On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 1:53 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> Still, this isn't the hill I want to die on. I think that starting with an
> empty PPMC is good policy for a variety of reasons, but I'm willing to be
> flexible for the sake of building consensus on how to address the truly
> damaging di
Dislike.
For small projects, PPMC == Committers is a great starting point.
For huge projects like OpenOffice something like this would have been chaos
unleashed.
If it were 3 or 4 then I would not have volunteered to be a Mentor for Apache
Flex.
To me the answer should remain somewhere betwee
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 3:41 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> I am concerned that it would be dis-empowering to the incoming community if
> at least the active and major developers of the podling were not on the PPMC
> at the start.
I don't see how we might divide up an "Initial Committer List" into "a
