On 2012-05-10, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>> On 2012-05-10, Jukka Zitting wrote:
>>> Your contribution report [1] shows some people who've contributed lots
>>> of patches but aren't committers yet. What's up with that?
>> Many of those contribu
. We'll do what we
can. ~P
> From: jukka.zitt...@gmail.com
> Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 15:55:50 +0200
> Subject: Re: Lucene.NET status
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
>
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> > On 2012-05-10, Jukka Zi
Hi,
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2012-05-10, Jukka Zitting wrote:
>> However, the one thing I am a bit worried about is that I couldn't
>> tell when was the last time you added a new committer to the team.
>
> Never.
OK.
>> Your contribution report [1] shows some
First of all, many thanks, Jukka.
On 2012-05-10, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 12:36 AM, Apache Wiki wrote:
>> One of the mentors (Stefan Bodewig) has indicated he wants to start pushing
>> for graduation. UPDATE: Unfortunately, we have not made any progress on this
>> - hopeful
On 5/9/2012 6:34 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> Jukka:
>
> Thanks my friend. The way you have been running the IPMC during your
> tenure as chair addresses just about everything I have ever bitched
> about regarding the Incubator. I really appreciate what you are doing
> and the time it must take to
Jukka:
Thanks my friend. The way you have been running the IPMC during your
tenure as chair addresses just about everything I have ever bitched
about regarding the Incubator. I really appreciate what you are doing
and the time it must take to do it, but it does not go unnoticed.
- Origina
Good advice. Will do that.
Thanks,
Troy
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 8:47 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
wrote:
> Hi Troy,
>
> I think it would be good to send the below to trademarks@ and to start there.
>
> HTH,
> Chris
>
> On Feb 18, 2011, at 3:13 AM, Troy Howard wrote:
>
>> Ok, I guess by "recentl
Hi Troy,
I think it would be good to send the below to trademarks@ and to start there.
HTH,
Chris
On Feb 18, 2011, at 3:13 AM, Troy Howard wrote:
> Ok, I guess by "recently done by Apache CouchDB" I meant, done in
> 2007, before it was an Apache product, and it wasn't so much a contest
> but a
Ok, I guess by "recently done by Apache CouchDB" I meant, done in
2007, before it was an Apache product, and it wasn't so much a contest
but a single line call for submissions in a very large blog post about
technical matters.
But regardless, they ended up with a great logo.
Thanks,
Troy
On Fri
Benson
Thank you for your support.
Grant,
Where do we go from here?
Scott
From: Benson Margulies [bimargul...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 4:02 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Lucene.Net ready for vote?
I guess I
Y
-Original Message-
From: "Lombard, Scott"
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 13:15:05
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Lucene.Net ready for vote?
Grant,
The proposal is done, how do you feel about putting Lucene.Net to a vote with 2
mentors?
Scott
Much appreciated, Benson!
Thanks,
Troy
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> I guess I could sign up as Mentor.
>
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Lombard, Scott
> wrote:
>> Grant,
>>
>> The proposal is done, how do you feel about putting Lucene.Net to a vote
>> with 2
I guess I could sign up as Mentor.
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Lombard, Scott
wrote:
> Grant,
>
> The proposal is done, how do you feel about putting Lucene.Net to a vote with
> 2 mentors?
>
> Scott
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Grant Ingersoll [mailto:gsing...@apache.org]
> Se
On Friday 22 February 2008 16:01, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> I don't remember seeing a similar case in the past, did we have such a
> situation already?
FtpServer was in a similar position, where the original contributors and
mentors kind of busy with other things, and a single high-spirited so
On Mon, 2008-02-25 at 09:17 -0800, Craig L Russell wrote:
> Hi Erik,
>
> In the incubator, responsibility for proposing new committers lies
> with the PPMC, which is a problem here because both of the folks with
> this responsibility are leaving.
>
> I'd agree with you to kick the project ba
Hi Erik,
In the incubator, responsibility for proposing new committers lies
with the PPMC, which is a problem here because both of the folks with
this responsibility are leaving.
I'd agree with you to kick the project back to the Lucene PMC for
further action.
Restarting the project wil
On Feb 22, 2008, at 7:52 AM, Santiago Gala wrote:
El vie, 22-02-2008 a las 09:34 +0100, Endre Stølsvik escribió:
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Another option might be to take the code somewhere else for a while,
work on it, gather a community and come back to the incubator
when the
project ha
El vie, 22-02-2008 a las 09:34 +0100, Endre Stølsvik escribió:
> Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
>
> > Another option might be to take the code somewhere else for a while,
> > work on it, gather a community and come back to the incubator when the
> > project has gathered some momentum.
>
> Why would
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 9:34 AM, Endre Stølsvik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
>
> > Another option might be to take the code somewhere else for a while,
> > work on it, gather a community and come back to the incubator when the
> > project has gathered some momentum.
>
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Another option might be to take the code somewhere else for a while,
work on it, gather a community and come back to the incubator when the
project has gathered some momentum.
Why would that be a good idea? The infrastructure is already set up and
working at Apache,
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 1:26 AM, Michael Garski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ... I've been in communication with George Aroush, the sole committer on the
> Lucene.Net project, and he is bowing out from further involvement
According to http://incubator.apache.org/projects/lucene.net.html
Luce
: If this is the case, who ever has the karma to fix this, can you take care
: of it?
I think the proper way to deal with this is to file a Jira request with
the Infrastructure Project in the JIRA component, but I'm not 100% sure.
: Also, I can't figure out how to assign, close or even edit a JI
Thanks Hoss. I submitted a JIRA issue:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-852
-Original Message-
From: Chris Hostetter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 2:11 AM
To: Lucene Dev
Cc: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Lucene.NET Jira Emails?
: If this
#x27;t see anything
there to edit this issue. Yes, I am logged in.
Thanks!
-- George
-Original Message-
From: Chris Hostetter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 17, 2006 12:26 PM
To: 'Lucene Dev'
Cc: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Lucene.NET Jira Emails?
: I
Hi Chris,
I don't think this is intentional. Something is broken in the JIRA setup.
I have posted this email on general@incubator.apache.org to see if folks
there may know what's the problem and fix it.
Thanks for noticing
-- George
-Original Message-
From: Chris Hostetter [mailto:[EMA
10:49 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Lucene.Net
George,
This is good information to keep around moving forward, so thanks for
providing that. It will be a factor in making sure the IP rights are free
and clear in order for Lucene.Net to graduate from incubation.
Erik
On
.
Regards,
-- George
-Original Message-
From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 7:06 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Lucene.Net
Yes, I added that wiki piece for Lucene.Net. Please refine it as
desired.
I'm not clear on your
.
Regards,
-- George
-Original Message-
From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 7:06 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Lucene.Net
Yes, I added that wiki piece for Lucene.Net. Please refine it as desired.
I'm not clear on your
Yes, I added that wiki piece for Lucene.Net. Please refine it as
desired.
I'm not clear on your timeline below... when you re-released 1.3-rc3,
that was with Pasha's codebase, right? And what about 1.4-alpha -
was any of that code from Pasha, or was it a from-scratch creation by
you?
Hi Noel,
I see that Lucene.Net has already been updated
(http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/April2006) possibly done by Erik.
In regards to the history of Lucene.Net/DotLucene, here is how it went:
May 2003: 1.3-rc1 was released by Pasha Bizhan
Dec 2003: 1.3-rc2 was released by Pasha Bizhan
Sep 200
(It looks like you were replying to everyone, not just me, so I've
added back the CC to the incubator list on this message).
Thanks for doing this!
I've created the lists. Please let me know if the commits are going to
the right place.
The status page looks ok to me, so please go ahead and publi
Roy raised this in January:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/200601.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
In the following email from David, instructions for how to fix the
status file up were given.
Now that I've found the page, I can see that the project is actually
accepted by the L
On 3/14/06, George Aroush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I have the following JIRA issue open:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-655 -- it has been open for a
> while. Who is tasked by setting up the required mailing list so that I can
> get Lucene.Net infrastructure comple
- George Aroush
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 11:09 AM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Lucene.Net project status?
>
> The mentors should be able to help in all these reg
h
-Original Message-
From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 11:09 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Lucene.Net project status?
The mentors should be able to help in all these regards. While they don't do
all the work, they act as the
The mentors should be able to help in all these regards. While they
don't do all the work, they act as the intermediataries between the
incubator and the project. They likely have access to update svn auth
or know who does (the Lucene PMC chair, most likely), and they have
access to update the stat
Thanks Brett, couple more questions though. I'm very new to the incubation
process and have been reading everything I can find about project lifecycles
and such, but I'm a newbie nonetheless.
> has comments on 15 Jan and 19 Feb asking for an up to date status
file, which isn't here:
http://incub
the mailing request here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-655
has comments on 15 Jan and 19 Feb asking for an up to date status
file, which isn't here:
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/index.html
Once that is in place, I'm sure it can be taken care of pretty quickly.
I wasn't abl
38 matches
Mail list logo
