On 6/19/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: > Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > robert burrell donkin wrote: > > > > > Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Leo Simons wrote: > > > > > This scheduling stuff keeps confusing me. My own calendar says next > > > > > month. > > > > A frequent if not constant problem. I keep complaining about the > > > > problem of redundant and often incorrect meta-data. To resolve it, > > > > I'm considering deleting the schedules from the Wiki entirely, and > > > > just using committers/board/incubator-info.txt. > > > the wiki schedules don't seem to work very well > > > i like the idea of using RDF meta-data and storing it in subversion > > So you want to re-cast incubator-info.txt in RDF? > > RDF is the direction that Dave was working on. > i think that there are a couple of distinct questions: > 1. should the information be public? Yes. Why not?
+1
2. should the information be machine readable? IMO, yes.
+1
I like, I think, all of this to be in the STATUS files, putting everything in one place per project, rather than needing to update both the STATUS and incubator-info.txt files. We could then eliminate incubator-info.txt . But am open to other views. The goal should be to eliminate the redundant data, and generate artifacts from a single (optionally, per-project) canonical source. This could tie in well with projects.apache.org.
+1 - robert
