Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SPOT 1.0-incubating

2017-08-16 Thread jarcec
+1 (binding) Jarcec > On Aug 14, 2017, at 7:45 AM, Atri Sharma wrote: > > +1, except that I couldnt run RAT. > > On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 8:12 PM, Raymundo Panduro wrote: >> Thanks John!! >> >> My comments below! >> >> >> On Sun, Aug 13, 2

Re: [VOTE] Accept Spot into the Apache Incubator

2016-09-20 Thread Jarek Jarcec Cecho
[ X ] +1 Accept Spot into the Apache Incubator Jarcec > On Sep 20, 2016, at 11:15 AM, Doug Cutting wrote: > > Following the discussion thread, I would like to call a vote on > accepting Spot into the Apache Incubator. > > [] +1 Accept Spot into the Apache Incubator > [] +

Re: [VOTE] Accept Gearpump into the Apache Incubator

2016-03-02 Thread Jarek Jarcec Cecho
+1 Jarcec > On Mar 1, 2016, at 4:53 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > > Greetings, > > The discussion of the Gearpump proposal has concluded. Please vote to > accept Gearpump into the Apache Incubator. I will leave this vote open for > at least the next 72 hours and will aim t

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Sentry

2016-02-25 Thread Jarek Jarcec Cecho
[ X ] +1 Graduate Sentry from the Incubator Jarcec > On Feb 25, 2016, at 7:53 AM, Ralph Goers wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > Ralph > >> On Feb 24, 2016, at 12:20 PM, Sravya Tirukkovalur wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> Following the positive discussi

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Sentry from the Incubator

2016-02-17 Thread Jarek Jarcec Cecho
+1 Binding. Jarcec > On Feb 16, 2016, at 2:07 PM, Sravya Tirukkovalur wrote: > > Justin, > > Yes, for the release 1.5.0 - voting was restarted on the general > list[1]. We later on did releases 1.5.1 (to fix some issues in 1.5.0) > and 1.6.0. > > [1]: > h

Re: [VOTE] Accept Impala into the Apache Incubator

2015-11-25 Thread Jarek Jarcec Cecho
[X] +1, accept Impala into the Incubator (Binding) Jarcec > On Nov 24, 2015, at 1:03 PM, Henry Robinson wrote: > > Hi - > > The [DISCUSS] thread has been quiet for a few days, so I think there's been > sufficient opportunity for discussion around our proposal to br

Re: [VOTE] Accept Kudu into the Apache Incubator

2015-11-24 Thread Jarek Jarcec Cecho
> [X] +1, accept Kudu into the Incubator (binding) Jarcec > On Nov 24, 2015, at 11:32 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > > Hi all, > > Discussion on the [DISCUSS] thread seems to have wound down, so I'd like to > call a VOTE on acceptance of Kudu into the ASF Incubator. The

Re: [VOTE] Release Sentry incubating version 1.6.0 (rc0)

2015-09-16 Thread Jarek Jarcec Cecho
+1 * Signature and checksums fits * Verified top level files (LICENSE, DISCLAMER, …) * Project compiles * Apache Rat is happy with licenses Jarcec > On Sep 15, 2015, at 11:27 PM, Sun, Dapeng wrote: > > Hi IPMC, > > > > This is the incubator release of Apache

Re: [VOTE] Release Sentry incubating version 1.5.1 (rc0)

2015-07-13 Thread Jarek Jarcec Cecho
tested on cluster though. Jarcec > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Shen, Guoquan > Date: Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 6:07 PM > Subject: [VOTE] Release Sentry incubating version 1.5.1 (rc0) > To: "general@incubator.apache.org" > > > Hello IPMC, > We

Re: [VOTE] Accept Parquet into the incubator

2014-05-18 Thread Jarek Jarcec Cecho
> [ X ] +1 Accept Parquet into the Incubator (non-binding) Jarcec On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 02:15:15PM -0700, Chris Aniszczyk wrote: > Based on the results of the discussion thread: > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201405.mbox/%3CCAJg1wMRGhLu4P7LeVQB%2B5K0C-fr

Re: Change of IPMC Chair

2014-02-03 Thread Jarek Jarcec Cecho
Congratulations Roman! Jarcec On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 06:11:42PM -0800, Henry Saputra wrote: > Congrats Roman! > > On Monday, February 3, 2014, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > > > Greetings, > > > > Congratulations to Roman Shaposhnik! The Incubator PMC has voted to

Re: [VOTE] Accept DataFu into the Incubator

2013-12-31 Thread Jarek Jarcec Cecho
+1 (non-binding) Jarcec On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 12:39:15PM -0800, Jakob Homan wrote: > Incubator- > > Following the discussion earlier, I'm calling a vote to accept DataFu as a > new Incubator project. > > The proposal draft is available at: > https://wiki.apache.or

Re: [PROPOSAL] Ivory - Hadoop data management and processing platform

2013-03-13 Thread Jarek Jarcec Cecho
d. In case that you're open to the idea of "open enrolment", I'll be more than happy to sign up as initial contributor. Jarcec P.S. - I found few nits in the docs so I've created github pull request to fix them. Links: 1: http://sqoop.apache.org/ On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 a

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Mayhem proposal

2012-11-01 Thread Jarek Jarcec Cecho
I'm sorry, I probably miss understood the intention here. Jarcec On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 11:21:22PM +0100, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho wrote: > > > As was written - the repository was moved in direction SVN -> GIT using &

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Mayhem proposal

2012-11-01 Thread Jarek Jarcec Cecho
As was written - the repository was moved in direction SVN -> GIT using git-svn including entire history, all branches and tags. Without any issues. We've luckily did not have to do the other way around (GIT -> SVN), so I do have no experience there. Jarcec On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Mayhem proposal

2012-11-01 Thread Jarek Jarcec Cecho
I've been participating in three different projects that were moving from SVN to git (flume, sqoop, mrunit) and we did not experienced any issues with that process. Jarcec On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 12:09:43PM -0700, Craig L Russell wrote: > > On Nov 1, 2012, at 11:59 AM, Christia

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Welcome Roman Shaposhnik to the Apache Incubator PMC

2012-10-19 Thread Jarek Jarcec Cecho
Wow, congratulations Roman! Jarcec On Oct 19, 2012, at 11:09 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > Welcome! > > On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 7:47 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) > wrote: >> Hey Folks, >> >> The Apache Incubator PMC has VOTEd to add Roman Shaposhnik to ou

Re: ${podling}.incubator.apache.org

2012-10-12 Thread Jarek Jarcec Cecho
I also like the idea of moving podling name to domain name. However I'm pretty indifferent between $podling.incubator.a.o and $podling.a.o, so I'm +1 on both (just contributor opinion). Jarcec On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 07:24:10AM -0700, Luciano Resende wrote: > On Friday, October 12

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Flume podling from Apache Incubator

2012-06-05 Thread Jarek Jarcec Cecho
> [ X ] +1 Graduate Flume podling from Apache Incubator Jarcec On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 01:17:57AM -0700, Arvind Prabhakar wrote: > This is a call for vote to graduate Flume podling from Apache Incubator. > > Flume entered the Incubator in June of 2011. Since then it has adde

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Sqoop podling from Apache Incubator

2012-02-28 Thread Jarek Jarcec Cecho
is in place for compatibility without any logic (additional code). Do we really need to remove entirely com.cloudera namespace or is this state acceptable for graduating? Jarcec On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 10:39:35AM +0200, Alex Karasulu wrote: > On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:10 PM, Alan Gate

'' Re: [VOTE] Graduate Sqoop podling from Apache Incubator

2012-02-24 Thread Jarek Jarcec Cecho
[ X ] +1 Graduate Sqoop podling from Apache Incubator (Non-binding) Jarcec On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 01:34:09PM -0800, Arvind Prabhakar wrote: > This is a call for vote to graduate Sqoop podling from Apache Incubator. > > Sqoop entered Incubator in June of 2011. Since then it has ad

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Sqoop from Apache

2012-02-19 Thread Jarek Jarcec Cecho
+1. Jarcec On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 09:22:01AM -0800, Arvind Prabhakar wrote: > The Apache Sqoop project entered incubator in June of 2011. Since then we > have added three new committers from diverse organizations and added two > new PPMC members. The codebase of our product has stead

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Sqoop from Apache Incubator

2012-02-19 Thread Jarek Jarcec Cecho
+1 Jarcec On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 01:00:57AM -0800, Arvind Prabhakar wrote: > The Apache Sqoop project entered incubator in June of 2011. Since then we > have added three new committers from diverse organizations and added two > new PPMC members. The codebase of our product has stead

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Sqoop version 1.4.1-incubating

2012-02-14 Thread Jarek Jarcec Cecho
Thank you very much for your comment Roman. I didn't know that we're causing you problems by using different naming convention than other hadoop related projects. I've filled JIRA SQOOP-439 to make this change happen. Jarcec On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 11:42:20PM -0800, Roman S

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Sqoop version 1.4.1-incubating

2012-02-14 Thread Jarek Jarcec Cecho
Hi Roman, we're definitely open to embrace any Apache policy for naming files. Can you point me to some written docs? We're currently appending "-src" postfix to stress out that it's only source artifact whereas other artifacts also contains binaries. Jarcec On Tue, F

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Sqoop version 1.4.1-incubating

2012-02-14 Thread Jarek Jarcec Cecho
with the release process. Jarcec On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 07:33:03PM +0100, Jarek Jarcec Cecho wrote: > I'm closing this vote. I'll sent results shortly. Thanks to everyone who > participated! > > Jarcec > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 06:38:16PM +0100, Jarek Jarcec

Re: [VOTE] Release Sqoop version 1.4.1-incubating

2012-02-14 Thread Jarek Jarcec Cecho
I'm closing this vote. I'll sent results shortly. Thanks to everyone who participated! Jarcec On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 06:38:16PM +0100, Jarek Jarcec Cecho wrote: > This is the second incubator release for Apache Sqoop, version > 1.4.1-incubating. > > We already have one

Re: [VOTE] Release Sqoop version 1.4.1-incubating

2012-02-13 Thread Jarek Jarcec Cecho
Thank you for your feedback sir. If it's not an blocker, we will fix that in next release. Jarcec On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 12:41:00AM +, sebb wrote: > On 10 February 2012 19:27, Jarek Jarcec Cecho wrote: > > This is the second incubator release for Apache Sqoop, vers

[VOTE] Release Sqoop version 1.4.1-incubating

2012-02-13 Thread Jarek Jarcec Cecho
is new vote. Thanks, Jarcec *** Please cast your vote by 2012-02-14 *** Dev list vote thread: http://markmail.org/message/alpqeqwliq4xbbcc The list of fixed issues: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/sqoop/branches/branch-1.4.1/CHANGES.txt The tarball (*.tar.gz), signature (*.asc), checks

Re: [VOTE] Release Sqoop version 1.4.1-incubating

2012-02-12 Thread Jarek Jarcec Cecho
The list of fixed issues: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/sqoop/branches/branch-1.4.1/CHANGES.txt The tarball (*.tar.gz), signature (*.asc), checksum (*.md5), and test result (log/*.ant_test.log): http://people.apache.org/~jarcec/sqoop-1.4.1-incubating-rc3/ The tag to be voted upon:

[VOTE] Release Sqoop version 1.4.1-incubating

2012-02-10 Thread Jarek Jarcec Cecho
The list of fixed issues: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/sqoop/branches/branch-1.4.1/CHANGES.txt The tarball (*.tar.gz), signature (*.asc), checksum (*.md5), and test result (log/*.ant_test.log): http://people.apache.org/~jarcec/sqoop-1.4.1-incubating-rc3/ The tag to be voted upon: