I see the updated page [1]
With the link with the filtered list with only IPMC members [2]
With this the votes will be updated as +3 binding votes and +1 non-binding
votes:
*+1 (binding):*
Justin Mclean
John D. Ament
Jarek Jarcec Cecho <- Our mentor.
*+1(non-binding)*
Atri Sharma
[1] https://i
HI,
> And regarding Jaroslav, I took his name from the emails that I have with
> him but in the incubator list, he is listed as *Jarek Jarcec Cecho
> (jarcec)* that officially is our Mentor (Sorry for the confusion there).
That looks fine as Jarek / Jaroslav is an IPMC member so you do have 3 +1
On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 10:11 PM John D. Ament
wrote:
> I believe this is in part due to an error on the IPMC page on the incubator
> website. Raymundo pinged me privately to ask how to find the listing of
> binding votes. I pointed him to that page. That page does link to the PMC
> list in ph
John In case the filter is not working then we still got the 3rd vote with
Jarcec that is our mentor.
On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 9:10 PM, John D. Ament
wrote:
> I believe this is in part due to an error on the IPMC page on the incubator
> website. Raymundo pinged me privately to ask how to find th
Thanks Justin
But I was told that under the following link I could find the Incubator PMC
members. [1]
Inside that page, it takes you to the Incubator address book and
both listed there. [2]
Atri is listed there as IPMC member unless there is another list that I'm
not aware.
And regarding Jarosl
Thanks Justin
But I was told that under the following link I could find the Incubator PMC
members. [1]
Inside that page, it takes you to the Incubator address book and
both listed there. [2]
Atri is listed there as IPMC member unless there is another list that I'm
not aware.
And regarding Jarosl
I believe this is in part due to an error on the IPMC page on the incubator
website. Raymundo pinged me privately to ask how to find the listing of
binding votes. I pointed him to that page. That page does link to the PMC
list in phonebook, however both PMC and committers are appearing in the PM
Hi,
> With a total of *+4 binding* votes, the vote passes.
>
> *+1 (binding):*
> *Justin Mclean*
> *John D. Ament*
> *Atri Sharma*
> *Jaroslav Cecho*
Sorry but I think you still need another +1 before releasing this. Atri and
Jaroslav are not (that I can see) IPMC members and only IPMC members
Hi All,
The vote for releasing* Apache SPOT 1.0-incubating* is now closed.
With a total of *+4 binding* votes, the vote passes.
*+1 (binding):*
*Justin Mclean*
*John D. Ament*
*Atri Sharma*
*Jaroslav Cecho*
The voting thread can be found here:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/32d7c93fe6
Thanks Atri
We are working on automating the RAT verification for next release so
it can be easy to verify for release voting.
*Raymundo Panduro*
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 9:45 AM, Atri Sharma wrote:
> +1, except that I couldnt run RAT.
>
> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 8:12 PM, Raymundo Pand
+1 (binding)
Jarcec
> On Aug 14, 2017, at 7:45 AM, Atri Sharma wrote:
>
> +1, except that I couldnt run RAT.
>
> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 8:12 PM, Raymundo Panduro wrote:
>> Thanks John!!
>>
>> My comments below!
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 4:38 PM, John D. Ament
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
+1, except that I couldnt run RAT.
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 8:12 PM, Raymundo Panduro wrote:
> Thanks John!!
>
> My comments below!
>
>
> On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 4:38 PM, John D. Ament
> wrote:
>
>> +1 to release, however the following additions need to happen (as called
>> out in this thread):
>
Thanks John!!
My comments below!
On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 4:38 PM, John D. Ament
wrote:
> +1 to release, however the following additions need to happen (as called
> out in this thread):
>
> - Need a clear way to run RAT.
>
*We are working on this with automation script to make it easy to run a
+1 to release, however the following additions need to happen (as called
out in this thread):
- Need a clear way to run RAT
- Need to clarify how to build each component ideally from the top level
- You must *not* create external websites that are referencing the release
of the project. The usage
Hello IPMC members,
Here are the instructions on how to build the release candidate once you
download it.
http://nolamarketing.com/client/apache-spot/download/ (If you don't see the
*Validate Build* section use CTRL + F5 to refresh the page).
Regarding the Licence comment, we updated the files
Hello IPMC members,
Here are the instructions on how to build the release candidate once you
download it.
http://nolamarketing.com/client/apache-spot/download/ (If you don't see the
*Validate Build* section use CTRL + F5 to refresh the page).
Regarding the Licence comment, we updated the files
Hi,
+1 binding
I checked:
- name includes incubating
- hashes and signatures correct
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE is missing a few permissive licensed bundled items. Please fix for
the next release
- NOTICE is good
- no unexpected binary files
- all source files have ASF headers
- Could compile
The rat scripts are only part of the issue. The entire build and check
process should be documented and as automated as possible.
I say this not as a specific pre-requisite for gaining approval for a
release, but as a pragmatic issues. There are 10x more people who will give
you a few minutes of t
On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 11:01 AM, John D. Ament
wrote:
> What Ted said, minus the trolling part.
>
Trolling as a synonym for fishing, not magical creatures living under a
bridge.
You are welcome to use our RAT automation scripts from Apache Arrow:
https://github.com/apache/arrow/tree/master/dev/release
On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Smith, Nathanael P
wrote:
> Correction,
>
> the issue is SPOT-214
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPOT-214
>
> - Nathanael
>
>
>
Correction,
the issue is SPOT-214
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPOT-214
- Nathanael
> On Aug 4, 2017, at 11:08 AM, Smith, Nathanael P
> wrote:
>
> Hi John,
>
> Ray and I had a discussion around this first thing today.
>
> I’ve already opened the issue [spot-213] and we’re working
Hi John,
Ray and I had a discussion around this first thing today.
I’ve already opened the issue [spot-213] and we’re working on that.
for my own understanding,
Would it be helpful if we bumped this issue up the priority list and resolved
prior to this release?
- Nathanael
> On Aug 4, 2017
What Ted said, minus the trolling part.
There needs to be a script that runs RAT of some kind, which should
hopefully be pretty simple to add. Your rat excludes should be in the
release.
I think all of this can be solved in a following release, so please add a
ticket to address. I'll continue t
?!
The normal standard is that this all runs from the build process.
And certainly it should be documented.
Remember, you are trolling for volunteers to sign off on your release.
On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 8:03 AM, Raymundo Panduro
wrote:
> John:
>
> To RUN Rat this is how we do it:
>
> Downloa
John:
To RUN Rat this is how we do it:
Downloading the SPOT Code:
wget https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/spot/1.0-
incubating/apache-spot-1.0-incubating.tar.gz
Uncompress the code:
tar -zxvf apache-spot-1.0-incubating.tar.gz
Download RAT:
wget http://apache.claz.org//creadur/apach
John:
To RUN Rat this is how we do it:
Downloading the SPOT Code:
wget
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/spot/1.0-incubating/apache-spot-1.0-incubating.tar.gz
Uncompress the code:
tar -zxvf apache-spot-1.0-incubating.tar.gz
Download RAT:
wget
http://apache.claz.org//creadur/apache
Its very hard to understand this release. How do I build it? How do I run
RAT?
John
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 11:50 AM Raymundo Panduro
wrote:
> Dear IPMC team,
>
> This is the vote for *Apache SPOT 1.0 (incubating) release*. This is
> the first release of SPOT.
>
>
> The PPMC Vote Threads can
Dear IPMC team,
This is the vote for *Apache SPOT 1.0 (incubating) release*. This is
the first release of SPOT.
The PPMC Vote Threads can be found here:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/69dfe2626c7b803e2a3f26e4d348be8d1941003f0e8166fb8e0e9679@%3Cdev.spot.apache.org%3E
The PPMC vote resul
28 matches
Mail list logo
