubator PMC
to publish the mil
Hi,
I have fixed all the issues that were raised during the earlier vote and
I have uploaded the new release at: http://people.apache.org/~bravi
Also, I used the tag
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/yoko/tags/yoko-1.0-incubating
-M1-release for the release.
For the idl
On 10/19/06, Mosur Ravi, Balaji <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi robert,
Just noticed that we have the package headers in the idl.g which should
be apache licensed & the rest of the grammar is under antlr license...
What's the general rule that is followed in this case?
this is the right sort of
On 10/19/06, Mosur Ravi, Balaji <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks for the review...
About the idl.g, I don't think we need a license header as it is through
the antlr's license (which we have in the source distribution). Should I
include antlr's license in the idl.g? We have it in the
trunk/etc/
, October 19, 2006 8:35 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Publish Yoko M1 release
Thanks for the review...
About the idl.g, I don't think we need a license header as it is through
the antlr's license (which we have in the source distribution). Should I
include ant
, October 19, 2006 8:35 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Publish Yoko M1 release
Thanks for the review...
About the idl.g, I don't think we need a license header as it is through
the antlr's license (which we have in the source distribution). Should I
include ant
I will look at the license files in the binary distribution & put the
DISCLIAMER.txt in the root directory.
- Balaji
-Original Message-
From: robert burrell donkin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 5:26 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VO
On 10/17/06, Mosur Ravi, Balaji <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The Yoko community voted on and has approved a proposal to release Yoko
Milestone 1.
Pursuant to the Releases section of the Incubation Policy we would now
like to request the permission of the Incubator PMC to publish the
milest
The Yoko community voted on and has approved a proposal to release Yoko
Milestone 1.
Pursuant to the Releases section of the Incubation Policy we would now
like to request the permission of the Incubator PMC to publish the
milestone on the Yoko Download page.
Thanks
Balaji
Proposal:
http
On 10/10/06, Mosur Ravi, Balaji <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks... I have now fixed all the files in our distribution. Can we
start the Vote again for releasing yoko milestone 1 release?
sorry i missed this :-/
any chance of starting a new VOTE thread...?
(makes it more visible)
-
Thanks... I have now fixed all the files in our distribution. Can we
start the Vote again for releasing yoko milestone 1 release?
Yoko release: http://people.apache.org/~bravi
- Balaji
-Original Message-
From: robert burrell donkin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 09
On 10/9/06, Mosur Ravi, Balaji <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi robert,
I have a question regarding the Apache license header in some files in
our distribution. I have emailed the legal-discuss mailing list but
thought I would ask the general list also to see if I can get an
answer...
legal discu
nses\celtix-epl-license.txt
third_party_licenses\wsdl4j-cpl-license.txt
Thanks
Balaji
-Original Message-
From: robert burrell donkin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2006 5:02 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Publish Yoko M1 release
On 9/2
Comments in-line.
I will log these issues in jira and we will get them fixed.
Thanks, Edell.
-Original Message-
From: robert burrell donkin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05 October 2006 22:02
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Publish Yoko M1 release
On 9/29/06
On 9/29/06, Mosur Ravi, Balaji <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The Yoko community voted on and has approved a proposal to release Yoko
Milestone 1. Pursuant to the Releases section of the Incubation
Policy we would now like to request the permission of the Incubator PMC
to publish the milest
The Yoko community voted on and has approved a proposal to release Yoko
Milestone 1. Pursuant to the Releases section of the Incubation
Policy we would now like to request the permission of the Incubator PMC
to publish the milestone on the Yoko Download page.
Please vote by 6 PM EST Thursday, 10
The Yoko community voted on and has approved a proposal to release Yoko
Milestone 1. Pursuant to the Releases section of the Incubation
Policy we would now like to request the permission of the Incubator PMC
to publish the milestone on the Yoko Download page.
Please vote by 6 PM EST Friday, 10
> >> committers, but that's just me. :-)
> >>
> >
> > Works for me.
>
>
> Ken,
>
> It seems that this is the way to go and has been "seconded" by lazy
> consensus. I will file a Jira to create the
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing l
Works for me.
Ken,
It seems that this is the way to go and has been "seconded" by lazy
consensus. I will file a Jira to create the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list.
This will be the last Yoko posting that crosses over to Geronimo and
Incubator G
On 2/23/2006 11:32 AM, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
One question, do we need a PPMC? I think that we should start one
since this project has a very real possibility of becoming a TLP.
It's not really a matter of c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>
> One question, do we need a PPMC? I think that we should start one
> since this project has a very real possibility of becoming a TLP.
It's not really a matter of choice. Incubating podlings
have PPMCs regardles of where t
Send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to join the
discussions!
-dain
On Feb 23, 2006, at 10:03 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
I think that Yoko is good to go.
ASF Infra has set up the mailing lists, SVN, and created accounts
for our new committers as well as adding the existing interested
ASF
I think that Yoko is good to go.
ASF Infra has set up the mailing lists, SVN, and created accounts for
our new committers as well as adding the existing interested ASF
committers to the proper Unix group. I will notify the new committers
of their new accounts. There are some stragglers and
These are set up now.
- Brett
On 2/22/06, Trustin Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/22/06, Garrett Rooney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On 2/21/06, Trustin Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I sent subscription messages to yoko-commits-subscri
On 2/22/06, Garrett Rooney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 2/21/06, Trustin Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I sent subscription messages to yoko-commits-subscribe,
> yoko-dev-subscribe,
> > and yoko-user-subscribe, but the server returned them saying that
>
On 2/21/06, Trustin Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I sent subscription messages to yoko-commits-subscribe, yoko-dev-subscribe,
> and yoko-user-subscribe, but the server returned them saying that there's no
> such mail boxes. Is it really set up?
Uhh, did you see th
I sent subscription messages to yoko-commits-subscribe, yoko-dev-subscribe,
and yoko-user-subscribe, but the server returned them saying that there's no
such mail boxes. Is it really set up?
Trustin
On 2/22/06, Rodent of Unusual Size <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> -BEGIN P
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Infrastructure..
As one of the mentors of the Yoko podling, I request
the creation of the following mailing lists for the podling:
Name: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives: public, Eyebrowse
Moderators: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Feb 8, 2006, at 6:23 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
At graduation, the community will decide its final resting place?
Interesting choice of words =)
-Brian
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
On 2/8/2006 5:50 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Alan,
Please note that this is not a Geronimo sub-project. Incubator projects are
just that: Incubator projects whose final destination will be determined at
graduation.
Amongst other issues, we want to be inviting and inclusive of whomever wants
On 2/8/2006 5:16 PM, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
The only person who's stepped up and volunteered is Geir. Is there
anyone else? Are two mentors enough?
I'm there also.
Yep. Thanks Ken!
Regards,
Alan
Alan,
Please note that this is not a Geronimo sub-project. Incubator projects are
just that: Incubator projects whose final destination will be determined at
graduation.
Amongst other issues, we want to be inviting and inclusive of whomever wants to
participate, including other ASF projects.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>
> The only person who's stepped up and volunteered is Geir. Is there
> anyone else? Are two mentors enough?
I'm there also.
- --
#kenP-)}
Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Ken.Coar.Org/
Author, developer, opin
On 1/31/2006 8:23 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote, On 1/31/2006 7:27 PM:
Alan,
Could you folks turn up some additional Mentors? We have not adopted
a formal policy to require more than one --- yet --- but I'd like to
see more than one.
Sure, good idea.
The only perso
Noel J. Bergman wrote, On 1/31/2006 7:27 PM:
Alan,
Could you folks turn up some additional Mentors? We have not adopted a formal
policy to require more than one --- yet --- but I'd like to see more than one.
Sure, good idea.
Regards,
Alan
--
Alan,
Could you folks turn up some additional Mentors? We have not adopted a formal
policy to require more than one --- yet --- but I'd like to see more than one.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
F
Results of the vote [1] on Yoko - A CORBA Server sub-project proposal [2]:
+1 David Blevins
+1 Jacek Laskowski
+1 John Sisson
+1 Alan Cabrera
+1 Jeff Genender
+1 Davanum Srinivas
+1 Matt Hogstrom
+1 David Jencks
+1 Dain Sundstrom
+1 Bruce Snyder
+1 Greg Wilkins
+1 Jan Bartel
+1
93 matches
Mail list logo
