Personally, I'd like to see if the Forrest folks can "redeem" the product'sreputation here, and make people happy in a timely manner.Incubator has been using Forrest for how long? So how long do you want to go on with something that seems to generate a lot of annoyance withanyone but you and the forrest committers (that is based on the commentsin this thread - I see you liking forrest, and I see David and Ross trying very har at "damage control").
Although I am a cocooner I am really not biased here (honestly!) ...but I do think this whole discussion is a bit unfair. Everyone blames the tool - I would blame the process (and the related issues David pointed out) As long as everyone has to have a tool locally to build and commit a site in order to change *content*, people *will* find the tool annoying.A smaller tool maybe less ...but it's *is* an additional step that should
not be required. Period!Could we maybe use the energy that comes out of this thread of frustration
and concentrate on fixing the process instead? cheers -- Torsten
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
