On Dec 11, 2007 4:14 PM, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yoko has done a release before so I would assume that the due-dilligence
> has been completed.

The Yoko status file has nothing recorded to that effect and it
doesn't seem right to me to go on assumptions.

http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/yoko/trunk/STATUS

Niall

> Dan
>
>
>
> On Tuesday 11 December 2007, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> > Links to the various relevant threads for anyone interested:
> >
> > Yoko Threads:
> >          http://tinyurl.com/2y4sy9
> >          http://tinyurl.com/2ffkn2
> >          http://tinyurl.com/2glch9
> >          http://tinyurl.com/2d94hw
> > Geronimo Discussion: http://tinyurl.com/2zr2bh
> > Geronimo Vote: http://tinyurl.com/2c8yuo
> > CXF Discussion / Vote: http://tinyurl.com/yr6wet
> >
> > I guess the question is has the appropriate incubator due-dilligence
> > been completed on the Yoko code? If not then wouldn't that need doing
> > before the code could move?
> >
> > Niall
> >
> > On Dec 11, 2007 3:26 AM, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Below is a proposal that was discussed and brought forward by the
> > > Yoko Community.  In a nutshell the proposal is to create a Yoko
> > > sub-project of Apache Geronimo for the Core ORB and to move the
> > > bindings to CXF. Please read the proposal below for all the detail.
> > >
> > > This proposal was brought forward to the Apache Geronimo and Apache
> > > CXF communities.  Both communities have voted to accept this
> > > proposal.
> > >
> > > Vote results from Apache Geronimo were 20 +1 votes and no 0 or -1
> > > votes.  17 were binding from the Geronimo PMC.
> > > CXF Results on the CF Dev list were 13 +1 votes and 1 0 vote
> > >
> > > I am now bringing this to the Incubator for final approval so that
> > > the code can be moved from Incubator to the respective receiving
> > > projects.  This proposal was previously sent to the IPMC for comment
> > > while the respective communities discussed and voted.  During that
> > > time there has been no comments that indicated there was an issue so
> > > I bring this vote back to the Incubator for finalization:
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 Approve the below proposal and code migration to Apache
> > > Geronimo and CXF respectively
> > > [ ]  0 No opinion
> > > [ ] -1 Do not approve of the move (please provide rationale
> > >
> > > If someone wants to comment on this thread please use the Alternate
> > > [DISCUSS] thread and not the vote thread.
> > >
> > > This vote will conclude on Dec 14th at 0900 ET.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Original Proposal
> > >
> > > The members of project yoko have been considering the future of Yoko
> > > as a project.  There have been several milestones delivered and the
> > > project is used by other ASF projects.   The project is not as
> > > active as other ASF projects and it makes sense to move the code
> > > from Yoko to other projects.  The Yoko team has the following
> > > proposal for your consideration.
> > >
> > > Proposed Code Donation from Project Yoko to Apache CXF and Apache
> > > Geronimo
> > >
> > > The Yoko community has been successful in delivering several
> > > milestones of the ORB implementation while in the Apache Incubator.
> > > These milestones are used by other Apache projects (namely Geronimo
> > > and Harmony) to support their releases.  The WebServices bindings
> > > are dependent on CXF.  The Yoko community has decided that the Yoko
> > > project does not have quite the momentum to carry itself as an
> > > independent project but has sufficient value for other projects for
> > > them to consider receiving the code and committers for that
> > > code-base as sub-projects.  Since the code under consideration is
> > > used by Apache Geronimo, Apache CXF and Apache Harmony the movement
> > > of the code should continue to allow for independent releases so the
> > > code can be easily shared with other dependent projects.
> > >
> > > The proposed division is:
> > >
> > > yoko-spec-corba - this is the org.omg interface classes.
> > > rmi-spec - this is the javax.rmi spec implementation
> > > core - This is the actual ORB implementation.
> > > rmi-impl - This is the implementation of the RMIIIOP support.
> > >
> > > These modules are also used by Harmony.
> > >
> > > In addition to the code we propose that the following committers in
> > > Apache Yoko be accepted as committers in Apache Geronimo given their
> > > demonstration of delivering code, creating releases and functioning
> > > as a community.  Those noted with asterisks are already Geronimo
> > > committers.
> > >
> > > Continued involvement with the core:
> > >
> > > Rick McGuire *
> > > David Jencks *
> > > Alan Cabrera  *
> > > Lars Kuhne
> > > Alexey Petrenko
> > > Darren Middleman
> > >
> > > The remainder of the modules in Yoko are part of the webservices
> > > support and are independent of the underlying ORB implementation.
> > >
> > > api -- interface classes used for the web services support.
> > > bindings -- code to implement the CORBA-Web services bindings.
> > > tools -- tools for generation WSDL and IDL for the bindings
> > > maven-plugin -- some maven plugins that can use the tools for
> > > generating binding-related build artifacts.  None of the
> > > maven-plugin code is used by the ORB.
> > >
> > > There is also a distribution directory with some sample
> > > applications. One set of samples demonstrates using the core ORB,
> > > the other set is for WebServices.  We recommend that the
> > > distribution directory should move to Apache CXF as the webservices
> > > examples use the orb samples to bind them as web services.  Since
> > > Apache Geronimo's only use of CORBA is for exporting EJBs, these
> > > samples are not particularly valuable for Geronimo.
> > >
> > > The Yoko community did not have any committers that expressed an
> > > interest in continuing work on these bindings.  As such, only the
> > > code would be moving to apache CXF.
> > >
> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> --
> J. Daniel Kulp
> Principal Engineer
> IONA
> P: 781-902-8727    C: 508-380-7194
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.dankulp.com/blog
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to