Re: [VOTE] Accept Drill into the Apache Incubator

On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 4:41 AM, Ted Dunning wrote: >> I would like to call a vote for accepting Drill for incubation in the >> Apache Incubator... > > +1 +1 cheers, Torsten ---

Re: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.3.0-final

Well, isn't public domain == do with it whatever you like with it? So I don't see a problem there. cheers -- Torsten On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 09:30, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 7:01 PM, Eric Evans wrote: >> The Cassandra community voted on approved the release of Apache >>

Re: Stepping back as mentor for Cassandra

Awesome! Thanks! On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 21:28, ant elder wrote: > Ok Torsten I can take your place as i've already been helping out there a bit. > >   ...ant > > On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 8:22 PM, Torsten Curdt wrote: >> No reaction at all? >> Someone free to step up?

Re: Stepping back as mentor for Cassandra

No reaction at all? Someone free to step up? On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 19:49, Torsten Curdt wrote: > Hey folks, > > I would like to step back as a mentor for the Cassandra project. Would > be great if we could find a replacement soon. > > What initially has been quite an problem

Stepping back as mentor for Cassandra

Hey folks, I would like to step back as a mentor for the Cassandra project. Would be great if we could find a replacement soon. What initially has been quite an problematic start, it now seems to be humming away nicely. I just noticed that I don't really have appropriate time and dedication anymo

Re: [PROPOSAL] Commons Incubator

No harsh feelings but I give up. You do not hear what I am saying. On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 14:32, Niclas Hedhman wrote: > On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 7:27 PM, Torsten Curdt wrote: > >> Too often had the discussion at Commons whether this library needs to >> go through incubatio

Re: [PROPOSAL] Commons Incubator

On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 05:15, Noel J. Bergman wrote: >> My view, and I believe Torstens view is that to become a committer means > to >> join the dev lists, send in patches, be part of the community, gain trust >> with the project members and then after a while be voted in as a > committer. > > T

Re: [PROPOSAL] Commons Incubator

On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 04:34, Noel J. Bergman wrote: >> Well, the point is: we are  talking about small libraries. > > That's code.  What about community, Torsten?  What is the Community?  It has > been the Apache Commons as a collective, not sub-projects.  Is that to > change?  We do not want Ap

Re: [PROPOSAL] Commons Incubator

> My view, and I believe Torstens view is that to become a committer means to > join the dev lists, send in patches, be part of the community, gain trust > with the project members and then after a while be voted in as a committer. > Now if someone has a nice great big chunk of code, or even a whol

Re: [PROPOSAL] Commons Incubator

> I think this is a self-imposed constraint. Indeed it is. > Many other projects have no > problem bringing in 'bulk' via IP Clearance and taking in one or two > committers with it. Well, some do :) That's why now there is the proposal I guess ;) cheers -- Torsten -

Re: [PROPOSAL] Commons Incubator

On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 10:22, Niclas Hedhman wrote: > On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 6:32 PM, Torsten Curdt wrote: >> Well, the point is: we are  talking about small libraries. >> >> Imagine there is library X which was developed by only 2 developers. >> They want to bring

Re: [PROPOSAL] Commons Incubator

Well, the point is: we are talking about small libraries. Imagine there is library X which was developed by only 2 developers. They want to bring this code to Commons. What to do? IP clearance is one thing. But what about the 2 developers? Just make them committers while they have no clue about A

Re: Missing board reports, due today!

On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 11:16, Martijn Dashorst wrote: > The following podlings should report today on their status, but have > yet to write up their report [1]: > > Bluesky > Cassandra ... > Please submit your report today! Remember to include: Added the Cassandra one! cheers -- Torsten ---

Re: [MISSING REPORTS]: Bluesky, Cassandra, Kato,Log4php,Shindig,Stonehenge

I am away on vacation and not really well connected. Could someone else write add/complete my lines to the incubator report? Brian? Ian? But to sum it up: Cassandra had a very(!) slow start. First code just got in a couple of days ago. Hardly any traffic on the lists yet. (a little concerne

Re: [VOTE] Accept Cassandra into the Incubator

>> > [ ] +1 Accept Cassandra as a new podling >> > [ ] -1 Do not accept the new podling (provide reason, please) >> >> -1 (binding). >> >> I will even give reasons because it is Christmas; >> a. See Martijn's concern. >> b. Running vote over Christmas when *many* people are busy with other >> thi

Re: Cassandra Incubator Proposal

>> Isn't the champion expected to be the ubermentor anyway? > > Oh, please, no. :-) Leave off the adjective. The Champion can be expected > to be a Mentor (see below, though). No extra uber anything. No greater (or > lessor) of equals. Well, that's somehow how I read it from http://incubator

Re: Cassandra Incubator Proposal

Isn't the champion expected to be the ubermentor anyway? Or to rephrase this: does the vote of the champion not count? ... or can one person be champion and mentor? Anyway ... I think it would be nice to find more than just 3 mentors. BTW: Just realized I am not members of the Incubator PMC. Wasn

Re: Cassandra Incubator Proposal

"None of the developers are salaried specifically to work on Cassandra to our knowledge" None of the developers is working on this project during work hours? "Cassandra has already attracted a stable base of users" Do you have a ballpark of how many users? "External Dependencies" I would list

Re: [Proposal] Helenus - a Cassandra fork

> There seem to be good reasons for attempting a fork of the project. > However, my gut feeling says that this is a very political thing and > should better be started on neutral ground (from an Apache perspective). > > Apache is a home for voluntary contributions. If Facebook is the > original sou

Re: Incubator Proposal: Pig

Done! On 20.09.2007, at 19:46, Doug Cutting wrote: Torsten Curdt wrote: +1 Actually I would also be interested in stepping up as a mentor. Thanks, that'd be great! Please add yourself to the proposal in the wiki.

Re: Incubator Proposal: Pig

On 20.09.2007, at 19:06, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: On 9/20/07, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sep 18, 2007, at 9:52 PM, Olga Natkovich wrote: Yahoo! research and development teams have developed a proposal below. The proposal is also available on wiki at

Re: [pre-proposal] AsyncWeb

On 7/12/06, peter royal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have been talking with Dave Irving who is the principal developer behind AsyncWeb, , an HTTP engine built upon MINA , on bringing the project to the ASF. I've started

Re: ARI, Atom Reference Implementation [Proposal]

> IIRC, FeedParser is languishing for need of a community. It really ought to just be dead. Kevin (original coder) decided to fork it externally so he wouldn't be tied up by our focus on not having single coder codebases (if I understand things correctly). There wasn't any interest in FeedParser

Re: Name options (was Re: ARI, Atom Reference Implementation [Proposal])

Ok, so here are a few of the name options that seem to be the safest (in no particular order) Iaea (adapted, of course, from the U.N. nuclear watchdog group) Anu (Dims suggestion, sanskrit for "atom") Atomico (Spanish/Italian for "atomic") Dalton(Suggested by Robe

Re: Name options (was Re: ARI, Atom Reference Implementation [Proposal])

How about Nucleus or Nucleo? Or in German: Atomkern ;-) nucleus is taken ...a blogging system cheers -- Torsten - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Please change Open JPA to OpenJPA

It's ok, we can deal :) I've chatted with Patrick about it the past as obviously I like OpenFOO as in Open{SSL,SSH,LDAP,EJB,JMS,ORB} etc. His perspective was whatever the community wants is good with him. I think that's a pretty reasonable stance so in that same spirit, if Apache Open JPA is th

Re: [RT] Super Simple Site Generation Tool

Personally, I'd like to see if the Forrest folks can "redeem" the product's reputation here, and make people happy in a timely manner. Incubator has been using Forrest for how long? So how long do you want to go on with something that seems to generate a lot of annoyance with anyone but you an

Re: [RT] Super Simple Site Generation Tool

Sorry, don't get it... At work we are running continuum watching svn commits and then automatically rebuilding our site with forrest. Noone has to care about html nor forrest. Just check out the xdocs and commit them - done. My 2 cents cheers -- Torsten PGP.sig Description: This is a digitall