+1 carried over from dev@
Thank you, all!
Tim Allison (IPMC and PPMC)
On 2025/04/22 05:13:40 Richard Zowalla wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We’ve got positive feedback on the DISCUSS threads for graduation [1,2] as
> well es on our dev list vote [3], and would like to start a VOTE now.
The Apache StormCrawler (Incubating) team is pleased to announce the
release of version 3.3.0 of Apache StormCrawler.
StormCrawler is a collection of resources for building low-latency,
customisable and scalable web crawlers on Apache Storm.
Apache StormCrawler (Incubating) 3.3.0 source distributi
The vote was successful with three +1 from IPMCs and no -1s.
Ayush Saxena
Richard Zowalla (carried over from the PPMC vote)
Tim Allison
I'll release the artifacts and update the website shortly.
Thank you, all.
Best,
Tim
On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 12:27 PM Ayush Saxena wrote:
&
ship it
[+0] meh, don't care
[-1] stop, there is a ${showstopper}
Please include your checklist in your vote:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/Incubator+Release+Checklist
The PPMC vote is here:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/2m2642pt0os7xrbjnlqnly0koyf1l0nt
Thanks!
The Apache StormCrawler (Incubating) team is pleased to announce the
release of version 3.2.0 of Apache StormCrawler.
StormCrawler is a collection of resources for building low-latency,
customisable and scalable web crawlers on Apache Storm.
Apache StormCrawler (Incubating) 3.2.0 source distributi
The vote has passed with 3 binding IMPC +1s and no -1s.
Ayush Saxena
Richard Zowalla
Tim Allison
I’ll release the artifacts shortly.
Thank you, all!
Best,
Tim
On Fri, Dec 6, 2024 at 11:29 AM Tim Allison wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I have posted a 3rd release candidate for t
BATOR/Incubator+Release+Checklist
Here's my +1
- checked signatures and digests
- confirmed license, readme, etc.
- confirmed full build locally
Thanks!
Tim Allison
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apac
I'm changing my vote to -1 based on Justin's feedback. I'm cancelling the
vote. Fixes made[0]. I'll restart an RC#3 shortly.
If there's anything else we need to do, please let us know before I roll
RC#3 in a few hours. Thank you.
Best,
Tim
[0]
https://gi
bator+Release+Checklist
Here's my +1 (IPMC binding)
- checked signatures and digests
- confirmed license, readme, etc.
- confirmed full build locally
Thanks!
Tim
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apac
y.
Thank you.
Best,
Tim
P.S. On jai-imageio-core and Tika see:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-304
On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 2:01 AM Richard Zowalla wrote:
>
> Hi Justin,
>
> Thanks for the heads-up. We can fix up the (legacy) test files and remove
> mentions to
- checked signatures and digest
- confirmed full build locally
Thanks!
Tim Allison
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
+1
Thank you PJ and team!
On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 4:33 PM PJ Fanning wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Following the discussion about the StormCrawler proposal [1], I am
> starting this official vote for the StormCrawler podling. Here is the
> proposal:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/I
OneTable is a really interesting project, would be great to have it in
the ASF incubator.
Am 04.12.2023 22:23 schrieb Jesus Camacho Rodriguez:
> Hi All,
>
> I would like to propose a new project to the ASF incubator - OneTable.
>
> OneTable[1] is an omni-directional converter for table formats th
+1 (non-binding)
On 04/11/2022, 16:06, "Nathan Hartman" wrote:
Dear Apache Incubator Community,
I would like to call a VOTE to graduate Apache NuttX from the
Incubator to the status of Top-Level-Project (TLP).
The NuttX PPMC has held a community vote to graduate [1] and the vo
your time to review our release
candidate!
We will proceed with publishing the approved artifacts and sending out
the announcements in the coming days.
On behalf of the Apache StreamPipes Community,
Tim
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
n guide is available at [4]. The KEYS file is
available at [5]
Thanks for taking your time for validating this release!
Best
Tim
[1]
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/streampipes/0.70.0/rc1/
[2]
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestreampipes-1019
+1 (non-binding)
Great project & code-base
Good luck!
Am 07.11.19, 20:00 schrieb "Dominik Riemer" :
Hi all,
following up the [DISCUSS] thread on StreamPipes
(https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/1cf79ef65888f695b4b925fd67ef8a2b845f6b0931c251a0ff1115e1@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.
I recently joined Flagon as a mentor. Please do help!
On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 8:55 PM Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Flagon mentors seem to have gone missing, and this is slowing them down on
> their path to graduation.
>
> Can anyone help out by mentoring the project?
>
> Apache Flagon [1] is a
> Meanwhile we found Impala is a very good MPP SQL query engine, so we
> integrated
them together.
Palo didn't integrate with Impala, it forked Impala's codebase and embedded
it in its own repository. I don't remember any attempts from the Palo team
to engage with the Impala community or attempt
Thanks for your hard work on this Bharath.
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 11:14 PM, Bharath Vissapragada <
bhara...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> The vote has passed with the following tally.
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> - Brock Noland
> - Carl Steinbach
> - John D. Ament
>
> -1 (binding) - None
> 0 - None
>
> Thanks
+1 (non-binding)
Great project (and I've used it).
On 5/31/17 11:59 AM, Kostas Sakellis wrote:
+1 (non-binding)
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 11:46 AM, Andrew Purtell
wrote:
+1 (binding)
On May 31, 2017, at 6:03 AM, Sean Busbey wrote:
Hi folks!
I'm calling a vote to accept "Livy" into the Ap
+1 (binding)
On 14/04/17 04:25, Josh Elser wrote:
> Folks,
>
> The Pirk PPMC have recently voted unanimously to retire the podling.
> This decision, while heavy-hearted, comes on the tails of months of no
> development with no change on the horizon.
>
> Context for those interesting in reading:
rument that suits them well... if there are un-mentored podlings
doing "bad things" - regardless of tenure - then that would be of
concern to us I reckon... but there isn't evidence of that?
Thanks,
--tim
-
To unsub
release.
This file is generated by the javadoc tool. We are not modifying it
(incl. not putting in a copyright) and it is excluded in our RAT checks.
Regards,
Tim
> - No unexpected binary files in source release
> - Can compile from source
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
>
+1 (binding)
Tim
On 07/10/16 02:08, Ellison Anne Williams wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> The PPMC vote for the Apache Pirk 0.2.0-incubating release has passed. We
> kindly request that the IMPC now vote on the release..
>
> The PPMC vote thread is located here:
> https://lists.a
Hi Ted,
The subject line was not modified, but you can see the [RESULT] announced
to the general@incubator.a.o list here
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201608.mbox/%3CCAD637oPkCXQ2SM67Uwe0kAmKO4uMKrBnBsbDcmvvNk_13wh%3D2g%40mail.gmail.com%3E
Regards,
Tim
On 30 August
+1 binding
Regards,
Tim
On 26/08/16 13:37, Ellison Anne Williams wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> The PPMC vote for the Apache Pirk 0.1.0-incubating release has passed after
> updating the cryptographic export information; it is a source-only release
> (no binary artifacts). We kindly r
skies is the name of an algorithm implemented by Pirk. You can see
the details linked from Pirk's website here
http://pirk.incubator.apache.org/papers/
Regards,
Tim
> Thanks, Justin
>
> 1. https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/pirk/ 2.
> ./src/main/java/org/apache/
dling
> website.
>
>
>>
>> Given that it sounds like the footer is generally-accepted sensible place
>> for the disclaimer [2], and that the branding guidelines do not currently
>> strictly require the Incubator logo [3], I'm not sure what the audit is
>> trying to say at this point.
>>
>>
> The audit is to document where we actually stand on the branding asks
> across the podlings as defined today. There seems to be some broad
> statements being made that everyone's out of compliance. I wanted to put
> it in black and white (with blue headers now thanks to Sergio) where each
> podling actually stands.
>
> Think of it as less of a software vendor audit and more like a comic book
> collector audit. I wanted to write down what was in the collection.
>
> Understand that I did this all of my own free will. It was not conceived
> as a private IPMC discussion.
I don't doubt for a second that this was well-intentioned, but from a
mentor's perspective that may already be guiding a podling through
what - to them - seems like
overly-complex-not-well-documented-nor-understood "rules" having [even
a well-intentioned] IPMC member nit-pick over undocumented pet-peeves
isn't helpful. I'd prefer that we, IPMC, hash out stuff then given
the mentors a chance to work through it since the relationship is
there - otherwise, it can come across as IPMC sniping...
--tim
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
ove the
fold" stuff is overreaching and encroaching on the PPMC. They have
the disclaimer, let's not overcome our boredom by being helicopter
parents...
--tim
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
+1 (binding) for the reasons already stated by others - reduces
engagement friction as projects pass through the incubator.
Having a clear indication on the site that the project is in incubation
works better than the URL segment.
Regards,
Tim
On 28/06/16 15:28, John D. Ament wrote:
>
+1
Tim
On 14/06/16 21:10, Billie Rinaldi wrote:
> Since discussion has died down and we have gotten a couple of additional
> mentor volunteers, I would like to call a VOTE on accepting Pirk into the
> Apache Incubator.
>
> Proposal: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/PirkPropo
On 08/06/16 15:59, John D. Ament wrote:
> Hey Tim,
>
> Thanks for volunteering. In order to be a mentor you need to be on the
> IPMC. Since you're already a member, its simply a matter of sending an
> email to private @ i.a.o indicating you want to join. We'll proc
Please would an administrator add TimEllison to the incubator wiki
contributors group?
Thanks,
Tim
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h
Hi Ellison Anne,
I'm also happy to be a mentor for Pirk.
I am an Apache member, and my affiliation is IBM UK Ltd (though I will
be participating on my own time, with IBM's approval, and not as part of
my day job).
Regards,
Tim
On 07/06/16 19:21, Ellison Anne Williams wrote:
&
is this just personal catharsis?
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Craig Russell
> wrote:
>> There is a sorta technical reason for the Champion to be a member of the PMC
>> of the sponsor.
>>
>> I’d expect the Champion to subscribe to the
as true of Members as well, btw, but
thought I'd point out that it's not simply Members and Officers.
--tim
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> How has the project developed since the last report?
> >
> > - The software has a few additional features, and bug fixes.
> >
> > Date of last release:
> >
> > 2014-07-29
> >
> > When were the last committers or PMC members elected?
> >
>
ommunity understand how to develop
community-driven software, I say *you take the help*. Period. Same
for Greg, which you apparently agreed based on some arbitrary N<=3.
Again, I wish you and Fineract the best...
--tim
-
To uns
nd a poor example to hint that its
acceptable/desirable in general.
Anyway, best wishes to Fineract...
Thanks,
--tim
** Just to be clear, I'm well aware that the other three mentors are
rock solid as well:)
-
To unsubscribe, e-ma
f Jim offers to help, you should
readily accept:)
--tim
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
sed on the bit I quoted, do we even need the IPMC vote (or
perhaps that vote has already occurred - just realized I still haven't
subscribed to that list)?
2. Where are things at with the trademark?
[1] http://incubator.apache.org/guides/retirement
Thanks,
Tim
-Original Message--
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 5:10 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> It isn't OK. It may have to happen, but it isn't really OK.
Looks like this got written, but I'm not sure why such an unforgiving
stance - this happens fairly often on TLPs and the board is always
gracious and understandi
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 8:28 AM, Tim Williams wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 6:37 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 11:06 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 10/12/2015 10:10 AM, Emma
ues that in my mind make it a bad candidate to
> enter the Incubator, I want to be sure I can still -1 it without being
> turned into a pariah in the process. =)
Yes, as an example, take a look at the OpenOffice vote[1] that Nick referred to.
Thanks,
--tim
[1] -
http://mail-archiv
gt; gaming, though in this case I think the rewards are so vanishingly
> small that that is unlikely to be a major issue.
>
> Whew!
>
> Now on to the substance of my reply:
>
> https://whimsy.apache.org/incubator/signoff
Hi Sam,
A small request - any chance yo
Oh, thanks everyone, and sorry for the ping - I missed those as I'm not
subscribed to general@incubator.apache.org.
Tim
-Original Message-
From: Ross Gardler [mailto:ross.gard...@microsoft.com]
Sent: Friday, August 28, 2015 12:32 PM
To: d...@ripple.incubator.apache.org; ge
Ping! Any takers for a final IPMC vote? This should be a fairly easy one to
validate, as there were very few changes since the last release (but one of
those is an important fix we need to get out).
Thanks!
Tim
-Original Message-
From: Ross Gardler [mailto:ross.gard...@microsoft.com
tested all changes that have been made since the last release.
Thanks!
Tim
developed by The
> Apache Software Foundation “ [4].
>
> Re compiling from source some instructions in the README would be helpful as
> it seems a mvn install in the top directory may not do what is expected. (As
> far as I can see it seems to be doing a rat check and nothing else
fwiw, it'd be good that shepherds get in the habit of putting their or
initials in front of their comments, because the section is titled
"mentors/shepherd comments".
Thanks,
--tim
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 10:08 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> Ted,
>
> I've updated the l
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 11:49 PM, Dave Lester wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
> I found Konstantin's comment to be helpful. Could it have provided
> additional details? Sure. But I don't think there's a need to make this
> personal. Shepherd comments tend to be quite brief.
>
s unhelpful and lazy. I'd suggest
it's better to admit that you've run out of time than offer mediocre
shepherd comments.
--tim
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional c
do you want to start setting this up?
"...as VP..."? that creates an odd, undesirable, implication. :)
--tim
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
aspects of The Apache Way which is what made the Apache
> brand so valuable and noteworthy.
>
> Maybe we need to change the proposal guide.
This wasn't well-received 4.5 years ago[1] :/ I still think it's a
more valuable question than the "brand" one - which is likel
On 25/11/14 19:39, sebb wrote:
> On 25 November 2014 at 17:58, Tim Ellison wrote:
>> On 25/11/14 14:59, John D. Ament wrote:
>>>> On Nov 25, 2014, at 3:03 AM, Tim Ellison wrote:
>>
>>>>> When you get the MODERATE mail you should replyAll and send the
&
On 25/11/14 14:59, John D. Ament wrote:
>> On Nov 25, 2014, at 3:03 AM, Tim Ellison wrote:
>>> When you get the MODERATE mail you should replyAll and send the
>>> acknowledgement to the *-accept-* and *-allow-tc.* addresses.
>
> So, if in the future we wanted to d
On 24/11/14 17:39, John D. Ament wrote:
> On Mon Nov 24 2014 at 10:29:02 AM Tim Ellison wrote:
>
>> On 24/11/14 14:35, John D. Ament wrote:
>>> Does anyone know the mail command to send out to allow marvin emails
>>> to get to a list without moderation?
>>
&
On 24/11/14 14:35, John D. Ament wrote:
> Does anyone know the mail command to send out to allow marvin emails
> to get to a list without moderation?
If the mail hits moderation then I/some other mod will allow it through
and add Marvin to the allowed senders'
+1, best wishes... based on revision #25[1]
--tim
[1] - http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NiFiProposal?action=recall&rev=25
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NiFiProposal has elicited a cheerful and
> positive conversation,
+1, good stuff...
--tim
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 9:02 PM, Joe Witt wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> I would like to propose NiFi as an Apache Incubator Project.
>
> In addition to the copy provided below the Wiki version of the
> proposal can be found here:
> http://wiki.apache.or
+1
--tim
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>> Following the discussion earlier in the thread:
>>http://s.apache.org/Dk7
>>
>> I would like to call a VOTE for accepting HTrace
&g
been fulfilled.
The initial query was about finding MIA mentors - I reckon changing
the mentor_tick_pattern to look for unsigned reports would help with
that?
--tim
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apach
ture the PPMC is a formal part of the IPMC's internal
organization.
--tim
> On Friday, July 25, 2014, Ross Gardler wrote:
>
>> The PPMC is not, and never has been, a formally recognized part of our
>> structure. But as I said that's a technicality in this context, the
e canonical place for you to look up
PPMC members - I've never really cared because they're not binding.
Since you give some meaning to [1] - I've done what needs to be done
to get Chris added there, not sure how long it will take to show up.
Are you interested in helping revi
carry through here leaving us 1 shy of
3 binding +1 votes from IPMC members. I'm not seeing the point of
confusion here.
Thanks,
--tim
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
;s what
you're referring to. I'm still under that impression [as one of the
mentors] that we require 3 binding IPMC votes. If that's changed and I
missed it, let me be the first to buy you a beer at the next ApacheCon
for enlightening us:)
Thanks,
--tim
-
uided, or lack of
insight :)
Tim
On 21/06/14 00:37, Julian Hyde wrote:
> The dozen or so messages from abiola balogun on this list
> in the past month have been monosyllabic non sequiturs [1]. I think he/she/it
> is a spam bot and propose that he/she/it be removed from the list.
>
Looks like you are a member, are you getting permission denied on
something specific?
twilliams@minotaur:~$ list_unix_group.pl incubator | grep gagz
gagz
Thanks,
--tim
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apach
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 5:19 AM, ant elder wrote:
> Tim, one of the things we're trying to teach podlings is how to handle
> disputes and resolve problems in a happy respectful manner. You've out
> of the blue come on to their dev list without introducing yourself
> demandi
Moving this[1] to general@
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 2:55 AM, ant elder wrote:
> On Saturday, September 14, 2013, Tim Williams wrote:
>> Hi Eric,
>> I've included references inline for your convenience. I'll once again
>> [strongly] suggest you guys remove that a
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 7:18 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 4 September 2013 02:31, Tim Williams wrote:
>> I notice that Chris just pointed[1] spark to the nifty keys
>> listing[1]. Our docs still imply manual maintenance of the typical
>> KEYS file[2]. Honestly, I didn't eve
+1
--tim
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 4:07 AM, Nathan Marz wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'd like to propose Storm to be an Apache Incubator project. After much
> thought I believe this is the right next step for the project, and I look
> forward to hearing everyone's thoughts a
file nowadays vs. copying that over
periodically to KEYS?
Thanks,
--tim
[1] - http://people.apache.org/keys/group/spark.asc
[2] -
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#distribution-signing
-
To unsubscribe, e
Why not take it from the number Clutch reports?
On Monday, July 8, 2013, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> Greets,
>
> For our report, I'd like to supply an official count of podlings under
> incubation. Here's one way of doing it from the incubator svn checkout:
>
> grep . content/report_due_* | wc -l
ocial norms can
be overridden/bullied occasionally by headstrong, salty old-timers as
they see fit...
Thanks,
--tim
> Sent from a mobile device, please excuse mistakes and brevity
> On 18 Jun 2013 03:18, "Marvin Humphrey" wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Ross G
Stratos project as an incubating project
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1 Do not accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
> because... (provide reason)
+1 (check-my-binding-status-and-dont-rely-on-the-"caller-asserts"-model)
Thanks,
--tim
+1
--tim
On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 1:34 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (398J)
wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> OK discussion has died down, time to VOTE to accept Spark into the
> Apache Incubator. I'll let the VOTE run for at least a week.
>
> So far I've heard +1s from the following fol
it all. A lot. It's an attempt to solve the real problem.
But how do you define "inactive" and how do you identify them and on
what periodicity? And, if they're a Member how long must such a
person wait before re-signin
ed to solve, in
that way, we are afforded the opportunity to propose an alternative
solution - for example, by focusing on highlighting the problem
mentors/podlings.
Thanks,
--tim
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
overly burdensome (yes, even a
tiny-little-heartbeat report). Let's please not add overhead/burden
to healthy podlings for the sake of the few unhealthy.
Thanks,
--tim
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...
On Saturday, February 2, 2013, wrote:
> Author: grobmeier
> Date: Sat Feb 2 15:22:33 2013
> New Revision: 1441762
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1441762&view=rev
> Log:
> updated status page for onami
>
> Modified:
> incubator/public/trunk/content/projects/onami.xml
>
> Modified: i
Hmm... is that the right reporting group?
http://incubator.apache.org/report-groups.txt
Thanks,
--tim
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> Looks good.
>
> btw: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/January2013
> On Dec 29, 2012 6:42 PM, "Benson Margulies" w
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 7:48 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 7:35 PM, Marvin Humphrey
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Tim Williams wrote:
>>> FWIW, I feel the same. I'd rather see 'did not report' and let the
>>>
; In my opinion constant nagging is not necessary - "did not report"
> does the job as well as this line is a report as well; if a project
> constantly fails report to report its more a matter to retirement than
>
fyi, Blur just finished their monthly reporting obligation. I
miscalculated where we'd end up when I set it up initially and we
should be in group 2 vs. group 3. I've updated podlings.xml, I'll
remove us from December, if anyone knows anywhere else needing updated
let me know...
General note: if you are a PPMC member or mentor, and you feel that
> your community is undersupplied with Mentor attention (e.g., you have
> trouble getting votes for releases), please start a thread here.
The report is meant to communicate th
h qualified mentors." ... in hopes that the second half of that
will ultimately address the 'indefinite' concern...
Thanks,
--tim
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.or
Hi Jukka,
You'll need to add Blur to these rotations I reckon
Thanks,
--tim
On Saturday, September 8, 2012, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> With apologies for the lateness, here are the shepherd assignments for
> this month:
>
> Benson Margulies - Cordova, F
Drats, found it as soon as i hit send...
http://incubator.apache.org/report-groups.txt
--tim
On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 7:09 AM, Tim Williams wrote:
> is there a new page that lists the reporting schedule? The old
> page[1] just has a link to "next month" but I'm interest
is there a new page that lists the reporting schedule? The old
page[1] just has a link to "next month" but I'm interested in knowing
*this* month.
Thanks,
--tim
[1] - http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ReportingSchedule
-
gt; since you say it represents existing policy. Since I can find no
> place on the IPMC or ASF website where this policy is actually stated
> (and please correct me if I missed it), it might be good if we took my
> summary from above and put it into the Podling Release Guide. I kno
Hi Otis,
Nice! yeah, we're bootstrapping now... join us on blur-dev@i.a.o and
blur-user@i.a.o
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/blur.html
The ticket's in now to get the git repo up too.
Thanks,
--tim
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 8:05 PM, Otis Gospodnetic
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
With the following votes, this vote passes. I'll submit a suggested
resolution to the board shortly. Thanks everyone who voted and
supported the DirectMemory community through their incubation...
+1's Binding:
- Tim Williams
- Olivier Lamy
- Jean-Baptiste Onofre
- Jukka Zitting
- D
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 7:57 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 12:22 AM, Tim Williams wrote:
>> The DirectMemory community is ready to graduate and become a full TLP.
>> [...]
>> Please VOTE to submit the below resolution to the board fo
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 6:22 PM, Tim Williams wrote:
> The DirectMemory community is ready to graduate and become a full TLP.
> We began incubation in October 2011 and have demonstrated our ability
> to function according to the Apache Way. We've successfully made a
> release.
ormal vote - it's not a requirement - but the sense of the
community is that we're ready to go[1].
Please VOTE to submit the below resolution to the board for consideration:
[ ] +1 DirectMemory graduates to TLP
[ ] -1 DirectMemory isn't ready, because...
Vote will remain open for 72
inkedhashmap - Apache 2.0 License -
> http://code.google.com/p/concurrentlinkedhashmap/
>
> == Cryptography ==
> none
>
> == Required Resources ==
> * Mailing Lists
>* blur-private
> * blur-dev
>* blur-commits
>* blur-user
> * Subversion Directory
to subtickets does not concern
> me, but the lack of detail in these requests is strikingly bad
> and needs to be addressed by the IPMC. Thanks.
Hi Joe,
Can you point to a ticket [or tickets] from a graduating podling that
got it right?
Thanks,
--tim
--
rongly encourage a more passive board-style
role (e.g. stepping in only when a problem exists).
The "burstiness", btw, is likely a result of this being a true
volunteer effort - AFAIK, no one's being paid to hack on it.
Thanks,
--tim
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
1 - 100 of 182 matches
Mail list logo
