Hi, On Nov 26, 2007 4:36 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yoav Shapira wrote: > > > > Have we ever had a use-case for that list, besides the recent endeavor > > you (Bertrand) and I have been doing? I don't want to have another > > list only for use once in three years ;) > > Recent examples include PRC instructions on website contents (sponsorship), > offers and invites that aren't targeted to the general public but are of > broad interest to many PMCs, and going a ways back, the actual migration > of pmc/ppmc -> private. > > Rare, yes. Unheard of? No.
OK. Thank you for illustrating the use-cases, that's exactly the sort of info I was looking for. I'm satisfied such a list is required, then. > Does a meta [EMAIL PROTECTED] make more sense for this > sort of traffic? (an aggregation of everyone sub'ed to a project-private > list, automerged much like the committers@ manditory subscription list.) > > This would be a way to communicate without additional noise on general@, > which is ignored by WAY too many incubator-people. Seems like a good idea to me. Yoav --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
