Hi Justin,
I have just signed off and added my comments.
Thank you.
Regards,
Uma
-Original Message-
From: Justin Mclean
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2019 6:03 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [MENTORS] Sign off on Incubator Reports
Hi,
The report has been submitted but
Hi,
The report has been submitted but we’re still missing some sign offs.
If you haevn't signed off the report please do so over at:
https://whimsy.apache.org/board/agenda/2019-12-18/Incubator
It would be good to see more sign off for:
BatchEE
Druid
Hivemall
Marvin-AI
MesaTEE
Samoa
Spot (still m
Okay, all sorted. Thanks for the feedback!
On 8 April 2014 14:46, Noah Slater wrote:
> The deadline is tonight, and the report is supposed to be submitted tomorrow.
>
> On 8 April 2014 14:33, ant elder wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Upayavira wrote:
>>
>>> FWIW as far as I am concer
The deadline is tonight, and the report is supposed to be submitted tomorrow.
On 8 April 2014 14:33, ant elder wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Upayavira wrote:
>
>> FWIW as far as I am concerned, you can 'conditionally' sign off on a
>> report, that is, with comments, if there's things
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Upayavira wrote:
> FWIW as far as I am concerned, you can 'conditionally' sign off on a
> report, that is, with comments, if there's things you need to say.
>
> Upayavira
>
+1 to that. And its still over a week till the baord meeting and lots of
mentors active in
FWIW as far as I am concerned, you can 'conditionally' sign off on a
report, that is, with comments, if there's things you need to say.
Upayavira
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014, at 12:17 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
> The podling in question is Stratos.
>
> There was a lengthy discussion on a thread about gradua
The podling in question is Stratos.
There was a lengthy discussion on a thread about graduation about
diversity. I raised it as an issue, as while the podling has clearly
shown activity around trying to diversify, the actual non-WSO2 to WSO2
spread had not changed much since I last flagged it as a
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 3:29 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
> If a podling you are mentoring completes its report late, and there
> are sections of it you are concerned with, should you sign off on it?
>
> I've pinged the community about my concern, but I'm worried it won't
> be addressed in time for submi
If a podling you are mentoring completes its report late, and there
are sections of it you are concerned with, should you sign off on it?
I've pinged the community about my concern, but I'm worried it won't
be addressed in time for submission tomorrow.
If I sign off on the report, it looks like I
Incubator list, please disregard this request - It has been posted.
Thanks!
Les
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Les Hazlewood wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm having problems posting our incubator board report (Apache Shiro)
> to the wiki - apparently my username/password is no longer working.
> I've
Hi all,
I'm having problems posting our incubator board report (Apache Shiro)
to the wiki - apparently my username/password is no longer working.
I've requested a password reset, but have not received the email to do
so. Is there a way someone please post this in the meantime to ensure
the board
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 11:01 AM, David Crossley wrote:
> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>> reports: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/February2009
>>
>> Nothing for Cassandra, Droids, Lokahi, Pivot, VCL, or WSRP4J. XAP and
>> Stonehenge really should have had more to say.
>
> I am concerned about Cassand
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> reports: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/February2009
>
> Nothing for Cassandra, Droids, Lokahi, Pivot, VCL, or WSRP4J. XAP and
> Stonehenge really should have had more to say.
I am concerned about Cassandra. They are new to the Incubator,
but we have not received any r
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> David Crossley wrote:
> > Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > >
> > > I had asked Dave if he would work on [a Marvin-like script], but I don't
> know that anything
> > > got finished. Anyone want to take a shot at it?
> >
> > Upayavira suggested something useful in another thread.
Craig Russell wrote:
> I believe that while a podling is getting organized (first three
> months) it's unlikely that they will "get" reporting, and during that
> time, the mentors must step up and show the way.
But does that mean advising & assisting, or doing the work?
--- Noel
smime.p
On 2/17/09, Craig L Russell wrote:
>
> On Feb 16, 2009, at 6:58 PM, David Crossley wrote:
>
>>
>> If we keep relying on mentors, then we are not
>> training the podlings in the ASF way. We are actually
>> training them to leave it all up to someone else.
>>
> I believe that while a podling is gett
On Feb 16, 2009, at 6:58 PM, David Crossley wrote:
If we keep relying on mentors, then we are not
training the podlings in the ASF way. We are actually
training them to leave it all up to someone else.
I believe that while a podling is getting organized (first three
months) it's unlikely th
David Crossley wrote:
> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > I had asked Dave if he would work on [a Marvin-like script], but I don't
know that anything
> > got finished. Anyone want to take a shot at it?
> Upayavira suggested something useful in another thread.
> I can do that - when i find the time.
Than
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> >
> > Provided that we get a Marvin like script for PPMC
>
> I had asked Dave if he would work on that, but I don't know that anything
> got finished. Anyone want to take a shot at it?
Upayavira suggested something useful in another thread.
I can do that - when i find th
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 12:34 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> What about banning any releases until the report has been submitted? And if
> necessary, closing off commit karma to make the point stick?
To me, that sounds better than confidential reports. It's public,
transparent, affects the whole
Craig Russell wrote:
> Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> > A practical problem with this approach is that reports are submitted
> > right up to the deadline
> I'm not sure I understand your point. The deadline is the Wednesday a
> week ahead of the board meeting.
I believe that Robert was pointing o
Craig.Russell wrote:
> Note that last month, I was not complaining about the messages, just
> the timing. Apologies if that wasn't clear.
I knew it had to do with the timing, and just that, Craig. No worries.
My point is that people are not getting the reports done on time. Sure
*some* do, such
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> A practical problem [is] that reports are submitted right up to the
deadline
Yes, that's something I discussed last month, and again today with Craig.
> Asking the mentors to submit a confidential report (on private)
> whenever a report is missed would be reasonable
On Feb 16, 2009, at 11:29 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
On 1/19/09, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Craig Russell wrote:
To me it sounds that the Mentors are sleeping
Totally agree, it is the mentors responsibility to make sure
"their"
podlings submit their reports on time.
Totally agree,
On 1/19/09, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> Craig Russell wrote:
>
>> > To me it sounds that the Mentors are sleeping
>>> Totally agree, it is the mentors responsibility to make sure "their"
>>> podlings submit their reports on time.
>> Totally agree, it is the mentors responsibility to make sure "th
Hi Noel,
On Feb 16, 2009, at 9:34 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Why are we being hectored on Monday when the reports are not even
due?
So as an experiment, Craig, here we are with the February report
due. And
without prodding, as I did in January, check out the state of the
podling
report
> Provided that we get a Marvin like script for PPMC
I had asked Dave if he would work on that, but I don't know that anything
got finished. Anyone want to take a shot at it?
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general
What about banning any releases until the report has been submitted? And if
necessary, closing off commit karma to make the point stick?
If the project is hibernating, those would effect it, but as Jukka
suggested, we would simply go through the process of suspending the project.
If the project i
> Why are we being hectored on Monday when the reports are not even due?
So as an experiment, Craig, here we are with the February report due. And
without prodding, as I did in January, check out the state of the podling
reports: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/February2009
Nothing for Cassandr
Provided that we get a Marvin like script for PPMC's to get notified
of a pending report, in my opinion:
- the first missing report should be dealt with by the Mentors on the
podling-dev list (to engage the community), and the podling has to
report the next month.
- the second consecutive missing r
Craig Russell wrote:
> > To me it sounds that the Mentors are sleeping
>> Totally agree, it is the mentors responsibility to make sure "their"
>> podlings submit their reports on time.
> Totally agree, it is the mentors responsibility to make sure "their"
> podlings submit their reports on tim
On Jan 13, 2009, at 2:17 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 10:49 AM, Niclas Hedhman
wrote:
...On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 5:44 PM, Noel J. Bergman > wrote:
I think that it is, unfortunately, time to have a discussion as
to the
consequences of what happens when a project mis
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 10:49 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
...On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 5:44 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
I think that it is, unfortunately, time to have a discussion as to the
consequences of what happens when a project misses its report. Perhap
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 10:49 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
>> ...On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 5:44 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>>> I think that it is, unfortunately, time to have a discussion as to the
>>> consequences of what happens when a project misses its report. Perhaps not
>>> a one-off, but on a
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 12:56 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 5:44 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>> I think that it is, unfortunately, time to have a discussion as to the
>> consequences of what happens when a project misses its report. Perhaps not
>> a one-off, but on a
Lucene.NET posted now, too. Thank you.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Craig.Russell wrote:
> For several months, the practice has been to have podling reports
> posted to the wiki by the Wednesday prior to the board meeting, giving
> 5 days for the IPMC to review the reports
Just to be clear, the Boad report is due on Monday, so those five days would
be some part o
> JSPWiki has been added.
Thank you. :-)
> there were some personal circumstances which made me
> forget to copy it to the wiki earlier today.
No worries. Just trying to make sure that it all gets done. :-)
--- Noel
Where are the reports for BlueSky, Cassandra, Imperius, JSPWiki,
Stonehenge,
Lucene.net, Sanselan, Tashi, Thrift, and VCL? This is unacceptable
to have
so many projects disregarding the need to report.
JSPWiki has been added.
Sorry guys, the report has been ready for a few days in the
Personally, I don't subscribe to changes to the Incubator wiki. I have
no bandwidth to track 19 podlings' updates to the page. So if you
update the wiki without a corresponding discussion, please notify the
dev alias.
And I find it extremely useful to keep the project history in the
proje
> > At the least, BlueSky, Lucene.net, Olio, and RCF have missed the
> > report a few times now. What is their status?
> I think you have Olio confused with some other project.
> Olio has filed a report every time.
I had done a quick check, and noticed the e-mail thread in November about
Olio be
On Jan 12, 2009, at 8:40 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Where are the reports for BlueSky, Cassandra, Imperius, JSPWiki,
Stonehenge,
Lucene.net, Sanselan, Tashi, Thrift, and VCL? This is unacceptable
to have
so many projects disregarding the need to report.
For several months, the practice h
Les Hazlewood wrote:
> I'm happy to put it in the wiki and I will do so as soon as I can.
Thanks. I saw that you guys had done so. :-)
> I did the link because we were modifying the file over the last two
> days.
> I thought I was actually acting in the 'wiki spirit' by ensuring
> that the
On Jan 12, 2009, at 8:40 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Where are the reports for BlueSky, Cassandra, Imperius, JSPWiki,
Stonehenge,
Lucene.net, Sanselan, Tashi, Thrift, and VCL? This is unacceptable
to have
so many projects disregarding the need to report.
At the least, BlueSky, Lucene.net,
Put it in svn 2 weeks before your report is due, send message to your
private list (or dev if that is your process) telling your PPMC
members to look at the report, augment it and ensure it reflects your
status. Then a few days before the due date send a reminder that the
report is now close to bec
Beautimous. That's my preference :)
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 12:40 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
> Les Hazlewood wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny
>> wrote:
>>
>>
What is policy? I'm just trying to learn - thanks for any guidance!
>>>
>>> Just a
Les Hazlewood wrote:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
What is policy? I'm just trying to learn - thanks for any guidance!
Just as I said : write down the report (either as a simple mail, or in SVN),
and when validated by the team, then push the content to
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
>> What is policy? I'm just trying to learn - thanks for any guidance!
>>
>
> Just as I said : write down the report (either as a simple mail, or in SVN),
> and when validated by the team, then push the content to the wiki (not the
> lin
Les Hazlewood wrote:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
JSecurity: I really don't need to go follow URLs into SVN (or tracking down
e-mails as with some others) when assembling the report. Please follow the
practice of putting your report in the Wiki.
I'm happy
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> JSecurity: I really don't need to go follow URLs into SVN (or tracking down
> e-mails as with some others) when assembling the report. Please follow the
> practice of putting your report in the Wiki.
I'm happy to put it in the wiki and
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 5:44 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> I think that it is, unfortunately, time to have a discussion as to the
> consequences of what happens when a project misses its report. Perhaps not
> a one-off, but on a becoming regular process.
Termination after three subsequent mi
Sanselan is there now. Thank you.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
I think that it is, unfortunately, time to have a discussion as to the
consequences of what happens when a project misses its report. Perhaps not
a one-off, but on a becoming regular process.
Rather than put my two cents in on this to start, I'll open the topic, and
ask for contributions of ideas
Where are the reports for BlueSky, Cassandra, Imperius, JSPWiki, Stonehenge,
Lucene.net, Sanselan, Tashi, Thrift, and VCL? This is unacceptable to have
so many projects disregarding the need to report.
At the least, BlueSky, Lucene.net, Olio, and RCF have missed the report a
few times now. What
2007-December Imperius Incubator status report
Imperius has been incubating since November 2007.
Imperius is a rule-based infrastructure management tool
Infrastructure has been partly set up. Mailing lists for dev, commits,
private, and user are operational. The repository has been set up.
Com
Done
On Nov 11, 2007, at 11:02 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Bruce Snyder wrote:
ServiceMix graduated from the Incubator, is it still required to
report?
It is required to clean up http://incubator.apache.org/projects.
--- Noel
---
> With or without Abdera, which is not yet posted.
With. Got it just now.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted.
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> James M Snell wrote:
>
>> I am preparing the Abdera report now; once I hear back from the other
>> committers on whether there is anything else to add I will post it.
>
> The Incubator PMC has a deadline to meet. That deadline is about an hour
> from now. I am
James M Snell wrote:
> I am preparing the Abdera report now; once I hear back from the other
> committers on whether there is anything else to add I will post it.
The Incubator PMC has a deadline to meet. That deadline is about an hour
from now. I am preparing the report now and will submit it.
> Has the November board report deadline changed?
Yes, which is why I told people about it in October and then again over a
week ago. The Board is meeting at ApacheCon this Wednesday.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
ect
Re: November Incubator Reports ARE LATE!
Yes, Noel sent an e-mail [1] about a week ago...
[1]
http://www.mail-archive.com/general%40incubator.apache.org/msg15800.html
On Nov 11, 2007 5:16 PM, Lawrence Mandel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Noel,
>
> Has the November board repo
On Nov 11, 2007, at 12:45 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
... from:
Abdera
Lokahi
NMaven
ServiceMix
Woden
WSRP4J
XAP
Yoko
They must be submitted IMMEDIATELY.
The Yoko report has been submitted. Sorry about the delay.
Regards,
Ala
03:45 PM
> Please respond to
> general@incubator.apache.org
>
>
> To
>
> cc
>
> Subject
> RE: November Incubator Reports ARE LATE!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ... from:
>
> Abdera
> Lokahi
>
MAIL PROTECTED]>
11/11/2007 03:45 PM
Please respond to
general@incubator.apache.org
To
cc
Subject
RE: November Incubator Reports ARE LATE!
... from:
Abdera
Lokahi
NMaven
ServiceMix
Wod
Bruce Snyder wrote:
> ServiceMix graduated from the Incubator, is it still required to report?
It is required to clean up http://incubator.apache.org/projects.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For ad
I am preparing the Abdera report now; once I hear back from the other
committers on whether there is anything else to add I will post it. My
apologies for it being late.
- James
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> ... from:
>
> Abdera
> Lokahi
> NMaven
> ServiceMix
> Woden
>
On Nov 11, 2007 1:45 PM, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ... from:
>
> Abdera
> Lokahi
> NMaven
> ServiceMix
> Woden
> WSRP4J
> XAP
> Yoko
>
> They must be submitted IMMEDIATELY.
ServiceMix graduated from the Incubator, i
... from:
Abdera
Lokahi
NMaven
ServiceMix
Woden
WSRP4J
XAP
Yoko
They must be submitted IMMEDIATELY.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
F
> Could you please clarify "THIS WEEKEND", is it TODAY ? Or Nov 11?
:-) November 9th -- BY the weekend, not AT the weekend.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL P
Hi Noel
Could you please clarify "THIS WEEKEND", is it TODAY ? Or Nov 11?
On 11/4/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's that time again ... :-) The Board is meeting at ApacheCon, so we're
> going to need to be a bit earlier this month. Please have your reports
> completed by
It's that time again ... :-) The Board is meeting at ApacheCon, so we're
going to need to be a bit earlier this month. Please have your reports
completed by THIS WEEKEND at the latest.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mai
Here's the incubator status report for JSPWiki
2007-October JSPWiki Incubator status report
The project has kicked off with some basic infrastructure now in place.
Mailing lists have been set up and subscriptions from the previous
mailing
lists are being transferred.
The svn repository is r
Here's the report for Sanselan.
2007-October Sanselan Incubator status report
The project has kicked off with some basic infrastructure now in place.
Mailing lists have been set up. The structure of the project has been
discussed; plans are to use maven using Jackrabbit as a model.
A site was
> It is that time again ... :-)
I will likely be preparing the October report on the drive home Sunday
afternoon, and submitting it late Sunday night EDT, so please try to have
all reports and reviews completed ASAP.
--- Noel
It is that time again ... :-)
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I notice that we already have a place where we can put structured
information. Each project has a .xml file where the status
is recorded. This file gets transformed into the .html file
for the site.
"All we need to do" is to decide on an xml tag that identifies the
reporting schedule and
On 6/19/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/19/07, Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/19/07, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >
wrote:
> > 1. should the information be public?
Yes.
> > 2. should the information be machine readable?
> Not at the expens
On 6/19/07, Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/19/07, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1. should the information be public?
Yes.
> 2. should the information be machine readable?
Not at the expense of making it hard for humans to maintain it. If
you can't m
On 6/19/07, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
1. should the information be public?
Yes.
2. should the information be machine readable?
Not at the expense of making it hard for humans to maintain it. If
you can't make sense of the format in 10 seconds or less, then it's
unlik
On 6/19/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > robert burrell donkin wrote:
> >
> > > Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Leo Simons wrote:
> > > > > This scheduling stuff keeps confusing me. My
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > robert burrell donkin wrote:
> >
> > > Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Leo Simons wrote:
> > > > > This scheduling stuff keeps confusing me. My own calendar says
next
> > > > > month.
> > > > A frequen
On 6/18/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
> Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Leo Simons wrote:
> > > This scheduling stuff keeps confusing me. My own calendar says next
> > > month.
> > A frequent if not constant problem. I keep complaini
robert burrell donkin wrote:
> Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Leo Simons wrote:
> > > This scheduling stuff keeps confusing me. My own calendar says next
> > > month.
> > A frequent if not constant problem. I keep complaining about the
problem
> > of redundant and often incorrect
On 6/18/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Leo Simons wrote:
> This scheduling stuff keeps confusing me. My own calendar says next
> month.
A frequent if not constant problem. I keep complaining about the problem
of
redundant and often incorrect meta-data. To resolve it, I'm cons
On 6/18/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
> noel is having hardware issues and he's asked me to pull this together
so
> it's likely to be a little late
Back online now ... until the service tech shows up tomorrow to replace
the
motherboard, fan, and ke
robert burrell donkin wrote:
> noel is having hardware issues and he's asked me to pull this together so
> it's likely to be a little late
Back online now ... until the service tech shows up tomorrow to replace the
motherboard, fan, and keyboard.
> we could *really* do with one more reviewer
+1
Leo Simons wrote:
> This scheduling stuff keeps confusing me. My own calendar says next
> month.
A frequent if not constant problem. I keep complaining about the problem of
redundant and often incorrect meta-data. To resolve it, I'm considering
deleting the schedules from the Wiki entirely, and
On 6/18/07, Martin van den Bemt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Did a review just now..
thanks
just before i cut the final version :-)
- robert
Did a review just now..
Mvgr,
Martin
robert burrell donkin wrote:
> On 6/18/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> This is due to board@ with PMC oversight/feedback 12 hours from now.
>
>
> noel is having hardware issues and he's asked me to pull this together so
> it's likel
On 6/18/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is due to board@ with PMC oversight/feedback 12 hours from now.
noel is having hardware issues and he's asked me to pull this together so
it's likely to be a little late
Oversight implies at least three reviewers of each report
On Jun 18, 2007, at 7:13 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
This is due to board@ with PMC oversight/feedback 12 hours from now.
Oversight implies at least three reviewers of each report.
According to http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ReportingSchedule and
already recorded in http://wiki.apache.org/
Hi,
On 6/18/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Tika (scheduled July in ReportingSchedule)
Tika is still doing the first three monthly reports and will switch to
the normal quarterly schedule next month.
BR,
Jukka Zitting
-
Wicket was removed prior to its graduation, probably best to add it
until the final vote has been cast. I'll add Wicket to the schedule
again. (we were due in june)
Martijn
On 6/18/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is due to board@ with PMC oversight/feedback 12 hours fro
ADF Faces == Trinidad
=> Graduated
On 6/18/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is due to board@ with PMC oversight/feedback 12 hours from now.
Oversight implies at least three reviewers of each report.
According to http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ReportingSchedule and
alr
This is due to board@ with PMC oversight/feedback 12 hours from now.
Oversight implies at least three reviewers of each report.
According to http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ReportingSchedule and
already recorded in http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/June2007 ...
Ode
OpenEJB
Wicke
hello noel,
sorry for being late in the game...
I just added ADF Faces (Trinidad)
-M
On 12/18/06, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Noel,
My apologies on behalf of Cayenne. I've added an entry for Cayenne
to the wiki based on the discussions posted to Cayenne-dev last week.
On 1
Mike Kienenberger wrote:
> I've added an entry for Cayenne to the wiki based on
> the discussions posted to Cayenne-dev last week.
Got it.
Please note that newly accepted TLPs have to report every month for the
first three months, so assuming that the Board accepts Cayenne and OFBiz,
that would
Noel,
My apologies on behalf of Cayenne. I've added an entry for Cayenne
to the wiki based on the discussions posted to Cayenne-dev last week.
On 12/17/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> Yes, its that time of the month again, so this should not come as a
Brett Porter wrote:
> I've added the OpenEJB report. Sorry for missing the deadline.
Thanks. I've copied from the Wiki into my e-mail.
Anything that gets in before I go to sleep tonight will make it into the
report. Anything after that takes its chances. I might have time in the
morning befor
I've added the OpenEJB report. Sorry for missing the deadline.
On 18/12/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> Yes, its that time of the month again, so this should not come as a
surprise
> to anyone. Reports are due on or by Friday, December 15, 2006
And, onc
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
