Hi Roman, Thanks for the feedback.
> On May 1, 2018, at 3:23 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> wrote: > >> 3. It is not obvious what the policy is for a podling to invite new >> committers and PPMC members. I don't believe it should be the responsibility >> of the podling to decide in isolation the process to invite new committers, >> just as it is not the podlings' decision how to invite new PPMC members. > > I actually don't quite understand this point. Care to elaborate? The policy appears to be: invite to be a committer whoever you want as long as you can get a mentor to request the account. "There are no ASF wide rules..." There are a few extra steps in the case of inviting a new PPMC member. I think we can do better to guide the podling to adopt a process that is in use by the great majority of TLPs. It is fine if a TLP has a very casual approach to committers. Some, who came to Apache after establishing their community processes, will invite a committer by one PMC member sending an email and receiving no negative responses. This is consistent with the Apache Way but I don't think it is a good example for others. It is much more scalable and easier to provide tooling if a TLP actually does follow a script: discuss, vote, invite. And I believe that we should encourage podlings to follow a script until they decide they don't like it and are willing to document their decision in their project bylaws when they graduate. Regards, Craig > Thanks, > Roman. Craig L Russell Secretary, Apache Software Foundation c...@apache.org http://db.apache.org/jdo --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org