ROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of James Carman
> Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2008 8:41 AM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Installers for couchdb
>
>
> Doesn't requiring a library with an excluded license pretty much throw
> the apache
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 8:25 PM, Noah Slater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 05:21:24PM +, Santiago Gala wrote:
>> spidermonkey is the only component that has a more restrictive license, and
>> the third party licensing policy document lists MPL in the B category. So I
>> th
On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 05:21:24PM +, Santiago Gala wrote:
> spidermonkey is the only component that has a more restrictive license, and
> the third party licensing policy document lists MPL in the B category. So I
> think we can choose MPL and distribute it in binary form, etc.
My understandi
bs.jboss.org/drools/ -
http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/XULRunner
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2008 8:13 AM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Installers for couchdb
>
>
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 1:21 PM, Santiago Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> El mié, 09-07-2008 a las 12:41 -0400, James Carman escribió:
>> Doesn't requiring a library with an excluded license pretty much throw
>> the apache license part out the window? Are these optional
>> dependencies? Will cou
El mié, 09-07-2008 a las 12:41 -0400, James Carman escribió:
> Doesn't requiring a library with an excluded license pretty much throw
> the apache license part out the window? Are these optional
> dependencies? Will couchdb run at all without them?
The way I see it Erlang can be considered a "pl
On Jul 9, 2008, at 9:41 AM, James Carman wrote:
Doesn't requiring a library with an excluded license pretty much throw
the apache license part out the window?
No, Apache distributions contain Apache-licensed code and Apache-
compatible-licensed code.
Many Apache projects have dependencies
Doesn't requiring a library with an excluded license pretty much throw
the apache license part out the window? Are these optional
dependencies? Will couchdb run at all without them?
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 12:12 PM, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jul 9, 2008, at 9:37 AM, Philip
On Jul 9, 2008, at 9:37 AM, Philippe Ombredanne wrote:
Howdy:
I am working on couchdb installers that I would like to contribute
back to
the project:
A fully functional CouchDb install has a few external dependencies
such as:
- ICU (ICU License a BSD/MIT style license)
- Mozilla SpiderMon
Howdy:
I am working on couchdb installers that I would like to contribute back to
the project:
A fully functional CouchDb install has a few external dependencies such as:
- ICU (ICU License a BSD/MIT style license)
- Mozilla SpiderMonkey (MPL, GPL or LGPL)
- Erlang (ERLANG PUBLIC LICENSE)
- Opens
10 matches
Mail list logo
