Re: STDCXX voting summary

2005-05-21 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
--On Friday, May 20, 2005 9:58 AM -0700 Cliff Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I also didn't vote, but would vote +1. Maybe I'm too much of a stickler for process, but I was waiting for a [VOTE] email to follow-up on the "Proposal" thread. Although I realize it's not uncommon for a proposal

Re: STDCXX voting summary

2005-05-20 Thread David Crossley
Cliff Schmidt wrote: > I also didn't vote, but would vote +1. Maybe I'm too much of a > stickler for process, but I was waiting for a [VOTE] email to > follow-up on the "Proposal" thread. Although I realize it's not > uncommon for a proposal thread to end up looking a lot like a bunch of > votes.

Re: STDCXX voting summary

2005-05-20 Thread Cliff Schmidt
I also didn't vote, but would vote +1. Maybe I'm too much of a stickler for process, but I was waiting for a [VOTE] email to follow-up on the "Proposal" thread. Although I realize it's not uncommon for a proposal thread to end up looking a lot like a bunch of votes. Cliff On 5/19/05, Heidi Buel

RE: STDCXX voting summary

2005-05-20 Thread Lilantha Darshana
riday, May 20, 2005 10:12 AM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: STDCXX voting summary I didn't vote either but +1 from me too. Axis/C++ stuff had lots of portability problems with STL a while back and having our portable impl would've made a big diff. Sanjiva. On Fri, 2005

RE: STDCXX voting summary

2005-05-20 Thread Heidi Buelow
> -Original Message- > From: Leo Simons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, May 20, 2005 1:07 AM > For the record, I didn't vote. A vote is "+1" or "-1" or "+0" or "-0". My > vote would be +0. Oops, sorry Leo. Not sure now what I saw that made me put you on the list for STDCXX.

Re: STDCXX voting summary

2005-05-20 Thread Sanjiva Weerawarana
I didn't vote either but +1 from me too. Axis/C++ stuff had lots of portability problems with STL a while back and having our portable impl would've made a big diff. Sanjiva. On Fri, 2005-05-20 at 09:36 +0100, Ben Laurie wrote: > Leo Simons wrote: > > On 20-05-2005 01:50, "Heidi Buelow" <[EMAIL P

Re: STDCXX voting summary

2005-05-20 Thread Ben Laurie
Leo Simons wrote: On 20-05-2005 01:50, "Heidi Buelow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Positive (5): Justin, Leo, Sander (binding), Brian and Brane (non binding) Neutral (1): Jim (binding) Negative () For the record, I didn't vote. A vote is "+1" or "-1" or "+0" or "-0". My vote would be +0. And I vote

Re: STDCXX voting summary

2005-05-20 Thread Leo Simons
On 20-05-2005 01:50, "Heidi Buelow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Positive (5): Justin, Leo, Sander (binding), Brian and Brane (non binding) > Neutral (1): Jim (binding) > Negative () For the record, I didn't vote. A vote is "+1" or "-1" or "+0" or "-0". My vote would be +0. Cheers! - Leo ---