Patrick,
Does the source code live in the xmlbeans cvs tree?
thanks,
dims
On Fri, 21 May 2004 11:53:41 -0700, Patrick Calahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> At 10:59 AM 5/21/2004 -0500, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
> >Patrick,
> >
> >I have heard a lot of good things about JAM, but have not look
At 10:59 AM 5/21/2004 -0500, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Patrick,
I have heard a lot of good things about JAM, but have not looked at it
yet. In Geronimo we would like to offer support for annotations in the
GBean service layer, but that would mean using a 1.5 VM. I don't see us
raising the minimum
Patrick,
I have heard a lot of good things about JAM, but have not looked at it
yet. In Geronimo we would like to offer support for annotations in the
GBean service layer, but that would mean using a 1.5 VM. I don't see
us raising the minimum required VM to 1.5 until J2EE 1.5 comes out
(2007-
At 12:38 AM 3/27/2004 +0100, Leo Simons wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote: [comments on stuff about JAM by Patrick Calahan]
Hi Leo. Thanks for taking time to respond.
it would be so cool if you (Patrick) and Leo Sutic (the guy who wrote the
current commons-sandbox-attributes) could get together and
Leo Simons wrote:
> As to process, if jakarta-commons wants the code, you have a CLA on
> file, and the code was developed completely within an ASF repo
> @ xmlbeans, I don't think we need to have this go through incubation.
One small detail: XMLBeans, itself, is in the Incubator. :-) It has
ne
>>> Have you approached any of the projects, such as Geronimo? If it were
>> Not yet, but that seems like a good idea - will do.
>
> I think adding JAM to Geronimo might create problems since geronimo
> uses xmlbeans rather heavily in its build process. I don't see an
> obvious way to sidestep th
Patrick,
I suggest that you to approach Geronimo and perhaps Avalon. Avalon has
their own metadata, and it is a VERY contentious area within that project.
It seems that both might benefit from being JAMS users.
I also encourage you to approach Jakarta Commons, and take a look at
http://jakarta.a
On Friday, March 26, 2004, at 11:46 AM, Patrick Calahan wrote:
At 01:41 AM 3/26/2004 -0500, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Patrick,
Hi Noel. Thanks for the response.
I'm replying to you on [EMAIL PROTECTED] The projects@
list is
a catchall for projects that don't have their own list, but the place
wh
At 01:41 AM 3/26/2004 -0500, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Patrick,
Hi Noel. Thanks for the response.
I'm replying to you on [EMAIL PROTECTED] The projects@ list is
a catchall for projects that don't have their own list, but the place where
you want to discuss a proposal is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ok, thanks
Patrick,
I'm replying to you on [EMAIL PROTECTED] The projects@ list is
a catchall for projects that don't have their own list, but the place where
you want to discuss a proposal is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There are other meta-data projects within the ASF, and meta-data is
certainly becoming a key iss
10 matches
Mail list logo
