Hi,
Two small additions to Dave's list:
On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 3:40 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:
> (1) Discuss, propose and approve on private@. Provide permalink to threads on
> whimsy.
> (2) In case of PPMC then ACK to IPMC.
> (3) Invite individual to role using email templates. PPMC may develop th
Hi Craig,
I can see that in order for the secretary and incubator governance to scale we
need a prescriptive process in terms of steps which can have whimsical tooling.
(1) Discuss, propose and approve on private@. Provide permalink to threads on
whimsy.
(2) In case of PPMC then ACK to IPMC.
Hi Roman,
Thanks for the feedback.
> On May 1, 2018, at 3:23 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>
>> 3. It is not obvious what the policy is for a podling to invite new
>> committers and PPMC members. I don't believe it should be the responsibility
>> of the podling to decide in isolation the proces
On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 4:50 PM, Craig Russell wrote:
> I would respectfully suggest that the PPMC guide section that describes how
> to invite new committers and PPMC members is not adequate to the task.
>
> This is what I think is the relevant section of
> https://incubator.apache.org/guides/p
Hi Craig
In general I agree with:
- Document more details about the process
- Add standard templates for inviting, accepting and welcoming emails to
nominee
I think the process currently describe it works and I don't see why the
need for the change
https://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html
Se
