On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> We have another question on this topic... RH counsel wants to know why
>> clause 4 rather than clause 7 of the ICLA doesn't serve our purposes
>> here.* My inexpert answer woul
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We have another question on this topic... RH counsel wants to know why
> clause 4 rather than clause 7 of the ICLA doesn't serve our purposes
> here.* My inexpert answer would be that the ICLA, with the exception
> of clause 7, dea
Hi all,
We have another question on this topic... RH counsel wants to know why
clause 4 rather than clause 7 of the ICLA doesn't serve our purposes
here.* My inexpert answer would be that the ICLA, with the exception
of clause 7, deals with "original" works, which is intended to exclude
"code tha
Adding deltaspike-dev back to the distribution:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 3:01 PM, Gerhard Petracek wrote:
> ok - matt and i just had a short talk with sam to ensure that we are
> talking about the same.
> it isn't the only way, but to resolve it once and for all it's easier to
> handle it via a so
ok - matt and i just had a short talk with sam to ensure that we are
talking about the same.
it isn't the only way, but to resolve it once and for all it's easier to
handle it via a software grant.
@matt:
it would be great if you can contact them again.
@sam:
thx for your help
regards,
gerhard
Thanks for the simple example, Ralph. :)
Matt
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 2:25 PM, ralph.goers @dslextreme.com
wrote:
> I don't have the link in hand at the moment, but lets pretend that someone
> wrote some code under the GPL, LGPL or some other non-Apache license.
> Someone else takes that code a
I don't have the link in hand at the moment, but lets pretend that someone
wrote some code under the GPL, LGPL or some other non-Apache license.
Someone else takes that code and simply changes the license header to the
Apache license. You then, with all good intent, pick up that software and
commit
hi,
in general - fyi:
we don't have a huge import. we discuss single features and if we agree on
one, one of the members (of the original project) commits it. all authors
have their icla on file, joined the project and participate in the
discussion and the release votes.
regards,
gerhard
2012/
This thread brings up another issue. During this process we have
encountered the sentiment that the ASF's insistence on (arguably)
extensive documentation to import e.g. ALv2-licensed code seems to
express a lack of confidence in "its own" license on the part of the
ASF. My response has been, par
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 2:33 PM, ralph.goers @dslextreme.com
wrote:
> I didn't mention CCLA's on purpose. A corporation will have a CCLA on file
> to either a) declare that certain employees are permitted to contribute
> software or b) declare that certain software is contributed to the ASF. A
>
I didn't mention CCLA's on purpose. A corporation will have a CCLA on file
to either a) declare that certain employees are permitted to contribute
software or b) declare that certain software is contributed to the ASF. A
CCLA that is on file that only includes Schedule A doesn't grant the ASF
perm
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 12:43 PM, ralph.goers @dslextreme.com
wrote:
> Sorry for jumping in in the middle.
>
> Code contributed to Apache must be under some form of an agreement. If the
> code was authored by an individual and that individual has an ICLA on file
> then they can contribute the soft
Sorry for jumping in in the middle.
Code contributed to Apache must be under some form of an agreement. If the
code was authored by an individual and that individual has an ICLA on file
then they can contribute the software under their ICLA. If a group of
developers developed something and all hav
hi matt,
imo we have to care about it in case of other external contributions we are
going to get quite soon.
however, in case of seam3 i don't see any issue at all.
#1 redhat has a ccla on file
#2 they contacted us [1] to join forces (and they found out that the asf is
also a great place for the
Hi, all--per [1], "Generally, the mentors of a new project will need
to consult with general@incubator.apache.org or the Apache legal team
about the particular circumstances." So, here I am.
The situation can be read in detail at [2], but in short is this:
DeltaSpike is intended to amalgamate "be
It may also be pertinent to note that the codebases here in question
are also ALv2 licensed.
Matt
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 1:49 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
> Hi, all--per [1], "Generally, the mentors of a new project will need
> to consult with general@incubator.apache.org or the Apache legal team
> a
16 matches
Mail list logo
