Hi,
just a note on the ARAI acronym if used as such. That acronym usually
refers to: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Accessibility/ARIA
aka https://www.w3.org/TR/wai-aria/ .
Cheers
Daniel
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 4:47 PM, Arthur Berezin
wrote:
> Hi All
>
>
> I would like to propose
Hi Amareshwari,
please have a look at the Apache Incubator Proposal Guide [1]. Under the
section "Community" [2] you'll find the following statement:
"Apache is interested only in communities."
Does this answer your question?
[1] http://incubator.apache.org/guides/proposal.html
[2] http://incub
Just as a quick remark. Geode might be a trademark owned by AMD:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geode_%28processor%29
Cheers
Daniel
On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 8:46 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I would like to open up a discussion thread on
> the proposals for the core of Pivotal's GemFire
>
[ X ] +1 accept Tamaya in the Incubator
[ ] ±0
[ ] -1 because...
Cheers
Daniel S. Haischt
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 3:49 PM, David Blevins
wrote:
> +1
>
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Gerhard Petracek
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > regards,
> > gerhard
> >
> >
> >
> > 2014-11-13 9:16 GMT+01:00
[ X ] +1 Graduate the Apache Celix podling from Apache Incubator as a TLP
[ ] +0 Indifferent to the graduation status of Apache Celix podling
[ ] -1 Reject graduation of Apache Celix podling from Apache Incubator
because ...
Cheers
Daniel
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Alexander Broekhuis
wro
[ X ] +1 accept Fleece in the Incubator
[ ] +/-0
[ ] -1 because...
Cheers
Daniel
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
wrote:
> Following the discussion earlier, I'm calling a vote to accept Fleece as a
> new Incubator project.
>
> The proposal draft is available at:
> https:/
If Emma "enacts" your bytecode like Cobertura does for instance, you may
consider not shipping such bytecode as well. Instead ship the one without
debug symbols and the one which hasn't been "enacted" to be consumed by
code coverage tools et al.
Cheers
Daniel
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Ben
Hi,
out of curiosity - how does this relate to or maybe even complement Eclipse
Lyo [1]? For instance is Lyo one of the Enterprise Linked Data scenarios
which you have been mentioning above?
[1] http://www.eclipse.org/lyo/
Cheers
Daniel
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 6:14 PM, Sebastian Schaffert <
se
Heh yeah I as well had the tuplespace implementation associated with Linda
as I read Apache Linda :) Where Linda itself might have become historic,
the concept still is in use. E.g. [1].
[1]
http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1739850&CFID=202524342&CFTOKEN=19022440
Cheers
Daniel
On Fri, Nov 16,
A few comments in regards to the proposal draft and "linked data"
specifically:
* maybe consider calling out that you are striving towards implementing the
Linked Data Platform 1.0 W3C draft (at least that's how I understand the
proposal)
* will Linda (or whatever name you'll choose) cover data go
Btw, the important part missing up to now in this discussion is the OPEN in
Linked OPEN Data. If I get it right without openness the whole idea will be
crippled to a certain extend.
Cheers
Daniel
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 1:12 AM, Sebastian Schaffert <
sebastian.schaff...@salzburgresearch.at> wrot
Btw, I think the Wikipedia reference in the Tuple Space article to the
blackboard metaphor is misleading cause it's already bound to AI expert
systems such as Hofstadter's copycat... if I have collected enough evidence
I'll change the article accordingly :)
Cheers
Daniel
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at
tuplespaces are STILL well known and Linda is one or even its original
implementation where JavaSapces is another and later on grid computing
borrowed some ideas [1] from it etc pp. So I wouldn't make a statement as
such as Linda nowadays is "ancient" technology (to use a strong term).
Anyway we ha
Well I still opt to use Meta descriptors such as Maven POMs or CMake
(probably only applicable for native projects) files in such cases
which would allow to generate Eclipse/IDE you name it specific files
once the sources has been obtained.
Cheers
Daniel
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 10:22 PM, sebb wr
Well I think Maven allows to create both Eclipse and IDEA IntelliJ
projects including metdata artifacts such as .classpath files...
Cheers
Daniel
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Alexei Fedotov
wrote:
> The most useful file containing the project classpath is only formatted
> automatically, it c
The more practical and pragmatic question to pose is: why would you
want to add license headers to generated files. You would have to take
care of that they won't disappear each time the file (e.g. .classpath)
is getting re-generated. Again from a practical point of view a
mentoring suggestion coul
lipse-generated in the beginning ;)
Cheers
Daniel
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:07 AM, dsh wrote:
> The more practical and pragmatic question to pose is: why would you
> want to add license headers to generated files. You would have to take
> care of that they won't disappear each time the fi
[X] +1: accept CloudStack into Incubator (non-binding)
[] +0: don't care
[] -1: do not accept CloudStack into Incubator (please explain the objection)
Cheers
Daniel
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 3:32 AM, Kevin Kluge wrote:
> Hi All. I'd like to call for a VOTE for CloudStack to enter the Incubator.
Rob,
I read your initial comment as such as you would have been worried
about the licensing terms of the developer program itself [1] and
probably the App Store usage guidelines [2].
Apple SDKs can be downloaded free-of charge without requiring a
developer account and as William pointed out they
+1
Cheers
Daniel
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 7:43 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> On 3/31/2012 8:43 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 7:20 AM, Ross Gardler
>> wrote:
>>
>>> There isn't (to my knowledge), I can imagine an increasing number of
>>> projects wanting such a thing though. Un
It might as well be worth discussing whether it would be possible to
arrange something similar as the MSDN agreement with Microsoft where
ASF committers would have "wild card access" to the iOS developer
program, the Mac developer program and the Safari developer program. I
currently have each of t
[ x ] +1 Accept Openmeetings for incubation
[ ] +0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Reject for the following reason:
Cheers
Daniel
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 7:53 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> Opemeetings proposal has been discussed a few times here before. The group of
> developers behind it worked hard (and succ
Out of curiosity, are there any reasons to not develop the proposal on
the incubator wiki [1]?
[1] http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/
Cheers
Daniel
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 11:41 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Francis De Brabandere
> wrote:
>> Just a small rema
ru/
> +7 916 562 8095
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:20 PM, dsh wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> please find my feedback below:
>>
>> OS X Lion:
>>
>> * tested with:
>> ** Firefox 5.0.1 and Adobe Flash Player 10.3
>> ** Safari 5.1 and Adob
Sebastian,
btw, I noticed that the JNLP app remains open after you closed the
browser. That's probably because the main browser app and the JNLP app
are not tightly coupled if it comes to even notivication such as a
browser close even (it's been a will since I did Java webstart apps
the last time
, 2011 at 8:20 PM, dsh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> please find my feedback below:
>
> OS X Lion:
>
> * tested with:
> ** Firefox 5.0.1 and Adobe Flash Player 10.3
> ** Safari 5.1 and Adobe Flash Player 10.3
> * Observations:
> ** Openmeetings did not work with Firefox/Safari if
Hi,
please find my feedback below:
OS X Lion:
* tested with:
** Firefox 5.0.1 and Adobe Flash Player 10.3
** Safari 5.1 and Adobe Flash Player 10.3
* Observations:
** Openmeetings did not work with Firefox/Safari if using a webcam/mic
cause on the adobe flash player settings dialog it was not po
Only mankinis are allowed. Look that up on Google :)
Cheers
Daniel
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> What's the policy on making t-shirts for an incubating project?
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
>
> -
> To unsu
I guess the "official" proposal is here, right?
-> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/KafkaProposal
Cheers
Daniel
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 8:47 PM, Chris Burroughs
wrote:
> Clearspring was persuaded by the excellent design document [1] to adopt
> Kafka for some of our recent internal products. T
Btw, your mails appear to be sent twice to the ML. I recognized that
before already...
Cheers
Daniel
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 10:23 PM, Mathias Bauer wrote:
> Sorry,
>
> this was a mistake, I used a wrong mail address; ignore this posting,
> please.
>
> regards,
> Mathias
>
> On 12.06.2011 15:51,
Hi Kazunari,
that's an explanation of the role "Champion" as it can be found at the
Apache incubator proposal guide [1]:
The Champion is a person already associated with Apache who leads the
proposal process. It is common - but not necessary - for the Champion
to also be proposed as a Mentor.
A
[ X ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation (non-binding)
[ ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
[ ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation
Cheers
Daniel
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> *** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE]
>
>
1 PM, wrote:
> dsh wrote on 06/08/2011 12:15:52 PM:
>
>>
>> Of course we had been using ODFDOM but the issue is how do you get ODF
>> transformed accordingly to other formats such as RTF, AFP or PDF and
>> make those formats look consistent with what you would get if
x27;s an off-topic detail that may distract others
from the initial intent of this thread.
Cheers
Daniel
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 6:04 PM, wrote:
> dsh wrote on 06/08/2011 10:37:46 AM:
>
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 3:58 PM, wrote:
>> > A sufficiently complex business
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 3:58 PM, wrote:
> A sufficiently complex business application based on OpenOffice is going
> to involve document manipulations at both tiers. For example, we recently
> (at IBM) made an insurance solution that involved using Symphony, extended
> with a Plugin, submitting d
I guess if I get it correct the point in here is that most of us are
legal layman and thus it's not necessarily efficient if we try to sort
out legal concerns on our own. Instead this is supposed to be IP and
patent attorney business from my PoV. If assistance in this regards is
required it might b
The only widget's I used with Lotus Symphony are widgets similar to
[1]. Not sure whether it would be possible to use iWidgets originating
from Lotus Mashups or even OpenSocial Gadgets in a similar way like
they could be consumed by Rational Team Concert [2].
[1] http://www-10.lotus.com/ldd/lswiki
Andreas,
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Andreas Kuckartz wrote:
> I also notice that IBM currently does not sell Lotus Symphony but makes
> binaries available for free:
> http://www.ibm.com/software/lotus/symphony
>
Although you can download IBM Lotus Symphony for free it is still
licensed as
+1 (I like the positive tone that tries to omit words having a
negative connotation)
Cheers
Daniel
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 12:16 AM, Simon Phipps wrote:
> I suggest:
>
> "The LibreOffice project is an important partner in the OpenOffice.org
> community, with an established potentially highly comp
Rob,
I think being more open concerning collaboration can't hurt what do
you think? So it would be nice if the proposal could be open and
diplomatic in this regards. Probably the intention should be to not
shut the door in the very beginning and thus omit collaboration with
other parties. Tho, whe
+1
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 8:13 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
> I don't see any of this discussion about numbers being helpful, only
> divisive. "My numbers are right." "No, they're not. See?" "But those numbers
> are too small."
>
> Get over it already, people. Find something substative to discuss.
>
> -
t 12:12 AM, wrote:
> Greg Stein wrote on 06/02/2011 05:45:57 PM:
>
>
>> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 16:55, wrote:
>> > dsh wrote on 06/02/2011 04:44:26 PM:
>> >
>> >>
>> >> IMHO "the project" is "on track" the community just
Sorry no tab keys involved ... I'd like to indent with spaces :D :D
Cheers
Daniel
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 10:55 PM, wrote:
> dsh wrote on 06/02/2011 04:44:26 PM:
>
>>
>> IMHO "the project" is "on track" the community just needs to discuss
>> so
aying in this regards "I
only believe in statistics that I doctored myself" and that's
certainly one reason why I feel suspicious about these kind of
analysis :)
Cheers
Daniel
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 10:18 PM, wrote:
> dsh wrote on 06/02/2011 04:05:38 PM:
>
>>
>> IM
a bad taste in an OSS environment and
is probably counter productive and it's probably a dead end in a
commercial environment if you want to "performance measure" people
that way.
Cheers
Daniel
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 10:10 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 16:05, d
Rob,
IMHO you should not discuss or question the LO community size
respective its vitality in any way at this place. That's certainly not
the scope of the OpenOffice Apache incubation proposal anyway. The
goal of the proposal as I understand it is to build a vital community
around it at the ASF an
e" in your message. And others
> didn't see it in the quoted sections.
>
> It happens
>
> Cheers,
> -g
>
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 18:31, dsh wrote:
>> Again,
>>
>> "to me" means to me as in it's my personal opinion and nothi
1, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 01/06/2011 19:51, robert_w...@us.ibm.com wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> dsh wrote on 06/01/2011 02:16:58 PM:
>>>>
>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>>> And is it ge
, Greg Stein wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 17:20, Benson Margulies wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
>>>> On 01/06/2011 19:51, robert_w...@us.ibm.com wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> dsh wrote on 06/01/2011 02:16:58 PM:
To me the proof point whether this proposal will be successful or not
is whether Linux distributions having already dropped support for
OpenOffice and switched to LibreOffice instead would be willing to
reverse that decision and move back to OpenOffice again now that it is
in a process to be propos
There as well existed an open source project called Howl in 2005 or so
which implemented Zeroconf (Apple calls the commercial incarnation
Bonjour).
See: http://www.porchdogsoft.com/ -> About
Howl is available in the FreeBSD ports collection and on SF.NET
-> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/url.cgi?po
http://www.porchdogsoft.com/ as well provides a Zeroconf
implementation called Howl and I am not sure whether Porchdog Software
finally got acquired by Apple. The favicon and certain information on
the site could make you think Apple did exactly that.
Cheers
Daniel
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 5:17 PM
There as well exists a Zeroconf implementation called Howl and I am
pretty certain that some other projects are using that name too.
Cheers
Daniel
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 6:57 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din
wrote:
> Good catch, but allow me to disagree with you. Howl here is a name,
> while OW2 HOWL i
[X ] +1 Accept Lucene.Net for incubation
[ ] +0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Reject for the following reason:
Cheers
Daniel
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 7:05 AM, Troy Howard wrote:
> All,
>
> Since posting the Lucene.Net Incubator proposal announcement on Jan
> 12th, we now have three mentors signed up and woul
[X] +1 to accept EasyAnt into the Incubator
[] 0 don't care
[] -1 object and reason why.
Cheers
Daniel
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
> I would like to present for a vote the following proposal to be sponsored by
> the Ant PMC for a new "EasyAnt" podling.
>
> The pr
gets
>> separated into multiple modules, then the build system can actually mange
>> internal dependancies.
>>
>> Of course checking Jars in to SVN is usually simpler in the short term.
>>
>> ~Michael
>>
>> On Jan 9, 2011, at 4:55 PM, dsh wrote
s/way/idea/
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 1:54 AM, dsh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd suggest to consider dependency management systems such as Apache
> Maven or Apache Ivy as an advantage in the long run. They allow to
> precisely document your dependencies and both support an offline mode.
Hi,
I'd suggest to consider dependency management systems such as Apache
Maven or Apache Ivy as an advantage in the long run. They allow to
precisely document your dependencies and both support an offline mode.
Additionally both of course provide a very reliable way to define
exactly what version
+1 (non-binding)
Cheers
Daniel
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 9:16 PM, Dan Peterson wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> We'd like to propose Wave for entry into the ASF incubator.
>
> The draft proposal is available at:
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WaveProposal
> (for your convenience, a snapshot is also cop
+1 (non-binding)
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 12:51 PM, Jeremy Hughes wrote:
> Hi IPMCers and Incubator community,
>
> The Aries community has been discussing graduation and we feel we are
> ready to graduate to a new TLP [1]. We subsequently voted [2]. As a
> commnunity we were unanimous in deciding
+1 (non-binding)
Cheers
Daniel
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 12:36 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> I am pleased to offer, for your consideration, the following proposal to
> accept Jena, a semantic web framework into the incubator. The text of the
> proposal is copied here for your convenience and can be fou
61 matches
Mail list logo
