: Tim O'Brien [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, December 06, 2004 22:13
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Beehive marketing
>
>
> BEA has a very public marketing campaign around Apache Beehive, and I'm
> not saying this is a bad thing per se. It is good to s
> The word from the PRC
Is that they should be contacted prior to marketing.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
o:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2004 12:28 AM
> To: Noel J. Bergman; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Beehive marketing
>
> --On Tuesday, December 7, 2004 12:12 AM -0500 "Noel J. Bergman"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
--On Tuesday, December 7, 2004 12:12 AM -0500 "Noel J. Bergman"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The PRC is responsible for setting ASF-wide policy regarding permissible
marketing. AFAIK, we do insist that all materials using the name Apache in
conjunction with an incubator project include the disclai
ginal Message-
From: Tim O'Brien [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 06, 2004 22:13
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Beehive marketing
BEA has a very public marketing campaign around Apache Beehive, and I'm
not saying this is a bad thing per se. It is good to see BEA is s
BEA has a very public marketing campaign around Apache Beehive, and I'm
not saying this is a bad thing per se. It is good to see BEA is so
involved with Beehive, and I hope it takes off, but it seems a little
presumptious to advertise for "Apache Beehive" when the project is not
yet incubated.
I