Ant pinged me and gently reminded me there had been no response to his
comment. My apologies for closing the vote before clearing this up.
On Dec 13, 2007, at 3:42 AM, ant elder wrote:
The proposal mentions continuing to allow for independent releases
of the
Yoko code that gets moved to
My +1 ... sorry
On Dec 17, 2007, at 8:36 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Dec 12, 2007, at 5:28 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Tuesday 11 December 2007 11:26, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
[x] +1 Approve the below proposal and code migration to
Apache Geronimo and CXF respectively
+1
On Dec 12, 2007, at 5:28 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Tuesday 11 December 2007 11:26, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
[x] +1 Approve the below proposal and code migration to
Apache Geronimo and CXF respectively
+1
-
To unsubsc
+1
On 11/12/2007, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Below is a proposal that was discussed and brought forward by the Yoko
> Community. In a nutshell the proposal is to create a Yoko sub-project
> of Apache Geronimo for the Core ORB and to move the bindings to CXF.
> Please read the prop
On Dec 11, 2007 2:15 PM, Alexey Petrenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> 2007/12/11, Carl Trieloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > Just to make sure I understand what is happening here - Yoko is going
> > away/ending and getting
> > merged into Geronimo and CXF?
> Yes.
>
> SY, Alexey
>
>
The proposal me
+1
Bill
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Below is a proposal that was discussed and brought forward by the Yoko
Community. In a nutshell the proposal is to create a Yoko sub-project
of Apache Geronimo for the Core ORB and to move the bindings to CXF.
Please read the proposal below for all the detail.
On Dec 12, 2007, at 3:34 AM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Dec 11, 2007 4:14 PM, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yoko has done a release before so I would assume that the due-
dilligence
has been completed.
The Yoko status file has nothing recorded to that effect and it
doesn't seem ri
On Dec 11, 2007 4:14 PM, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yoko has done a release before so I would assume that the due-dilligence
> has been completed.
The Yoko status file has nothing recorded to that effect and it
doesn't seem right to me to go on assumptions.
http://svn.apache.org/r
On Dec 11, 2007 4:09 PM, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I'd say that the respective PMC's should fill up the IP Clearance form and
> treat the incoming code just like any other
> new contribution to an existing project.
The way I
On Tuesday 11 December 2007 11:26, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
[x] +1 Approve the below proposal and code migration to
Apache Geronimo and CXF respectively
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc
I relax here;
+1
--kevan
On Dec 10, 2007, at 10:26 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Below is a proposal that was discussed and brought forward by the
Yoko Community. In a nutshell the proposal is to create a Yoko sub-
project of Apache Geronimo for the Core ORB and to move the bindings
to CXF. Please read the
+1
Craig
On Dec 10, 2007, at 7:26 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
[ ] +1 Approve the below proposal and code migration to Apache
Geronimo and CXF respectively
[ ] 0 No opinion
[ ] -1 Do not approve of the move (please provide rationale
Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://j
Yoko has done a release before so I would assume that the due-dilligence
has been completed.
Dan
On Tuesday 11 December 2007, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> Links to the various relevant threads for anyone interested:
>
> Yoko Threads:
> http://tinyurl.com/2y4sy9
> http://tinyur
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'd say that the respective PMC's should fill up the IP Clearance form and
treat the incoming code just like any other
new contribution to an existing project.
thanks,
dims
Niall Pemberton wrote:
> Links to the various relevant threads for anyone in
Links to the various relevant threads for anyone interested:
Yoko Threads:
http://tinyurl.com/2y4sy9
http://tinyurl.com/2ffkn2
http://tinyurl.com/2glch9
http://tinyurl.com/2d94hw
Geronimo Discussion: http://tinyurl.com/2zr2bh
Geronimo Vote: http://tinyurl.com/2c
2007/12/11, Carl Trieloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Just to make sure I understand what is happening here - Yoko is going
> away/ending and getting
> merged into Geronimo and CXF?
Yes.
SY, Alexey
> Alexey Petrenko wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > 2007/12/11, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> >> Below
Just to make sure I understand what is happening here - Yoko is going
away/ending and getting
merged into Geronimo and CXF?
Carl.
Alexey Petrenko wrote:
+1
2007/12/11, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Below is a proposal that was discussed and brought forward by the Yoko
Community.
+1
2007/12/11, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Below is a proposal that was discussed and brought forward by the Yoko
> Community. In a nutshell the proposal is to create a Yoko sub-project
> of Apache Geronimo for the Core ORB and to move the bindings to CXF.
> Please read the proposal belo
Below is a proposal that was discussed and brought forward by the Yoko
Community. In a nutshell the proposal is to create a Yoko sub-project
of Apache Geronimo for the Core ORB and to move the bindings to CXF.
Please read the proposal below for all the detail.
This proposal was brought fo
19 matches
Mail list logo
