On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 10:46 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 14/08/2009, Eric Evans wrote:
>> The Cassandra community voted on and approved the release of Apache
>> Cassandra 0.4.0-beta1. We would now like to request the approval of the
>> Incubator PMC for this release.
>>
>> Cassandra is a massively sc
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 11:52 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
> Hi Ant,
>
> On Aug 17, 2009, at 8:40 AM, ant elder wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Craig L Russell
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Ant,
>>>
>>> On Aug 17, 2009, at 7:33 AM, ant elder wrote:
>>>
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 3:04 PM, sebb w
Hi Eric,
On Aug 17, 2009, at 8:55 AM, Eric Evans wrote:
On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 13:00 +0100, sebb wrote:
Given whats being said in the "Thrift release
legal issues" thread i think it should be ok to have the 3rd party
licenses separate,
I disagree. It must be possible to find all the LICENSE f
Hi Ant,
On Aug 17, 2009, at 8:40 AM, ant elder wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Craig L
Russell wrote:
Hi Ant,
On Aug 17, 2009, at 7:33 AM, ant elder wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 3:04 PM, sebb wrote:
>> the NOTICE file looks acceptable to me too.
>
> AIUI, the NOTICE file ne
+1 from me.
On Aug 18, 2009, at 2:12 AM, ant elder wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Eric Evans
wrote:
On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 13:00 +0100, sebb wrote:
Given whats being said in the "Thrift release
legal issues" thread i think it should be ok to have the 3rd party
licenses separate,
On 17/08/2009, ant elder wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
> > Hi Ant,
> >
> > On Aug 17, 2009, at 7:33 AM, ant elder wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 3:04 PM, sebb wrote:
> >>
>
> >> the NOTICE file looks acceptable to me too.
> >
>
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 5:51 PM, ant elder wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Robert Burrell
> Donkin wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 4:40 PM, ant elder wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Craig L Russell
>>> wrote:
Hi Ant,
On Aug 17, 2009, at 7:33 AM, ant elder wro
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Robert Burrell
Donkin wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 4:40 PM, ant elder wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Craig L Russell
>> wrote:
>>> Hi Ant,
>>>
>>> On Aug 17, 2009, at 7:33 AM, ant elder wrote:
>>>
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 3:04 PM, sebb wrote:
>>
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 4:40 PM, ant elder wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
>> Hi Ant,
>>
>> On Aug 17, 2009, at 7:33 AM, ant elder wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 3:04 PM, sebb wrote:
>>>
>
> >> the NOTICE file looks acceptable to me too.
> >
>>>
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Eric Evans wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 13:00 +0100, sebb wrote:
>> > Given whats being said in the "Thrift release
>> > legal issues" thread i think it should be ok to have the 3rd party
>> > licenses separate,
>>
>> I disagree. It must be possible to find all
On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 13:00 +0100, sebb wrote:
> > Given whats being said in the "Thrift release
> > legal issues" thread i think it should be ok to have the 3rd party
> > licenses separate,
>
> I disagree. It must be possible to find all the LICENSE files starting
> at the initial LICENSE file
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
> Hi Ant,
>
> On Aug 17, 2009, at 7:33 AM, ant elder wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 3:04 PM, sebb wrote:
>>
>> the NOTICE file looks acceptable to me too.
>
> AIUI, the NOTICE file needs to give attributions to all
Hi Ant,
On Aug 17, 2009, at 7:33 AM, ant elder wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 3:04 PM, sebb wrote:
>> the NOTICE file looks acceptable to me too.
>
> AIUI, the NOTICE file needs to give attributions to all 3rd
party code
> included in the propose release.
no - just require 3rd party
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 3:04 PM, sebb wrote:
>>
>> >> the NOTICE file looks acceptable to me too.
>> >
>> > AIUI, the NOTICE file needs to give attributions to all 3rd party code
>> > included in the propose release.
>>
>>
>> no - just require 3rd party attribution notices and relocated
>> co
On 17/08/2009, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 1:00 PM, sebb wrote:
> > On 17/08/2009, ant elder wrote:
> >> On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 10:46 AM, sebb wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> >> Given whats being said in the "Thrift release
> >> legal issues" thread i think it should be ok t
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 1:00 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 17/08/2009, ant elder wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 10:46 AM, sebb wrote:
>> Given whats being said in the "Thrift release
>> legal issues" thread i think it should be ok to have the 3rd party
>> licenses separate,
>
> I disagree. It must
On 17/08/2009, ant elder wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 10:46 AM, sebb wrote:
> > On 14/08/2009, Eric Evans wrote:
> >> The Cassandra community voted on and approved the release of Apache
> >> Cassandra 0.4.0-beta1. We would now like to request the approval of the
> >> Incubator PMC for t
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 10:46 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 14/08/2009, Eric Evans wrote:
>> The Cassandra community voted on and approved the release of Apache
>> Cassandra 0.4.0-beta1. We would now like to request the approval of the
>> Incubator PMC for this release.
>>
>> Cassandra is a massively sc
On 14/08/2009, Eric Evans wrote:
> The Cassandra community voted on and approved the release of Apache
> Cassandra 0.4.0-beta1. We would now like to request the approval of the
> Incubator PMC for this release.
>
> Cassandra is a massively scalable, eventually consistent, distributed,
> struct
+1 (binding)
I followed the thread and the provided stuff seems to be fine.
-M
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 10:08 PM, Eric Evans wrote:
> The Cassandra community voted on and approved the release of Apache
> Cassandra 0.4.0-beta1. We would now like to request the approval of the
> Incubator PMC for t
20 matches
Mail list logo
