I don't know whether my vote counts here. However, +1 from me as well, since I believe, Axis C++ would gain lot of benefits from having this as an open source impl. with apache license.
thanks -Lilantha -----Original Message----- From: Sanjiva Weerawarana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 20, 2005 10:12 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: STDCXX voting summary I didn't vote either but +1 from me too. Axis/C++ stuff had lots of portability problems with STL a while back and having our portable impl would've made a big diff. Sanjiva. On Fri, 2005-05-20 at 09:36 +0100, Ben Laurie wrote: > Leo Simons wrote: > > On 20-05-2005 01:50, "Heidi Buelow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >>Positive (5): Justin, Leo, Sander (binding), Brian and Brane (non binding) > >>Neutral (1): Jim (binding) > >>Negative () > > > > > > For the record, I didn't vote. A vote is "+1" or "-1" or "+0" or "-0". My > > vote would be +0. > > And I vote +1 (I expected that to be implied by my offer to mentor!) > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________ Siebel IT'S ALL ABOUT THE CUSTOMER Visit www.siebel.com This e-mail message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and contains confidential and/or privileged information belonging to Siebel Systems, Inc. or its customers or partners. Any unauthorized review, use, copying, disclosure or distribution of this message is strictly prohibited. If you are not an intended recipient of this message, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all soft and hard copies of the message and any attachments. Thank you for your cooperation. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
