Hi,
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 1:13 PM, lewis john mcgibbney
wrote:
> ...We require binding and authoritative VOTE(s), we already have 2, however
> this is not enough to release the code.
> We would like to utilize and leverage the resources of the IPMC to review
> and determine the outcome of OCW 1
On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 5:44 AM, Lewis John Mcgibbney <
lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The reason I have approached the IPMC is that I know there are members of
> the foundation here who can review and provide this RC with an
> authoritative VOTE.
> We have a +1 from Daniel Gruno whih would t
Hi Justin, John D. and others,
On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 10:47 PM,
wrote:
>
>
> Ok... read a little more.
>
> OCW is no longer a podling under incubation. It has its own PMC. The
> IPMC's votes are not binding on the release, I would think.
Apache OCW is a graduated project which currently r
Hi Atri,
On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 10:47 PM,
wrote:
>
>
> Anyway I can help?
>
>
Yes please.
If, based off of my message to general@ you could review and VOTE on the
Apache OCW 1.0.0 RC it would be very much appreciated.
Thank you
The IPMC provides very good documentation on guidance for reviewing
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 2:54 PM, John D. Ament
wrote:
> Does anyone feel member votes are binding without PMC membership? I don't
> recall seeing it but would be happy to be wrong here.
>
No. I don't think they would be any more than the PMC for Hive can vote for
a release of OpenOffice.
This is all speculation..
I would imagine they'd need to be voted into the PMC. Maybe more votes
from the IPMC could coax some binding votes from the PMC
Does anyone feel member votes are binding without PMC membership? I don't
recall seeing it but would be happy to be wrong here.
On Sep 18, 201
Hi,
> OCW is no longer a podling under incubation. It has its own PMC. The
> IPMC's votes are not binding on the release, I would think.
Would other Apache members votes be binding or would them need to be voted into
the PMC?
Justin
please direct any issues to dev@climate
>> Lewis
>> (on behalf of OCW PMC)
>>
>> [0] http://climate.apache.org/
>>
>> ------ Forwarded message --
>> From: Lewis John Mcgibbney
>> Date: Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 1:02 PM
>> Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache O
please direct any issues to dev@climate
> Lewis
> (on behalf of OCW PMC)
>
> [0] http://climate.apache.org/
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Lewis John Mcgibbney
> Date: Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 1:02 PM
> Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Open Climate Workben
)
>
> [0] http://climate.apache.org/
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Lewis John Mcgibbney
> Date: Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 1:02 PM
> Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Open Climate Workbench 1.0.0
> To: d...@climate.apache.org
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> The second release can
; Thank you IPMC for your review, please direct any issues to dev@climate
> Lewis
> (on behalf of OCW PMC)
>
> [0] http://climate.apache.org/
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Lewis John Mcgibbney
> Date: Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 1:02 PM
>
Mcgibbney
Date: Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 1:02 PM
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Open Climate Workbench 1.0.0
To: d...@climate.apache.org
Hi all,
The second release candidate for Apache Open Climate Workbench 1.0.0 is now
available.
The tag for this release is available at:
*http://s.apache.org
12 matches
Mail list logo
