I notice that we already have a place where we can put structured
information. Each project has a .xml file where the status
is recorded. This file gets transformed into the .html file
for the site.
"All we need to do" is to decide on an xml tag that identifies the
reporting schedule and
On 6/19/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/19/07, Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/19/07, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >
wrote:
> > 1. should the information be public?
Yes.
> > 2. should the information be machine readable?
> Not at the expens
On 6/19/07, Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/19/07, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1. should the information be public?
Yes.
> 2. should the information be machine readable?
Not at the expense of making it hard for humans to maintain it. If
you can't m
On 6/19/07, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
1. should the information be public?
Yes.
2. should the information be machine readable?
Not at the expense of making it hard for humans to maintain it. If
you can't make sense of the format in 10 seconds or less, then it's
unlik
On 6/19/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > robert burrell donkin wrote:
> >
> > > Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Leo Simons wrote:
> > > > > This scheduling stuff keeps confusing me. My
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > robert burrell donkin wrote:
> >
> > > Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Leo Simons wrote:
> > > > > This scheduling stuff keeps confusing me. My own calendar says
next
> > > > > month.
> > > > A frequen
On 6/18/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
> Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Leo Simons wrote:
> > > This scheduling stuff keeps confusing me. My own calendar says next
> > > month.
> > A frequent if not constant problem. I keep complaini
robert burrell donkin wrote:
> Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Leo Simons wrote:
> > > This scheduling stuff keeps confusing me. My own calendar says next
> > > month.
> > A frequent if not constant problem. I keep complaining about the
problem
> > of redundant and often incorrect
On 6/18/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Leo Simons wrote:
> This scheduling stuff keeps confusing me. My own calendar says next
> month.
A frequent if not constant problem. I keep complaining about the problem
of
redundant and often incorrect meta-data. To resolve it, I'm cons
On 6/18/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
> noel is having hardware issues and he's asked me to pull this together
so
> it's likely to be a little late
Back online now ... until the service tech shows up tomorrow to replace
the
motherboard, fan, and ke
robert burrell donkin wrote:
> noel is having hardware issues and he's asked me to pull this together so
> it's likely to be a little late
Back online now ... until the service tech shows up tomorrow to replace the
motherboard, fan, and keyboard.
> we could *really* do with one more reviewer
+1
Leo Simons wrote:
> This scheduling stuff keeps confusing me. My own calendar says next
> month.
A frequent if not constant problem. I keep complaining about the problem of
redundant and often incorrect meta-data. To resolve it, I'm considering
deleting the schedules from the Wiki entirely, and
On 6/18/07, Martin van den Bemt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Did a review just now..
thanks
just before i cut the final version :-)
- robert
Did a review just now..
Mvgr,
Martin
robert burrell donkin wrote:
> On 6/18/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> This is due to board@ with PMC oversight/feedback 12 hours from now.
>
>
> noel is having hardware issues and he's asked me to pull this together so
> it's likel
On 6/18/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is due to board@ with PMC oversight/feedback 12 hours from now.
noel is having hardware issues and he's asked me to pull this together so
it's likely to be a little late
Oversight implies at least three reviewers of each report
On Jun 18, 2007, at 7:13 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
This is due to board@ with PMC oversight/feedback 12 hours from now.
Oversight implies at least three reviewers of each report.
According to http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ReportingSchedule and
already recorded in http://wiki.apache.org/
Hi,
On 6/18/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Tika (scheduled July in ReportingSchedule)
Tika is still doing the first three monthly reports and will switch to
the normal quarterly schedule next month.
BR,
Jukka Zitting
-
Wicket was removed prior to its graduation, probably best to add it
until the final vote has been cast. I'll add Wicket to the schedule
again. (we were due in june)
Martijn
On 6/18/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is due to board@ with PMC oversight/feedback 12 hours fro
ADF Faces == Trinidad
=> Graduated
On 6/18/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is due to board@ with PMC oversight/feedback 12 hours from now.
Oversight implies at least three reviewers of each report.
According to http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ReportingSchedule and
alr
19 matches
Mail list logo
