Craig wrote:
>Off the top of my head ... advantages include:
IMO you missed out "Your own PMC and charter" These two things represent a
quantum difference in the management of a TLP c.f a jakarta sub-project, as
the bring with them the ability (within the restrictions of "The Apache
Way"
Craig,
All good points. Another is that some projects have a natural synergy, and
fit well together.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 24/09/2003 08:39:08
AM:
[snip]
> As a committer on a (hopefully :-) mature Jakarta subproject (Struts), I
As a committer on top level and not top level projects:
> think there's another dimension here. Can we articulate the advantages
> of b
On Tuesday, September 23, 2003, at 10:16 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Robert,
I renamed the thread, which has nothing to do with the Directory project,
and really no longer belongs here, but here it is. Perhaps community@
would
be better?
i'm a bit fed up with this the whole thread. i now seem to
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Robert,
I renamed the thread, which has nothing to do with the Directory project,
and really no longer belongs here, but here it is. Perhaps community@ would
be better?
if you had said "i'll volunteer to help every jakarta sub-project
to realize that they want their own
Robert,
I renamed the thread, which has nothing to do with the Directory project,
and really no longer belongs here, but here it is. Perhaps community@ would
be better?
> if you had said "i'll volunteer to help every jakarta sub-project
> to realize that they want their own top level project" th
