Hi Roman,

Thanks for the feedback.

> On May 1, 2018, at 3:23 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> wrote:
> 
>> 3. It is not obvious what the policy is for a podling to invite new 
>> committers and PPMC members. I don't believe it should be the responsibility 
>> of the podling to decide in isolation the process to invite new committers, 
>> just as it is not the podlings' decision how to invite new PPMC members.
> 
> I actually don't quite understand this point. Care to elaborate?

The policy appears to be: invite to be a committer whoever you want as long as 
you can get a mentor to request the account. "There are no ASF wide rules..." 
There are a few extra steps in the case of inviting a new PPMC member. I think 
we can do better to guide the podling to adopt a process that is in use by the 
great majority of TLPs.

It is fine if a TLP has a very casual approach to committers. Some, who came to 
Apache after establishing their community processes, will invite a committer by 
one PMC member sending an email and receiving no negative responses. This is 
consistent with the Apache Way but I don't think it is a good example for 
others.

It is much more scalable and easier to provide tooling if a TLP actually does 
follow a script: discuss, vote, invite. And I believe that we should encourage 
podlings to follow a script until they decide they don't like it and are 
willing to document their decision in their project bylaws when they graduate.

Regards,
Craig

> Thanks,
> Roman.

Craig L Russell
Secretary, Apache Software Foundation
c...@apache.org http://db.apache.org/jdo


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Reply via email to