Thanks for the example links- that's really been our strategy at this point
(looking through similar projects).
I started work on some of the issues you pointed out, Josh. If the vote is
reversed, then I would be happy to continue with 0.1 and include the
changes in 0.2.
If we get those two +1s f
And by the way, since this would be Quickstep’s first release under incubation,
I gave them some leniency in my RC5 vote [1] on the dev list. I called out 2
showstopper issues, which they fixed in RC6, and some other issues that they
are going to fix in release 0.2.
(Being a mentor is very much
Given this is Quickstep's first release, yes, I think I could be
persuaded to make this a +1 given LEGAL-291 :)
I don't want to cause more confusion if you've already started
re-rolling things, Marc.
John D. Ament wrote:
So, knowing that some of the files are explained under LEGAL-291, would
So, knowing that some of the files are explained under LEGAL-291, would you
consider changing your vote? While there are some changes to the LICENSE
file, its not a killer (since a user would see the correct licenses in the
source files).
I'd vote a +1 if there's a JIRA covering the fixes. I wou
Marc Spehlmann wrote:
Thank you for reviewing Apache Quickstep 0.1.0 rc6 (incubating), everyone.
With this I will close the vote.
+1
Julian (binding)
Jignesh
-1
Josh (binding)
As we received one -1 binding vote, we will not release rc6.
___
The biggest issue seems to be our licensing check
Thank you for reviewing Apache Quickstep 0.1.0 rc6 (incubating), everyone.
With this I will close the vote.
+1
Julian (binding)
Jignesh
-1
Josh (binding)
As we received one -1 binding vote, we will not release rc6.
___
The biggest issue seems to be our licensing checks.
Now Fixed:
- third_p
-1 (binding)
* xsums/sigs OK
The key you provided isn't the one that was used to sign this release,
FYI. You have D280F52E up on your people space, but used 5A29899A to
sign this release.
* Artifact starts with "apache-quickstep" and includes "incubating"
* DISCLAIMER present
* Missing LICEN
kstep-incubating-0.1.0.tar.gz
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ___
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > The commit to be voted upon:
> > >
> > > https://git-wip-us.apache.o
are located here:
> >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/quickstep/0.1.0/RC6/
> >
> >
> >
> > Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> >
> > https://people.
>
>
>
> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
>
> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/spehl
>
>
>
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Incubating
Quickstep 0.1.0.
>
>
pache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/quickstep/0.1.0/RC6/
>
>
>
> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
>
> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/spehl
>
>
>
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apa
pache.org/keys/committer/spehl
Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Incubating Quickstep
0.1.0.
From: Marc Spehlmann
Date: Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 6:36 PM
Subject: [VOTE] Apache Incubator Quickstep 0.1.0 RC6
To: general@incubator.apache.org
As a general question, do binding votes always get forwarded from the dev
vote, and if so, should we report that in the @general VOTE?
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 11:11 AM, Julian Hyde wrote:
> Forwarding my vote from the dev list:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
>
> > On Mar 10, 2017, at 4:36 PM, Marc Spehlmann
Forwarding my vote from the dev list:
+1 (binding)
> On Mar 10, 2017, at 4:36 PM, Marc Spehlmann wrote:
>
> The Apache Incubator Quickstep community has approved a vote to release
> Quickstep-0.1.0 RC6. Quickstep is a high performance relational database
> system built from the ground up for m
The Apache Incubator Quickstep community has approved a vote to release
Quickstep-0.1.0 RC6. Quickstep is a high performance relational database
system built from the ground up for modern hardware.
This vote will stay open until Wednesday 18:00 cst.
-Marc
___
The vote and results thread from dev:
15 matches
Mail list logo
