On Nov 26, 2007 9:38 PM, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Nov 26, 2007 4:36 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Does a meta [EMAIL PROTECTED] make more sense for this
> > sort of traffic? (an aggregation of everyone sub'ed to a project-private
> > list, a
Hi,
On Nov 26, 2007 4:36 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yoav Shapira wrote:
> >
> > Have we ever had a use-case for that list, besides the recent endeavor
> > you (Bertrand) and I have been doing? I don't want to have another
> > list only for use once in three years ;)
>
>
Yoav Shapira wrote:
Have we ever had a use-case for that list, besides the recent endeavor
you (Bertrand) and I have been doing? I don't want to have another
list only for use once in three years ;)
Recent examples include PRC instructions on website contents (sponsorship),
offers and invites
Hey,
On Nov 26, 2007 4:10 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 26, 2007 10:07 PM, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > ...Scrap it altogether. All PPMCs people should be on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Which is a public list...it is sometimes useful to have an alias to
>
On Nov 26, 2007 10:07 PM, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...Scrap it altogether. All PPMCs people should be on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Which is a public list...it is sometimes useful to have an alias to
all (private) PPMC lists.
-Bertrand
--
Hey,
On Nov 26, 2007 3:51 PM, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What do we do about this? Should we add a paragraph to the graduation
> guide "Steps outside the incubator" to the effect of "Notify
> infrastructure@ to remove the graduated podling from ppmcs@"?
Scrap it altogether. All
